Verified:

llaar Game profile

Member
11,279

Jun 20th 2011, 2:11:57

i've been away all weekend, 1/3rd my tag is dead and there is no war declaration

we expressly told every clan in this server NA is netting and trying to rebuild our membership base from our reunion set

i chatted with helmet mid last week about pacting, messaged him as such on the 11th and offered him a pact, and told him we were netting and wanted nothing to do with SoF, nor anything to do with any war

why does everyone here spread such ridiculous politics around? leave us alone!

~llaar
Netters Anonymous President

Bombay Game profile

Member
257

Jun 20th 2011, 2:18:22

Lost in the mail?

WH Game profile

Member
354

Jun 20th 2011, 2:22:16

im sure the 1/3 would be alive if llaar was here to play all his countries...

Erian Game profile

Member
702

Jun 20th 2011, 2:28:09

It's complicated. I've had 2 beers, and I STILL don't really understand. But more war = WIN, so I'm fine with that.

llaar Game profile

Member
11,279

Jun 20th 2011, 2:45:27

come on make more jokes on how much i cheat

they are all so funny

Mr. Lime Game profile

Member
539

Jun 20th 2011, 2:56:54

they were scared... <3 llaar

amazing how a basic unap will get you drag'd into wars these days isn't it
ICQ: 20654127

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 2:57:20

It's probably because you guys have your head up SoLs ass and keep flirting with SoF, when SoF finally decides to sex your butt you run off and try to mate with LaF.

Congrats, you are the fluffs of the alliance server.

llaar Game profile

Member
11,279

Jun 20th 2011, 3:48:25

up ass? really now? what have we done to show that? have we FS'd anyone? oh wait, of the past 8 months, imag FS'd us 3 times and SOF has FS'd us once

what have we done?

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 4:06:21

Hitting LaF kind of proves that. You had no business else in that war. LaF was a uNAP stupid clause or not. You were engaged in war with SoF.

LaF is garbage at warring usually, but one thing I have noticed is they usually do get their revenge. SoF wanted to war you, sounds like they felt you were gunning for them. You should have fought your war.

You pact how SoL tells you.

Vic Rattlehead Game profile

Member
810

Jun 20th 2011, 4:26:17

You are a moron. Llaar and I both tried to pact with SOF.
NA hFA
gchat:
yahoo chat:

available 24/7

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 4:30:48

Too late too little, I am not a moron here. It was straight from Helmet.
They felt the pact was your attempt to exit your own plan to FS them. If you had no plans why not pact them before the set even started.

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Jun 20th 2011, 4:40:23

Thats a poor excuse.
Acting out on 'feelings' instead of logic. *sarcastic thumbs up*

Vic Rattlehead Game profile

Member
810

Jun 20th 2011, 4:50:09

It should be known by now, generally, that I spent a good deal of time without my home PC and was generally unavailable until recently. I got all of my pacting done late. Ask around.

edit - unavailable for the better part of a month and a half, but always responded to PMs here!
NA hFA
gchat:
yahoo chat:

available 24/7

llaar Game profile

Member
11,279

Jun 20th 2011, 5:02:22

plans to FS them? thats why i ran a rep casher, and was at 100 BPT with no war techs

i run mono -> tyranny for war. everyone should know that of me by this point. its been my modus operandi for about a decade now in every server i've played in

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 5:03:06

Here's SoL to back up their butt buddies.

Logic was to wipe them, they did. Anyone with a braincell would pact SoF in the beginning of the set, especially knowing SoF is not so close to them.

Silent Sentinel Game profile

Member
325

Jun 20th 2011, 5:07:18

Is coming on AT and moaning going to change anything? No. May as well just suck it up and do your best.

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Jun 20th 2011, 6:06:24

Originally posted by FutureGhost:
Here's SoL to back up their butt buddies.

Logic was to wipe them, they did. Anyone with a braincell would pact SoF in the beginning of the set, especially knowing SoF is not so close to them.


You are saying there was no reason for SOF to FS NA. Gotcha.

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 6:23:30

Well such reading comprehension skills are likely why SoL is the most disliked alliance in the game.

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Jun 20th 2011, 7:29:35

Uh huh. I guess you have no answers so you have to resort to sad attempts at insulting me.

Ill explain my position step by step so you can understand how 'sad' you sound.

