Congrats ANON and all involved, it seemed fitting:

http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/...i-doj-entertainment-sites

This seems to fit:

<div style="padding: 3px; width: 400px; text-align: center;"><object width="400" height="334"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/...t;</param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3A6ar44Ecec?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="334"></embed></object></div><a href="http://www.lyricsfreak.com">Lyrics</a> | <a href="http://www.lyricsfreak.com/t/talking+heads/">Talking Heads lyrics</a> - <a href="http://www.lyricsfreak.com/t/talking+heads/burning+down+the+house_20135067.html">Burning Down The House lyrics</a>

http://www.youtube.com/...ailpage&v=xNnAvTTaJjM

hackers and pirates and thieves, oh my!

I think Anonymous prematurely blew their wad on this one. There do in fact seem to be some credible charges involved in regards to Megaupload, and personally I don't see this as a censorship or freedom of speech issue at all.

Anonymous is just TOO anonymous in my opinion, and I am skeptical and don't quite believe that the damage they cause is actually caused by 'the average anonymous supporter', but rather that Anonymous itself is part of a conspiracy for lawmakers to have *something* to point a finger at and even further revoke our civil liberties.

The 'organization' of Anonymous is just too convenient and shouldn't be trusted as much as they are. They give the good people, who are actually advocating for positive and progressive changes a bad name.

Hey GE!!!!

anti-ism

I have a hard time supporting the co-ordinated attack on free speech, as the gov't is/has tried to and obviously its not just here in the US. We give the big hurrah for those that use it to protest/overthrow the governments we don't like, while try to contain its freedom here, for real? SOPA/PIPA

http://www.guardian.co.uk/...ding-ground?newsfeed=true