May 5th 2012, 0:54:45
TC's country this set had 10 million troops added to it. Clearly sufficient for deletion. What evidence caused the other countries to get deleted? Were the countries from past sets retroactively deleted for cheating, or merely because it was possible/probable that they had cheated? Is it even possible to have evidence from that far back to determine whether or not they had cheated?
If all that is needed is that it merely be probable that someone had cheated, why have JJ23, smlandau, and Vivanick not had their top countries retroactively removed from the primary and express top lists as well?
It is rather frustrating that the burden of proof required to get someone deleted in primary has been set so extremely high, yet LaF countries from previous sets have been deleted because of proof that they cheated in a different set.
If all that is needed is that it merely be probable that someone had cheated, why have JJ23, smlandau, and Vivanick not had their top countries retroactively removed from the primary and express top lists as well?
It is rather frustrating that the burden of proof required to get someone deleted in primary has been set so extremely high, yet LaF countries from previous sets have been deleted because of proof that they cheated in a different set.