Verified:

Pang Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5735

Oct 6th 2010, 0:02:20

Originally posted by Thomas:

And just because LaF doesn't have a history of continuing a war beyond 1 set, doesn't mean they're guaranteed not to. Lets face it, most of Earth felt LaF was the best overall alliance. Since they were beat badly by SoL, that opinion has changed. If they ever had a motive to do so, now would be that time.


That was never a label we gave ourselves, it was one others gave LaF. We never claimed to be the best fighters, so you're surprised that a fighting alliance that got the drop on us beat us? Or are you claiming that LaF can't net now either because we lost one war? :p
LaF's never really cared about stupid labels like "best alliance" as much as we just care about netting titles... which is why most folks there, including me, play there :p

but like I said, we can rehash the same argument we had 3 weeks ago, or we can discuss the topic that I presented in my big post you didn't notice (apparently twice now :p) which discusses the lack of "world wars" over the last year or two

it's actually an interesting discussion worth having, and needs some more war-oriented opinions for sure :p

Edited By: Pang on Oct 6th 2010, 0:22:24
Back To Thread
See Original Post
-=Pang=-
Earth Empires Staff
pangaea [at] earthempires [dot] com

Boxcar - Earth Empires Clan & Alliance Hosting
http://www.boxcarhosting.com