Jun 30th 2012, 10:06:47
I dont want to have to be the negative nancy again, but when changes like this are made someone has to point out the obvious.
This change is completely contradictory to changes you've made earlier, as it significantly reduces the ability of an alliance to eat a fs yet again (a very bad change)...
Stonewalling ability will only go up for people already prepared to war, meaning that your fs will still demolish people, and then wall the cs better than before.
So if anything the extent to which a FS is important is disproportionately increased due to the increased difficulty of kr's after the fs.
So essentially it's a good change on the assumption that all wars are equal and pre-arranged, but a terrible change based on how all alliance servers actually operate in this game.
As far as I go its a pretty horrific change.
This change is completely contradictory to changes you've made earlier, as it significantly reduces the ability of an alliance to eat a fs yet again (a very bad change)...
Stonewalling ability will only go up for people already prepared to war, meaning that your fs will still demolish people, and then wall the cs better than before.
So if anything the extent to which a FS is important is disproportionately increased due to the increased difficulty of kr's after the fs.
So essentially it's a good change on the assumption that all wars are equal and pre-arranged, but a terrible change based on how all alliance servers actually operate in this game.
As far as I go its a pretty horrific change.