Feb 1st 2014, 21:52:22
Originally posted by aponic:
justtaint: It isn't my intention to spin things. It is my intention to make some progress in the areas that I set out to when stepping back into leadership. That is reducing stagnation in the flow of politics on the server and improving relations for SOF across the board. Those are both very broad goals. In terms of the alliances listed in my second post on this thread, I have reached an end point largely in that there is no discussion. The discussion has stopped because there is a constant ultimatum being issued for us to remove parts of leadership. In terms of MD, who is separate from issuing that ultimatum, discussion has stagnated due to an inability for us to contact one another, either due to my limited availability or the limited availability of MD leadership.
If I am missing your point here, please try to spell it out for me so it can be addressed.
If I am missing your point here, please try to spell it out for me so it can be addressed.
Sof dictated server wide policies and imposed their will on any alliance that they perceived to be breaching their rules. In a sense Sof did exactly what they are complaining about they tried to run the other alliances.
For Sof now, to come out and request discussion but also want to dictate what is required for pacts, is remarkbly ignorant of the minimal political clout Sof have. Aknowledge that you have lost and be gracious about it, you no longer have the numbers to back up the arrogance that your members continue to exhibit.
Finally if you can't agree, fight. Sof is supposed to be a war alliance after all.