You said,
FutureGhost: "They(SOF) felt the pact was your attempt to exit your own plan to FS them."


My reply,
Jiman: "Thats a poor excuse.
Acting out on 'feelings' instead of logic."


As you can see, I am refering to the fact that SOF based their actions on an emotions (fear) that NA was going to attack.

Your reply to this comment was,

FutureGhost: Logic was to wipe them, they did. Anyone with a braincell would pact SoF in the beginning of the set, especially knowing SoF is not so close to them.

As you can see, your answer to my comment did not actually make sense in context to my previous reply.

Looking at the comment made here, you make the suggestion that SOF "wiped" NA based on the fact that they should have "pact SoF in the beginning of the set".

Remember, these are your own words saying this. Not mine. I am not sure you have the ability at the moment to properly articulate your thoughts coherently. Looks like the miscommunication is on your end. I hope you not mad bro.


Edit:

And yes, I do believe basing a FS on fear with no proof to back that fear up is not a reason to do a first strike.

Edited By: Jiman on Jun 20th 2011, 14:27:16
See Original Post

Drinks Game profile

Member
1290

Jun 20th 2011, 8:56:31

This has to be my favourite excuse for a war i have ever seen!

Indirect quote from about 10 different posts on AT:
Sof FSed NA because we were planning on FSing them with 80% of the NA tag running reps/fascs.

lolololololol.
Ive seen some pretty stupid posts on AT, but i think this excuse tops the stupid list.

Lets assume NA ran reps/fasc in order to disguise themselves as netting. But oh wait when you got spy ops before your FS didnt you see that almost all of NA had a spal under 15 and 0 wartech.
From our country threads in NA there were 5 NA countries running retaller/killers as they are on the kill team in NA with the other 50ish in full netting mode netting.
<Drinks> going to bed
<Drinks> pm me if I get hit
<-- Drinks is now known as DrinksInBed -->
<DrinksInBed> looks like I'm an alcoholic

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Jun 20th 2011, 8:58:49

Yes, thats exactly the reason, we post our grand plans on AT.

TNTroXxor Game profile

Member
1295

Jun 20th 2011, 8:59:04

Oh no..
Originally posted by JJ23:
i havent been deleted since last set

Drinks Game profile

Member
1290

Jun 20th 2011, 9:00:39

I guess thats why sof never posted a war dec then flamey.
<Drinks> going to bed
<Drinks> pm me if I get hit
<-- Drinks is now known as DrinksInBed -->
<DrinksInBed> looks like I'm an alcoholic

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Jun 20th 2011, 9:04:14

There was no need, I talked to your FA about it after the FS.

Lord Slayer Game profile

Member
601

Jun 20th 2011, 11:59:42

Wait, am I seeing in this thread, SOL complaining about someone needing a reason to FS someone.....

WOW...

Chevs

Member
2061

Jun 20th 2011, 12:21:21

I was away also until wednesday, but I heard from flamey that llaar and vic used the N word when trying to get a pact, in this day in age that is just not acceptable
SOF Head Of Poop
2019-04-03 21:40:26 PS the stinky deyicks (#599) Beryl Houston (#360) LaF 30638A (43783A)
En4cer: Chevs... u would have beaten me by more than 100m

Walding Game profile

Member
818

Jun 20th 2011, 13:01:22

N word? Wow.... They are NA

I actually dislike SoF more than SoL.

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Jun 20th 2011, 13:07:21

You're being killed because SoF is far better prepped than you are.


Just sayin...
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

xaos Game profile

Forum Moderator
237

Jun 20th 2011, 13:25:15

Should HAVE. Questions end with question marks. Run-on sentences. Commas separate parts of sentences.

Good god, people. Ten years ago I wouldn't have cared so much about the fluffty grammar, but seriously, haven't most of you aged ten years in the meantime?

*cries*

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Jun 20th 2011, 14:04:45

"why are we being killed?"

you declared war on us =) that's why LaF is killing you guys. otherwise we wouldn't have touched you for sure =)
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

FutureGhost Game profile

Member
49

Jun 20th 2011, 14:30:43

Okay so SoL will just sit there next set when they don't get pacted by someone and let said alliance FS if they wish or maybe that alliance will decide they aren't strong enough and back out and try to get a pact.

