EE PatronJul 7th 2019, 4:09:31
Originally posted by Gerdler:
It means only 2-3 tags can get it in every era. Makes it a bad definition. Why does members have anything to do with netting anyway? If you are the best netters on the server you will get anw, if you got some quantity as well you get TNW. But if your best netter is not as good as the best netter in other tags you dont get 1st rank. Netting is all about qualtity of play not quantity of play.
Can you show me a tag that has taken ANW and 1st in membership but not TNW? If not then its a double crown because one of those crowns are utterly pointless.
1st rank, ANW and TNW each requires different netting qualities, so winning them means you have three netting qualities better than anyone else who netgained that reset.
Can you show me a tag that has taken ANW and 1st in membership but not TNW? If not then its a double crown because one of those crowns are utterly pointless.
1st rank, ANW and TNW each requires different netting qualities, so winning them means you have three netting qualities better than anyone else who netgained that reset.
Meh. Solo tags dont get bothered tho anymore. In a set where a great netter posts up a 700m nw avg or something solo, it becomes damn near impossible for a tag with a few members to touch anw. Sin will probably cost ICD a triple this set himself even tho they obviously deserve it and are clearly ripping everyone apart on stock. There's no measure that works.
In the way that 1a is adjusted to a minimum of tags being /10 players, and team /5, ffa should be /64 to get a REAL measure. Otherwise triple crowns are purely based on whether or not a good player runs solo or not.
Honestly every triple crown ever could have been beat by rebelnbk running solo any set. All of them. He only does like 450m avg which isnt even spectacular, but its enough to be above any tag that has ever tripled. Ever....
Triples nowadays are purely a measure of luck.