Verified:

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 9th 2010, 4:57:58

thanks :)

Edited By: highrock on Dec 9th 2010, 5:26:31
See Original Post
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 8th 2010, 23:01:08

ditto i got this error too in my country
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 8th 2010, 21:50:04

Pang,

Just wanted to clarify.

I got this message after turn 10 of my batch explore:

A bonus has expired:
+10% Base Explore Rate
You Produced: 84 Spies.

But it seems like the batch explore actually explored using the +10% rate for the whole batch (unless I got really lucky). So I'm guessing the message was just coded in automatically at turn 10, but the bonus actually applies to the whole batch?

Thanks!
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 8th 2010, 21:21:47

Pang,

are you sure that the explore bonus applies to all turns in your batch explore? i tested this out last night and i got a message 10 turns into my batch explore than told me the explore bonus ended...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 6th 2010, 0:05:53

haha that was kinda sorta almost omega's theme too
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 4th 2010, 0:05:21

what happened to #586? dropped 16M NW and out of top 10 last minute...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 3rd 2010, 7:29:29

there are other things too like logging in multiple times to catch landgrabs getting out of DR times and probably more that i can't think of now...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 3rd 2010, 6:24:58

Originally posted by CrisX1:
I don't really get what you meant there,

But its very simple to see,

More turns =more networth


More military replenishment = more networth.



12 - 18 hour bonuses -> less turns for those who play more often than once a day -> less NW for more active players compared to less active players


military replenishment with 12-18 hour bonuses -> less NW for more active players relative to less active players
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 3rd 2010, 5:14:33

Originally posted by CrisX1:
That would be a good idea, every bonus turns you get including the 18 or 12 hours bonus in game would replenish your PM's.


i still don't get why the 18 and 12 hour bonuses are there...it just encourages lazy players. the new system should completely drop them. it's not like we have a ton of players now to overwhelm the server like we did back then. and making PM replenishment and the bonuses go together is an even worse idea. now we can't even login to pick up cheap military without losing out. encourages even more lazy play and punishes more active players...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 2nd 2010, 20:15:49

Originally posted by Detmer:
Originally posted by highrock:
How about no attacking of alliance mates? This would partially take care of the intra-alliance farming and also GSing into DR...


Then people will detag and retag. Perhaps this could be fixed by altering how tagging works - maybe first time you detag you can retag instantly, next time it takes one minute to retag, then two minutes, then four minutes, 8 minutes, 16, 32,64 and so on...

after five times you are guaranteed a scores update will notice and at 8 times it will take an hour which will certainly get you grabbed.

Of all the things I think flexibility is essential on, attacking your own alliance is not as much one of them. I prefer it to an alternative, but if this is actually an issue (which I am doubtful of) that would be a potential fix.

I don't like the inability to change tags on the alliance server. I don't really like it in team but it sort of makes more sense to me there...


or maybe something like no attacking within the same tag and if you detag, you have to wait 24 hours before retagging into the same tag. you can tag into a different tag instantly.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 2nd 2010, 19:26:31

How about no attacking of alliance mates? This would partially take care of the intra-alliance farming and also GSing into DR...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 1st 2010, 20:07:33

i think whoever finishes 11th should just FS Sof next set.

*watches myself finish 11th*
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 1st 2010, 1:50:11

and there's no PM sell limit...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Dec 1st 2010, 0:40:18

Originally posted by SMz:
clearing bushels = farming ur tag = oil buyout = FA

amounts might be diffrent , but its ALL legit FA :) so evo can't claim thier countries to be legit. they are amazing netters but no country can be legit today in earth's state ~_~


FA = one or more countries transferring money/NW to another country. The donor countries lose money/NW when doing this.

Therefore:

clearing bushels - not FA
farming tag - FA
oil buyout - FA
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 30th 2010, 23:22:38

bushel clearing is not the same as a buyout because the countries doing the buying are not losing any money/NW.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 30th 2010, 16:21:29

at least this reset in alliance, the increased supply definitely hurt techers as tech prices were super low throughout. if you look at the potential top 10, it could possibly be almost all farmers and cashers.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 30th 2010, 1:29:57

so who's going to take the top spot? i think it's #37 easily unless Sof can carry #292 even more. is #37 the same guy who won last set?
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 29th 2010, 19:29:16

Originally posted by braden:
i think people care far too much over these things.
if they destroyed your effort in the process, maybe, but as it stands, its a number beside the country.. the enjoyment is in building it and doing it, not looking at it afterwards with the nice number beside it?

or am i just not that vain? :P



haha so people should just not care about rankings or networth and enjoy building a country just for the fun of it, no matter how crappy? =P
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 29th 2010, 5:24:13

As somebody who played the game 10 years ago during the good old days and just recently started playing, the problem I see with farming is not that it drives untags away. Those guys are untagged for a reason and they are not noobs. The problem, as Ruthie mentioned, is that it drives vets away. When I first came back, I was shocked to see that the alliance server became an all-X server basically. In fact, I didn't even know what all-X meant because all-X didn't really exist (or wasn't widely played) back in the day. Let's face it, all-X is not that fun to play. But everybody is forced to go all-X because of the excessive farming. I admit that I did some farming this reset for the first time (more than anybody in Omega, but less than the Evo guys), and it wasn't all that fun. I basically had to be super diligent and super obsessive about finding the right targets at the right DR time, and I only ended up with 25k acres. Basically for 90% of the server, even if they wanted to landgrab, they are unable to because somebody else has already farmed the targets to huge DR.

