Verified:

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 24th 2011, 16:44:34

HAI

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 23rd 2011, 18:18:18

Where do you play Future?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 23rd 2011, 15:53:00

<3

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 18:17:27

I respect your opinion hanlong. It just doesn't fit this situation....or maybe it does...

We aren't going to go DPless in a game where wars are made for no reason. It seems to me SoF felt they were going to be hit. Wether or not they really did this heart of heart, back and forth, not to hit us is based on there word. Helmets a good dude and I have played this game just as long as he has. I have no reason, from seeing how he has conducted himself over that time, to think otherwise.

However, to hit a DP of an alliance you feel is going to hit you, and you yourself aren't the attacking alliance on that foe tells me that YOU guys did more planning than this "coalition".

..not to mention hanlong..you point DOES hold weight...seeing as we went to SoF to pact..

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 18:02:34

If your leadership felt SoF was in danger why did you not hit SOL?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 17:31:51

SOL didn't renew your FDP. Your leadership felt RD was gunning for you. So, your strategy was to get MD-LaF-LCN to hit them for you?

You felt there was a "coalition against SoF" so you decided to make a coalition on SOL? That seems political. Wether or not its on AT is just preference.

I'm not looking for an argument. Just a straight answer.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 2:04:18

Yes. It was fact. Cause we were netgaining.

Im pretty sure 3 alliance nailing 2 would certainly get the job done. You wanted to hit someone so you hit. Lets just cut the fluff and call it for what it is.

You guys wanted SOL taken out.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 2:00:19

Bring it

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 1:44:01

First off..SoF did what they felt they had to do. Fair enough. I didn't like cause we WERE fluffIN NETGAINING. We got hit to not enter the war..and once we were hit..we ENTERED the war. So you puppet comments is idiotic at best. Know what your talking about before you come running your mouth dipfluff.

Spin it how you must. Say this, say that. If you don't care don't come share useless retarded yuck mouth posts that have NOTHING to do with the situations.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 22nd 2011, 1:31:38

I love that song though

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 20:52:54

That's my point.

No reasons for name calling LS.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 20:45:23

Well you know where to find me I like you and want to talk.

FutureGhost, what?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 20:28:35

However phrased its still along the same meaning. If we were not to enter..made it clear...yet still got hit..wouldnt it cross our minds, slightly, that if you aren't to listen to what we say how can we assume you won't try this in the future?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 19:41:05

What was discussed. I would like to know. Couldn't hurt to chat. I like to chat with interesting people.

Unlike FutureGhost..who obviously if fluffing retarded. FACE MUST PUT ON A BACK ALLEY.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 19:28:49

Are you saying you are going to hit us again?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 18:49:51

I thought me rubbing you should be the only reason

GO NINERS!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 18:47:24

SoF I believe

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 17:59:17

Dont worry about what we do FutureGhost.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 17:41:20

top

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 17:36:51

Originally posted by Lord Slayer:
When it comes to EE, Netting is a 2 way street. Just because you say or actually were netting, when the wars start comming out, and there are FDP's getting hit, it doesn't matter if your netting or not, because a netting set can change over night, as NA probally found out:)


Yes more so when you ACTUALLY WERE GOING TO NETGAIN AND NOT WAR.

Sorry I love caps =)

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 17:29:46

I LOVE COOKIES

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 2:48:36

PEAK is 68 we are at 65!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 2:46:47

Good point Marco

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 21st 2011, 0:30:58

Why would we prepare for war when we fully geared to net?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 19:01:55

Whos burning the bridge Chevs?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 18:36:11

Political Rallys for war are a bit different then grabbing issues =)

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 18:27:56

I guess cause SoF was always lower

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 20th 2011, 18:10:47

I fail to see what llaars past has to do with right now?

We didnt back away from SOL. llaar had us on a path this set to keep gaining and rebuilding membership.

SoF hit because they didn't want ANY CHANCE of us to hit. Which was the case..because were fluffing weren't going to.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 19th 2011, 15:35:37

Originally posted by Sifos:
Honor is a bull-fluff concept, if you have the power to wipe out your enemies, why wouldn't you?


We didn't plan on it. That is our point.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 19th 2011, 15:32:34

The most we did was go on alert when our allies went to war. That's as far was we went. We planned on netting since mid-reset last set.

I don't disagree with your plan to hit. Makes sense if you are looking at it from your view point. However, if you are being told we wont hit, do not have plans to hit, clearly are not built to hit..how is that beating us to the punch?

I look forward to hitting everyone =)

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 19th 2011, 5:39:45

I'm not sure how many times we had to say we were netting. I guess SoF needed a reason to war.

Good luck to LaF. Much Respect.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 18th 2011, 17:59:57

When alliances are this size I can understand the decrease in power of the FS.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 18th 2011, 3:18:24

LS Hi

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 18th 2011, 0:30:05

Give them time to get there story straight as for a reason.

=)

Good luck to those in SoF.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 17th 2011, 15:33:29

earth / at-archive / mehul is a nice guy
RecklessZT
New Member Dec 18th, 2007 21:53
Really down to earth!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 17th 2011, 15:29:01

answer me gmail invite!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 17th 2011, 14:21:29

tops

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 17th 2011, 14:18:12

Originally posted by crag:
dagga you sound like NA. number of clans have nothing to do with a gang bang. if ya got 100 white girls and 100 guys it dont matter if 30 of the guys are asian 30 are white and 40 are black its an orgie not a gang bang. now if you have 100 white girls and 50 asian girls then call in some black girls so ya got 200 girls and 100 guys you might be able to call that a gang bang.

and i recall seeing some hits on rd in there and im sure they gonna jump in. so its 2vs3 learn to count


Azns dont sex.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 17th 2011, 1:19:47

How are gangbangs justified now?

Old Grudges? Collaborations?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 16th 2011, 23:35:35

LOL any reason yet?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 16th 2011, 0:26:36

COME IN AND CHAT

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 15th 2011, 21:57:15

lol

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 14th 2011, 20:00:31

Originally posted by NuKeR:
TAG UP OR DIE!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 14th 2011, 4:31:29

Yes and it was by a guy at a club in jersey..

Can i kiss your face?

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 20:58:32

<3 YOU!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 20:45:23

As do I!

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 20:38:00

Best was reaching 40k Attacks and over 60k defends back in '06. When I started in TIE in '99 me and an old TIE member started saving our stats.

Worst...well..I'm sure you all know lol

Also another good one was reaching hFA. It was my biggest goal was reaching that level of leadership.

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 20:32:48

Hmm

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 17:03:02

Happy Birthday

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Jun 13th 2011, 2:35:04

available?