Dec 29th 2012, 21:37:31
Originally posted by Serpentor:
Me too.
I would think she'd see all that before she started deleting though... Maybe that's hopeful thinking. I guess a moderated server is up to interpretation of the moderator. Send her a message when you attack so she knows its not coordinated. She'd probably understand. Communication does wonders for understanding and then she doesn't have to draw her own conclusions. I dunno.
I would think she'd see all that before she started deleting though... Maybe that's hopeful thinking. I guess a moderated server is up to interpretation of the moderator. Send her a message when you attack so she knows its not coordinated. She'd probably understand. Communication does wonders for understanding and then she doesn't have to draw her own conclusions. I dunno.
Yes, but it is coordinated to some degree. I'm much more eager to war him because I know he's been stealing from other people, and I'd be much more eager to GS or BR him, if someone else was doing it, too. In fact, I would only GS him if I knew other people would join in.
But to me, the difference maker is that he picked the fight with me. I would have a problem with people jumping in who he hadn't provoked, but I don't have a problem with people organizing against a common enemy.
But my standard is different from the moderators. If someone picks a fight with two people, why shouldn't his two enemies be allowed to work together? I do see why a third person shouldn't be allowed to jump in and help, but I don't see why people who have already been brought into the conflict shouldn't work together.