So yes, Laf/Evo farming sucks basically because it leaves other people/alliances with nobody to grab. You may say well that's their fault they just aren't as good at grabbing. While that may technically be true, that's not helpful in retaining vets. If this type of lack of grabbing/excessive farming continues, I can see myself walking away rather than playing all-X, because all-X is not fun. I can imagine other vets or would-be players feeling this way. So yes, if you don't want to drive people away, the farming needs to stop. But it's not a problem with Laf/Evo, they are just the target of criticism because they currently do it better than anybody else. The solution must be to increase landgrabbing targets, which is why I think the untaggged bots idea needs to be priority #1 for this server.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 29th 2010, 2:38:15

^ uh not true...at least recently
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 28th 2010, 21:23:27

bump...

is there a reason why we can't do this? it seems like it shouldn't be that hard to have just one "buy" and one "sell" screen as opposed to separate ones for goods and tech. as it is now, the system hurts techers, who have to spend two turns to sell tech and stock. this might be a way to somewhat balance the previous changes that benefitted farmers.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 28th 2010, 5:00:00

Get the most for your money!
Public market prices are more favorable for Troops. If you were going to purchase those goods on the private market, considering buying from the public market instead.


Got this on the private market when the public market for troops was bought out in alliance. I think it's technically true because the public market price is $0 due to the buyout, but de facto false. Not a huge deal though, just thought i'd give a heads up...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 22nd 2010, 2:35:08

my msn hasn't been able to connect the last couple days on my mac, but i can get it to work for windows using parallels.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 22nd 2010, 0:52:24

lol Requiem i wasn't talking to you...you know you can just check the Omega site for my country number :)
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 22nd 2010, 0:25:25

and post your country number once you hit the 20B :)
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 22nd 2010, 0:23:49

I think it's a combination of

-a couple late starters
-a couple land thin techers
-more demos than usual
-very few grabbers and none that are nearly on the scale of the 4-5 fat Evo grabbers
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 21st 2010, 22:59:04

If you take away Evo, we're right at the top of average land...Evo is just skewed by their 5-6 really fat countries whereas we are mostly all-X.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 19th 2010, 23:33:21

why don't IAs lose spies from allied failed spy ops?
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 18th 2010, 6:00:17

what's your country number? i will FA you $10...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 17th 2010, 21:37:44

but theos with max mil tech has lower selling price than non-theos with equivalent mil tech i think
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 17th 2010, 20:59:22

i think theos have a lower selling price, so they get a negative bonus...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 17th 2010, 20:45:46

the highest standing order is not the one that gets it necessarily...it's basically a line where whoever put in the first order gets it...so whoever had the longest standing order at $80 or higher got it.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 10th 2010, 19:20:37

food will get to $39 because all the MBRs must sell on the public market because those MBs will drop the private market sell price into the 20s. therefore, the price will converge to around $39/$40 toward the end of the reset. anybody who doesn't think so doesn't really know what they are doing...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 10th 2010, 3:33:30

oooh what were you gonna point out?
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 10th 2010, 3:15:20

don't think it's been over 50 in alliance
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Nov 6th 2010, 23:05:30

never mind

Edited By: highrock on Nov 7th 2010, 0:11:57
See Original Post
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 26th 2010, 21:05:33

"All old/former Evolution/RED/Short Fuse/un4given/Unknown/CCSGN/CCS/SGN members are welcome and encouraged to attend in the next reset, in which the purest and most glorious form of netting will (hopefully) take place on the Alliance server."


haha totally asking to get FS'ed...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 23rd 2010, 18:13:41

ooohh noooo they're coming after us
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 21st 2010, 6:21:44

can he stay untagged the whole reset and end up top 25 or top 10 even? would that be the first time in alliance history that a country stayed untagged and ended that high? or would he need to jump into a tag (Laf probably) at some point?
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 20th 2010, 20:44:09

I buy one or two units of tech at a time to test to see if the tech on the market is my tech...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 15th 2010, 2:02:44

haha one of theirs also got untagged before we could finish our retals...and then it was farmed pretty quickly
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 13th 2010, 20:15:27

what's the point in limiting the number of PS to 5? seems like if we removed the limits (and just keep the time penalty), we'd get better grabbing returns and penalize low defense countries more.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 12th 2010, 18:36:50

You really have to get better at this Bauer. It took your 16 country tag 2 days to kill my third best country. It took me and 4 of my already crippled half-dead countries 15 minutes to kill your top country.

Your turn.
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 11th 2010, 21:28:54

haha then why don't you tell your members to stop wasting turns on me...
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 11th 2010, 20:18:15

actually it's pretty clearcut what happened if you look at the news...

i was still involved with my thing with xNTSX.

IMP farmed me a few times without me ever touching them and then did the destroy missile spy ops.

I took 4 retals and pretty much got all my land back.

They didn't like that small tag players actually know how to play the game, so they tried to landkill me.

I took 2 more retals to get land back.

If they really wanted to kill me and weren't playing like noobs, they would know that one of my countries is actually almost dead from civ kills by xNTSx and would've been far faster as a civ kill than a landkill.

formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 11th 2010, 20:09:57

nah i actually only play alliance...so i'm just gonna take land from them til they actually kill me
formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 11th 2010, 20:02:44

i know what a kill run is...and that does not involve destroying missiles...

and i never touched IMP...they decided to destroy my missiles after they tried to farm me...

and if you're going to try to landkill me, at least do it with countries that don't have 0 defense that i can just take land from...

formerly Viola MD

highrock Game profile

Member
564

Oct 11th 2010, 19:56:03

ooohhh btw IMP now decided to try to kill me too after I took all my land back on retals
formerly Viola MD