Verified:

dhh4zc Game profile

Member
15

Jan 3rd 2012, 19:13:49

Is there any reason or advantage in changing gov'ts after turn 1?

Trippster Game profile

Member
425

Jan 3rd 2012, 20:10:11

Yes.
The advantages for each gov/strat remain until the first gov change. After that the advantages of a gov change needs to be weighed against the disadvantage of loosing 14% (or more if you're big) of everything you have that can't be put on the market.
Ignore the smiley.
I have 10 tabs open.
I may or may not be here.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jan 3rd 2012, 20:27:01

other govts than theo and dict should be used since turn 1.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

diez Game profile

Member
1340

Jan 3rd 2012, 23:43:55

why not theo? It's good :p

diez Game profile

Member
1340

Jan 4th 2012, 1:03:00

Well you clearly forgotten about theo casher then.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Jan 4th 2012, 20:56:25

Originally posted by diez:
why not theo? It's good :p


depends if finances building as farmer or does cash start when low priv food sell price doesn't matter.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....