Jan 2nd 2014, 11:45:24
Now as far as this set goes.
LCN hit Rival for very legit reasons.
Rival, cheapshoted us last set. And FS'd us after RD did, an RD that was 2x our size.
We had every reason to hit Rival.
I even sent a message to Rival leadership, stating that no FA, no calling in allies, that we'd be willing to pact multiple sets.
Rival choose another route. I even suggested that Rival not call you in, as they'd only be calling you into a loss.
I can guarantee, that had Rival fought us 1-1, SOF would still be netting unless they FS'd someone.
Now to set things straight Servant last set we FS'd along side RD not after they FS'd you while we were under fire from MD and SOL and almost the entire rival clan had been killed.
Also we didn't only FS LCN we FS'd PDM and Evo too so the numbers of the war were even, though after the RD deletion we took the beatting from you guys and finally CF'd.
Also this set you tryed to bully us into following LCN rules... no one other clan should try dictate to others who to ally and how to play the game ;)
I've seen Makinso play the card of being fair toward other clans ha that's a lot of bulfluff just remember the war against Rival/RD where you forced DK to send SOL FA cos you were loosing, then when you guys couldn't get back in the war with all the FA DK sent you had them join a war they would loose since they had no more stock... How is that fair toward DK???
Also the 1st set i joind EE when SOL FA tryed to force rival into war over retals that were made in a fair way according to policy
And there are many other examples of SOL being "fair" that is just a reminder of how SOL is usually "fair".
Also this set SOL and MD were ready to war right from the beginning of the set just look at how many mono's they had also the country builds that stopped at about 10-14K acres