Apr 16th 2011, 18:39:23
slagpit
i was hit yesterday and got the following message
a country from (X) invaded your lands
you lost
234(419)acres gained
655 buildings(348 stolen)
when i looked at my country i had lost 234 acres but no buildings were missing
this happens frequently and was first reported many months ago
as to my statement about hitting high NW countries, you say it is not correct? there is a penalty that is undisputed so i can only assume you do not consider it a large penalty, that is subjective. or perhaps you do not consider it a penalty but merely a lessened return. whatever you call it, however you phrase it, fast growing countries are protected from countries that take their time an invest in LG potential.
i was hit yesterday and got the following message
a country from (X) invaded your lands
you lost
234(419)acres gained
655 buildings(348 stolen)
when i looked at my country i had lost 234 acres but no buildings were missing
this happens frequently and was first reported many months ago
as to my statement about hitting high NW countries, you say it is not correct? there is a penalty that is undisputed so i can only assume you do not consider it a large penalty, that is subjective. or perhaps you do not consider it a penalty but merely a lessened return. whatever you call it, however you phrase it, fast growing countries are protected from countries that take their time an invest in LG potential.
FoG