Countries that use special attacks against a tag should lose the right to be protected by humanitarians.

Proof:
When Iraq invaded Kuwait no humanitarians were uniting against the United States when they attacked Iraq.

if you say countries that use special attacks against a country should lose the right to be protected by humanitarians AGAINST THAT COUNTRY, its still debatable.

against the entire tag? I dont think so.

Seems like it rewards smaller countries that suicide.

Almost all recent changes have buffed suiciders. I think a single small impact nerf to suiciders would be okay.
Unless of course development is intentionally buffing suiciders.

Suiciders are part of this game, just like in real life.

In the alliance game, it should be a standard practice that what one player does while wearing that uniform, there should be consequences for his alliance mates to some degree. After all, you are both wearing the same uniform. Thus, when you have one player decide to play like a douchebag, there should be consequences for that alliance he belongs to, not just strictly him since some portion of his ability to become such a Douche in the first place stems from the collective established by the alliance.

So, in the situation that the MI when it first formed, if one of ours got farmed by an alliance member, our player would look in his scores list and hit a player of the same tag for the land back. Simple enough, and the other alliance player could take it up with his larger buddy about it. This led to more players being better led, and trained by their respective alliances.

The policy was pretty simple too. You were entitled to strike as many strikes as you had taken, 1 for 1. There was no hit me twice, get hit back three times and all that other bullfluff, it was straight up, one for one.

Provided a healthy environment on 1A, 1B on the other hand was completely outta control. I'm sure that some of you who may have been around then will remember.

would be good for killing off tiny lil wallers