Jun 18th 2018, 2:24:53
fluff should be number 1. :p Honestly though you should go back further and add han, ucn, and tsa. If you are going to rank by simple server influence over time you should put RD higher regardless of one may think of them. Having said that I think arguing these threads is somewhat moot given most of the people who ran the tags you listed and influenced the politics are not around anymore. I can see why you would put LAF where you did but it depends on your point of view really. During my stint at the “great game” of alliance server politics I would say that IX should be higher on your list. I would say skill and leadership wise they were a bigger deal than laf (at that time). They just tended to be low key and for the longest time were good at not drawing negative attention to themselves. In terms of overall player skill though i would say that laf was better than ix when it came to netting/warring but at least in my era of being in sof leadership IX seemed more determined somehow. As for sol, unlike ix or laf they always seemed to need some kind of boogieman to keep them going. The bigger the boogieman, the stronger sol would get. I wont speak to sof because i am biased:p Would argue you need rival there. So how you rank depends on what you are going to value more: political savvy, netting, warring, server impact through actions?
you are all special in the eyes of fluff
( ._.) -----)-->
(_(' )(' )
RUN IT IS A KILLER BUNNY!!!