who said that was the reason? did i say "LaF cancelled the pact with evo because they didn't act on 66% super majority?"

i don't know exactly why, but i can see a few parts that ss might have excercised which could be valid

the 50% majority which can go both ways (so i really hate arguing on this one)

or the

Alliances in the coalition will not sign UNAPS or DP's with "warring clans" unless they provide UNAP/DP to all in the coalition; warring clans may be those commonnly known as "warring clans" or those listed before the set & pacting begin; if an additional alliance becomes a problem they may be listed for futher inclusion in the "warring clans/aggressors".

and you did admit you have a pact with SOL, but we did last reset also so it is kind of wishy washy (as you could've broken it on the same grounds last reset).. but it still doesn't remove it as a valid reason too.

would i make an exact answer? well its 1am here and ss is probably sleeping right now so i won't know until i ask him if you really cared that much :P