Bonus

You talk a lot but say essentially nothing at all. You deflect and distract. Use ad hominem. Throw in a good measure of strawman arguments. Its almost as if you post for the sake of hearing yourself speak. Maybe your ego was bruised. But it just comes off as you trying very hard to appear intelligent. Tough day at work? You know, it takes people with real pedigree and brains to be in charge. It's very hierarchical, but you know that. Scrubs will continue to take orders from those that bark them. So get used to it. Sucks when you're not tough enough to do a man's work, and not brainy enough to be in charge. Stuck in the middle. Behind the scenes. Ouch.

Congratulations for not addressing my points, accusing me of using strawman arguments and ad hominem, then spending your entire post doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing. The difference? The only ad hominem I used was calling you a moron because, quite frankly, you are. Hell, I had to dumb down my language on your behest.

I did not set up a strawman, and I question if you even know what a strawman consists of. Your first reply to me in this thread was a strawman, for example. I'm just calling you out on not using the term socialist correct and I do the same when people misuse the word fascist. Why? Because it is intellectually dishonest to accuse someone of taking a certain stance, which you deem to be "deplorable", simply for having a different opinion then you. It is a tactic used far too often in society these days thanks to the followers of Alinsky that think labeling someone is the proper reaction to a different opinion. It squelches debate and creates a rift between the reasonable people and the unreasonable people. You, sir, are an unreasonable person, and I assume you use that tactic because you are incapable of constructing a clear, well-thought out, and logical argument since you have failed to present one here. Oh, and saying so is not ad hominem, unlike your post; rather, it is an observation made from what little coherence you have presented in this thread.

tldr; get on my level

We haven't had debates like these since blid and braden were around. Nice read.

Hmm, clintonista got some good debates going more recently as well.

Says the guy with HS level education.

lots of action in this thread :)

Wow, that's your comeback after 5 days?

I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

Stop looking at me, SWAN!

[quote poster=sinistril; 42873; 807517]Congratulations for not addressing my points, accusing me of using strawman arguments and ad hominem, then spending your entire post doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing. The difference? The only ad hominem I used was calling you a moron because, quite frankly, you are. Hell, I had to dumb down my language on your behest.

I did not set up a strawman, and I question if you even know what a strawman consists of. Your first reply to me in this thread was a strawman, for example. I'm just calling you out on not using the term socialist correct and I do the same when people misuse the word fascist. Why? Because it is intellectually dishonest to accuse someone of taking a certain stance, which you deem to be "deplorable", simply for having a different opinion then you. It is a tactic used far too often in society these days thanks to the followers of Alinsky that think labeling someone is the proper reaction to a different opinion. It squelches debate and creates a rift between the reasonable people and the unreasonable people. You, sir, are an unreasonable person, and I assume you use that tactic because you are incapable of constructing a clear, well-thought out, and logical argument since you have failed to present one here. Oh, and saying so is not ad hominem, unlike your post; rather, it is an observation made from what little coherence you have presented in this thread.


shut the hell up.

oh looky, macidiot is back.

May your soul be condemned by God and swiftly sent to the cauldrons of hell.

Says the guy without HS level education?

Since we're being childish :P

If Express was intended to be a "war-based game" then we would have included leaderboards for kills, attacks, etc as we did for some other servers. Griefing is not something that should be celebrated or romanticized.

This thread should be closed. Slagpit has spoken.

Amen!

Cowards.

Says the guy that consistently topfeeds, attacks late into the set and proceeds to finish terrible.

Hey, sometimes I war before the end of the set, it's not consistent.

Buy more turrets.

Besides, it's more interesting than bottom feeding on jets til you're all big fat and juicy.