Aug 2nd 2012, 14:34:40
Yes, we can think of many things he "might" have done, and they would all be cheating. I have not heard hanlong's side of the story because he hasn't made his side of the story public. I believe Pang said that hanlong admitted to him to having the access.
I won't even dignify your other statement with a response.
admitting to have the access is different from adding other stories in it. saying they would all be cheating means you already jumped into conclusion without knowing the exact truth, even without the attempt to hear the other side of the story. that is, again, according to your conscience and it reflects your personality. but i'd love to hear also from hanlong. bad thing is that he got banned immediately and was not given the chance to explain himself in public. or might be that he was publicly disgraced on AT by "other people" that he thinks there is no need for him to explain anymore. that, we don't know.
also, to note that it was only for a limited time that hanlong accessed the db. that can be confirmed by the threads i quoted from the admins. other than that specified time, the admins says he did not access/attempt to access the db.
again, we can speculate a lot of things that might have happened. but that doesn't prove that we are right. even the admins don't make such statements.
What do you think he did while he was logged into the EE DB? With his Boxcar access?
I'm not saying he specifically did one thing or the other, but I cannot think of any action he could have taken that would not be cheating.