Aug 21st 2019, 22:07:47
Originally posted by archaic:
as long as its a few % higher than your team mates when a suicider is choosing his targets . . .
Not only that but if cd was narfed all the way to 2%, were still only talking about under 2m troops per 10. Should be peanuts to a well stocked country. They'll have no trouble rebuying whatsoever.
To put things in terms of oil rigs, and a sell price around $150, were talking about less than 7k acres in buildings. Meaning i can replace 2m troops per day with just owning 7k labs/rigs/farms. It's not significant enough to effect what a country over 10k acres can replace even at 2%....
A country taking 35 CDs per day would need only about $80m per day less to replace troops back to 10m if it were 3% instead of 4%. I hear your point I suppose, I just don't think it is significant enough to give a fluff....seems like a small issue caused by solving a larger issue.
If dropping CDs to 3% is a hard pass tho, I think changing the way spy power is calculated and spy expenses to the above formulas would only serve to make wars both less endless and more in the spirit of the old rules where building a good war country used to matter. Since anyone can hit anyone endlessly now, wars have a lessened point.