Verified:

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jun 18th 2010, 21:18:33

could be or those are at es.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

Kyatoru Game profile

Member
688

Jun 18th 2010, 21:31:15

Or email contacts, or icq contacts, or screenshots etc from earthstats or ezclan before that.

People should put some effort into their alliances. People should put some effort into the game.
+Kya

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jun 18th 2010, 22:22:14

all that was at es and ............
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Jun 18th 2010, 23:12:35

Sounds like a threat :P

Devestation Game profile

Member
812

Jun 19th 2010, 1:13:25

We lost em Kyatoru... :/

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jun 19th 2010, 17:59:25

Originally posted by locket:
Sounds like a threat :P


*kills locket*
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

TheORKINMan Game profile

Member
1305

Jun 19th 2010, 18:46:00

So is it Pang we need to complain to to get this 72 hour no land drop BS rule changed? :P
Smarter than your average bear.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jun 19th 2010, 19:04:14

suiciders actually, dev-team just prevented suiciders not dropping land after their farm-spree.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Jun 19th 2010, 19:38:17

Orkin it dosnt stop them from suiciding so what is the problem? It simply allows the suicided to be able to get something back sometimes. They still lose out.

TheORKINMan Game profile

Member
1305

Jun 19th 2010, 20:01:10

Suiciding is a method of keeping the tyranny of the majority in check :P
Smarter than your average bear.

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1931

Jun 19th 2010, 21:31:09

This isn't a democratic political system.

TheORKINMan Game profile

Member
1305

Jun 19th 2010, 21:57:07

No it's not which is why if you can't defend your acres you shouldn't be entitled to them back by that failsafe.
Smarter than your average bear.

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 19th 2010, 22:45:29

does that logic not apply to suiciders?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
4491

Jun 19th 2010, 23:17:04

Platitudes aren't a substitute for an argument, orkin.

Devestation Game profile

Member
812

Jun 20th 2010, 2:54:38

i must admit, I'm actually having fun in this lot of land trading. Thanks LaF :P

Detmer Game profile

Member
4240

Jun 20th 2010, 4:11:43

I agree with the ability to suicide, but not to destroy acres. By the very nature of expenses someone will always be able to stockpile then buy up to suicide. What is nonsensical is the ability to completely erase the gains from those attacks. If you want to destroy something you should use nukes or AB. Buildings can be destroyed (and nukes effectively lay the land to complete waste). Until you have the ability to spread nuclear waste across your country side you should not be able to destroy your own acres. (maybe that could be a change back in favor of suiciding - adding a turn+$$ cost to destroying acres)

nimrodix Game profile

Member
737

Jun 20th 2010, 4:18:46

or get a few buddies to br u to death afterwards

General TwizTid

Member
1145

Jun 20th 2010, 4:39:53

BAM! now im emeril.
General TwizTid
NBK HFA - FFA
EEVIL Member - Alliance
MSN:
yahoo:
ICQ: 307692788
#nbk on irc.gamesurge.net
http://nbk.boxcarhosting.com
[01:37] <@Gambit> if it has a hole, ill fill it!

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1931

Jun 20th 2010, 6:10:58

I don't think so scode.

Neil Game profile

Member
275

Jun 20th 2010, 13:07:55

"Not that i have any say on it, but that sounds like the attitude of an alliance looking to be tag killed. "

Obviously LaF can grab anyone they want but people cant grab LaF. Its a well known fact. LaF and bigger and more organized.
Work on taking the retal. LaF doesn't accept grabs.

is it teacher or techer?

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Jun 20th 2010, 18:39:12

They didn't even really try to take retals which is what I found dumb :P

SolidSnake Game profile

Member
867

Jun 20th 2010, 19:25:37

oh no they did try and retal, 4 and half days after the last grab on rage, they attempted a retal and failed... the guy was only about 4-5m jets short of breaking, nothing huge though...


embarising much?