1	Tmac (#40)  				47,674	$82,913,572	HG
2	I went down to the sacred store (#79)  	43,879	$66,670,985	HG
3	Trex (#12)  				56,453	$51,350,860	CG
4	l e e k u a n y e w (#60)  		51,574	$40,421,263	HG
5	John Doe (#25)  			25,708	$34,090,238	HG
6	How Fat is Kelly Clarkson Return (#7)  	18,587	$31,438,995	HG
7	Avenger (#3)  				52,366	$24,717,772	CG
8	Weedylar Netgaining Alliance (#2)  	16,771	$22,680,331	CG
9	Boleh Land (#10)  			29,157	$22,403,856	HG
10	ASTRAL (#9)  				29,032	$21,585,312	HG

Congrats Tmac on a nice farmer finish and MILORD for snatching that last T10 spot, all the rest of the T10, ofc.

Except Nitell who missed par on the OP strat by about 60m NW. :P :P :P

Bot got 12th, we need to step it up people. Less fighting between us and more netting or the AI will take over!

Congrats Tmac on first! Great farmer finish.

Everyone got grabbed this set but still good finishes from the top 3.

(I botched my destock as usual - bought out most of my PM after the monarchy switch but before the theo switch. Bummer!)

Thanks guys. Farmer ran pretty smooth and easy here. Grabbing was kind of crappy this set though.

Theo Farmer?

No no, I switched to theo last minute to destock.

Lies, it was a theo farmer so you didn't need to spend so much on agri tech! :P

At some point we should have one of those challenges (since seasonal leaderboards arent here yet..... hint hint)

A rubbish pairing of govt type and strat - see who does best

The problem with those ones still remain. that whoever doesnt participate if we do say a 10 man casher challenge, even as tyr cashers the tech prices or military prices could easily make for a free NW record that might stick.

We could pair players instead on legit strats, but randomize it. Then do that 2 sets in a row where no one plays the same strat twice.

Say we have 9 players so we randomize it to

Cashers- Gerdler, Tmac
Farmers- Rob, Nitell, Molotov
Techers- Slagpit, Superfly
Indies- Kingme, Cordy

Then next set its

Cashers- Rob, Slagpit, Cordy
Farmers- Tmac, Kingme
Techers- Nitell, Gerdler
Indies- Molotov, Superfly

Then we are scored by (NW1 + NW2) x RF1 x RF2

Where RF1 and RF2 are multiplication factors that are applied to our score if we get the highest NW of the ones with the same strat. Could be like 1.3x if there are 2 players of a strat, and 1.4x if there are 3 players. That way if you end up being a techer on a horrible techer reset you can still win the entire challenge if you win both your sets.

It would be quite simple to put up a sheet.

Or just do a 1 set challenge with randomized strats and score us based on (NW * RF)/ "Strat specific NW potential" as calculated by the 5 best of that strat in the previous 5 resets.

If we all have to play the same strat it will be total crap for everyone including most those who dont participate in the challenge.

While I agree Gerdler's suggestion is a fair competition, and the tradeoff of Rob's suggestion is someone else might create a nw record that'll stick, I'd much rather see as many people as possible play fasc casher or commie techer.

My guess is one of the rubbish strat guys still win.

you cant compare the two tho... Commie techer is decent, is like a monarchy techer with some disadvantage and some advantages. Fasc casher is horrible, but we already did tyr casher. And no, no one will win with a Fasc casher. :)

Is the worst possible strat Tyr Casher and Fasc Casher then?

I mean we don't have to play absolute horrible strats, just unconventional mixes.

hi guys. i m up for any for these suggested.

sounds fun and i think at least we balanced out the market ish so not to create any severe advantages for anyone.

Don't be so sure, I just won with theo farmer!