Actually, correct. My statement is that game B is the game to be in if you want to play into game A. I may have truncated it this time, but it is my long standing comment.

Last set it took under 10 mil net to mak the top 10 in game B. The set before the threshold for top 10 was over 5 million net less than 10th place in game C. The set before that it once again took under 10 million net to make the top 10 in game B.

Because so many good players relish the thought of total chaos and smacking each other around, they purposely place themselves in game C to play each other. There are more than a few very good game C players who instead of advancing choose to start over set after set, and if placed in game B, will delete until they get placed in game C.

Of course you did very well in B. It's the weakest tourney game by a long shot. Talent automatically rises to A, and a number of very good players force their way into game C every set to be psychotic with each other (if that's fun, abolutely more power to them)

I would want to play in B as well. Much easier to dominate and run away with getting a very impressive core. Not saying complete cake walk, but much, much easier. You are virtually guaranteed to get into the Majors from game B, it a lock. Not necessarily the case in game C.

There is far more talent in game C set after set as players force the system to be in game C.