Originally
posted by
UltraMarines:
Read his post again, and no? If the clan as a whole is against LT(historically), its cool if one of their own jumps on some other alliance lists to play with them? I'm sure he will play fair and just wants some land like the rest of us. But you can see how that would seem fishy right?
There has been examples both by LaFfers and tags we've traded with who've tried to abuse the system. I will only speak for myself and you should not read anything here as "LaF" policy for trading, just my own.
I am a fair trader but not a friendly one. I.e. if you fail a hit on me I will take a retal (and as you can see i my news today, if I mess up, like picking the wrong attack type, I will accept a retal with no fuss). On the same token, if you hit me and end up having significantly less land than me when it's time to retal (either because you had too little land to start with, or because you trade with many people at the same time and don't care about DR) I will try to sandbag you and get two retals according to 80% land:land. I expect the same from anyone I hit if I'm playing like a douche. Also, build your land when you have traded! Not doing so is bad for both of us in the long run.
There is indeed a strong core of LaF members who wants to kill landtrading and demolish tags/alliances/people who do it. I am not one of them.