Sweet logic.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 18:10:47

I fail to see what llaars past has to do with right now?

We didnt back away from SOL. llaar had us on a path this set to keep gaining and rebuilding membership.

SoF hit because they didn't want ANY CHANCE of us to hit. Which was the case..because were fluffing weren't going to.

Murf Game profile

Member
1212

Jun 20th 2011, 18:18:58

fluff happens build a bridge and get over it

CeyLonTEa Game profile

Member
248

Jun 20th 2011, 18:48:09

/me build the bridge

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jun 20th 2011, 18:53:08

I hate llaar. It's the only reason SoF FSed NA. It's all my fault.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Chevs

Member
2061

Jun 20th 2011, 18:53:54

Don't burn bridges you'd be willing to cross again later
SOF Head Of Poop
2019-04-03 21:40:26 PS the stinky deyicks (#599) Beryl Houston (#360) LaF 30638A (43783A)
En4cer: Chevs... u would have beaten me by more than 100m

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 19:01:55

Whos burning the bridge Chevs?

archaic Game profile

Member
7011

Jun 20th 2011, 19:06:55

/me chuckles at the ongoing SoF/NA bullfluff - whats it been, 3-4 years now?

SoF likes to war and hates NA. Is it bullfluff? Yes. Is it reality? Yes. After all of this time did NA still get caught pants down again? Yes.

You guys knew a server war was coming and that SoF might not have a dance partner. Yet you failed to get them pacted and were not war-prepped. This was a foreseeable outcome that you should have expected. If a bitter historic rival had put off pacting me a week into the set . . . I'd be buying SDI.

Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jun 20th 2011, 19:09:42

SDI wasn't needed. SoF is tarded and we didn't have any missiles.

Stupid ass tyr/Indy strat
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 0:30:58

Why would we prepare for war when we fully geared to net?

archaic Game profile

Member
7011

Jun 21st 2011, 1:19:44

/me facepalms
Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

CrazyMatt Game profile

Member
265

Jun 21st 2011, 1:23:16

BONUS POST CUZ ITS BORING

NOW3P Game profile

Member
6503

Jun 21st 2011, 3:11:03

*pees on the bridge, and then lights it on fire*

I actually think it's kinda cute how SoF continually falls back on killing a netting clan that they know from repeated experience has no interest in fighting them whatsoever, and then stands and beats their chests like they're actually a real war clan.

Very macho, ladies

Chadius Game profile

Member
377

Jun 21st 2011, 4:24:24

Ford, you guys have missiles, I've seen them flying at people. :P
It would be more interesting if the "warring" clans, would fight other "warring" clans. Otherwise it feels like I bought a pay per view to watch Anderson Silva fight some guy who has very little stand up. (*cough* Damien Maia)
LAF

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

Jun 21st 2011, 4:26:30

well, i didnt have missiles. a FEW ran techers but the "recommended" strat was a mono/indy/farmer hybrid that was devised to be good in a really early war. early war didnt come, worthless strat.

my country right now has 1.8mill troops, 4mill cash, and enough oil for 100K units.

pretty worthless lol
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Chadius Game profile

Member
377

Jun 21st 2011, 4:38:08

lmao, that sucks Ford. lol Should have ran the rainbow of death. :P
You guys attacked right in the middle of me switching. Caught with my pants down. But no one gave me a reach around. :( How rude. lol
LAF

warlorde Game profile

Member
255

Jun 21st 2011, 4:43:51

*searches for the very large infamous stick up Ford's ass*

Can't find it...

NA gets too much fluff on these boards

Drinks Game profile

Member
1290

Jun 21st 2011, 6:38:30

Sof: Isnt it boring warring NA. Its like playing a game on Very easy.

Or for those who play sport.Its like being in the top division and versing the 5th division in a practice match. Its boring as fluff for both sides lol.
<Drinks> going to bed
<Drinks> pm me if I get hit
<-- Drinks is now known as DrinksInBed -->
<DrinksInBed> looks like I'm an alcoholic

ComCap Game profile

New Member
6

Jun 21st 2011, 6:43:33

this is an interesting post for my forum bonus points.

Flamey Game profile

Member
895

Jun 21st 2011, 10:32:22

Well, NA has pretty much told us they'll be warring us again next reset, so make the most out of it.