Sep 25th 2010, 0:18:46
the burden of proof against a person on probation is slight
many a man rots in prison on less evidence than this because they were found to be in violation of probation
if LaE were not already a convicted criminal enterprise the burden of proof on an accuser would be beyond a R.D.
but because of their past, just as in anlo-american law
the burden for explaining why they are holding a smoking gun shifts to them
many a man rots in prison on less evidence than this because they were found to be in violation of probation
if LaE were not already a convicted criminal enterprise the burden of proof on an accuser would be beyond a R.D.
but because of their past, just as in anlo-american law
the burden for explaining why they are holding a smoking gun shifts to them
FoG