Jul 7th 2011, 9:10:21
I was and had crafted a long reply showing that if it were a game with large population and ample support you could get away with that thinking but being it is a struggling and low population game that we all have to be aware of what each action will do to the community. What will be the straw that finally breaks the camels back?
It's not worth all that hand holding and nurturing bullfluff though.
You like to make the game boring and pointless to play for people who enjoy building for 2 months to achieve something. You don't think you should have to worry about what effect your actions have on the game?
Jiman, what would you do if someone succeeded in recruiting a couple hundred people, and all they did was kill SoL in the beginning of the set and then let the netgainers land farm them? Before SoL disbanded would you plead with the person who organized it to stop for the good of the game? Would you beg the admins to put a stop to it, for the good of the game?
I think so. Yet what SoL is and has been doing is far worse. SoL actually likes warring and dieing. SoL doesn't build 2 month countries. They don't invest time in mapping out exactly what brings the most networth. They don't invest their free time and set alarms when they have to come online to hit a target. They don't play the game to reach the end of the set.
If you didn't think it was okay to blindside people who invest a lot of time and patience over the course of 2 months and who generally speaking try to stay out of war... perhaps then the admins would come down against the actions taken against you, maybe the community would have your back and blast the evil gangbangers.
Don't deflect either. This is all about SoL. LCN and LaF? You think they would actually go into a long drawn out war if SoL was reasonable to them? What will it take for SoL to understand netters don't like to be FSed when they are netgaining. Does Monsters have to blind side FS you for you to get it through your head?
It's not worth all that hand holding and nurturing bullfluff though.
You like to make the game boring and pointless to play for people who enjoy building for 2 months to achieve something. You don't think you should have to worry about what effect your actions have on the game?
Jiman, what would you do if someone succeeded in recruiting a couple hundred people, and all they did was kill SoL in the beginning of the set and then let the netgainers land farm them? Before SoL disbanded would you plead with the person who organized it to stop for the good of the game? Would you beg the admins to put a stop to it, for the good of the game?
I think so. Yet what SoL is and has been doing is far worse. SoL actually likes warring and dieing. SoL doesn't build 2 month countries. They don't invest time in mapping out exactly what brings the most networth. They don't invest their free time and set alarms when they have to come online to hit a target. They don't play the game to reach the end of the set.
If you didn't think it was okay to blindside people who invest a lot of time and patience over the course of 2 months and who generally speaking try to stay out of war... perhaps then the admins would come down against the actions taken against you, maybe the community would have your back and blast the evil gangbangers.
Don't deflect either. This is all about SoL. LCN and LaF? You think they would actually go into a long drawn out war if SoL was reasonable to them? What will it take for SoL to understand netters don't like to be FSed when they are netgaining. Does Monsters have to blind side FS you for you to get it through your head?