Verified:

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Nov 5th 2012, 19:00:31

Originally posted by locket:
Pang has told me some of his suggestions I strongly suggest you implement something. Making people tagged isnt a bad idea but an alternative might be that if you are not in a tag of at least 5 people then your special attacks are severely weakened except against countries who are hitting you a certain number of times. Grabbing could go the same way but maybe to a lesser extent.

Imo that would allow untagged people to suicide those who farm them to a certain extent and maybe fully at a certain number of hits and protect people who are not provoking them from it. It would not stop a player from playing untagged successfully either since retals wouldnt be affected.

Also.. please adjust your formulas for building destruction... CS disappear too quick.. I'm just gonna keep mentioning this.


Will you do samething for people farm set after set? Will you decrease power of tags bigger than 20 (why not?) to reduce excessif farm? This idea is totally ridiculous. As i claim from the start.... Alliance leaders have to think about their "rules" and "policies". We had more fun before those special retals policies. Before it was easier to take a chance to win a land exchange, we saw more attacks btw alliances and untagged was not that much farmed. Now you have only that solution to have lands... Untagged are the only "safe" choice. So its normal that you create frustrated players and suiciders. Bring back the old policies (1:1 escalating) and you will see a difference.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Nov 3rd 2012, 21:18:10

after that people are surprise that some players play suicide countries lol. And the game is so political that you don't have any other issue to farm small countries and/or tags. I think alliances leaders should think about it and find something to put the game on is way... it's not admin or game mechanics problem... it's alliances and specially alliances leaders problems with all their rules.

I would like to see the game with the same energy of 99 but without bots.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Nov 2nd 2012, 17:17:22

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
But martian, don't you think the "alliance imposed rules/agreements" came about precisely because of the game mechanics?

For example, L:L was invented because of topfeeding mechanics.

Clan:Country retals were invented because of the introduction of clan tags.

Reps for future production lost was invented because of the game mechanic called "stocking" and the concept of future stock, etc (stocking was invented because of the 2b cash limit mechanic, now called corruption).


Are you serious? and what are you suggest? At some point a game is a game with his rules and "mechanics". I think larges alliances have just forget the goal of this game and created a politic environment which is "who is next to impose his new rule" escalating.

it's not that hard... if you are fat, you should have defense to protect your land. If you have a big stockpill, you should have defense to protect it again. Everybody know that the best way to gain max NW is to build with as less defense as possible. Alliances exist for that... to protect you, retal for you if you can't retal, sign pacts and war if your alliance is abused.

I agree that every hit should be retalled (1:1) and you can play with the delay between hit and retal, but L:L and all those similar "politics", are against of the goal of this game.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Nov 2nd 2012, 11:28:11

players have fun to net, to war and it seems that some have fun to suicide... so why your fun is better than another one? No rules broken = no ban. And i would like remember that EE is a war game... so get defenses and stop crying when someone topfeed or farm you. The goal of this game is to get the highest networth with tools you have in hands (army, tech, acres etc)

The game is now so boring, stupid and brainless... you can't topfeed, you can't bottomfeed, you can't even grab someone in your size cuz anyways they will retal L:L, only way to grow up is to explore all set long... and now alliances don't sign defense pacts or NAP... they sigh "grab agreement"... if you wanna grab, you should have alliances permissions.... lol thats totally ridiculous. The game is not going in the good way. I had more fun to play that game in 99 than now, even if we had bots problems.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 24th 2012, 20:27:01

burp

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 15th 2012, 8:19:28

Quebec has a long history... ok we disdand since 04... but this is a detail :P

And crazydave... i totally agree with you ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 14th 2012, 20:45:43

Well the question should... why Ares members didn't join Quebec? :P

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 12th 2012, 17:37:13

Have fun

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 11th 2012, 18:42:48

lol you are funny.... if the bonus can let me create 100 countries i will ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 11th 2012, 18:09:15

Originally posted by RLintz:
:)
Don't praise yourself too much, we were just slow to start this set.
Until now, you have had a net worth advantage, and low activity on our side.
Now that we have everyone in chat, things will start to change.

I do however admire your efforts. A strong FS, made possible by timing. Good job there.
As for our country count, we are about the same as how we ended last set.


RLintz... i hope things will change... if not you have a problem lol... with all those countries i should be killed before the end of the day. ;)

My memory isn't the best one lol ... i touhgt you have around 50-60 countries last set. Oh well lol.

Hey Zodiac you are too late... i will be tag killed before you join the fun lol.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 10th 2012, 15:08:35

lol looks like that nobody can't handle me... Ares starts with 32 countries and now they are more than 100... i didn't know that i was that strong to need to be all those countries to kill me. ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 8th 2012, 14:40:11

.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 8th 2012, 14:24:54

yeah sure you have... cuz you know that you can't handle me alone or without a total surprise. lol

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 8th 2012, 0:35:06

Well since you didn't created an alliance Tin Man i had to find another target and i wanted to impress RLintz with my FS... I hope i did it... 10 kills with no missile... isn't bad ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Oct 7th 2012, 21:15:38

Have fun!

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 27th 2012, 13:53:11

how can i be sad? we won! the proof are there.

But you still act like an ass. An organized war still need contact. In your post you wrote that you were to look with your alliance. No more news from you after that (it took 1 week before your FS). We didn't know who you were and if you were to hit. So yes it's a blind FS. If you don't understand that it's because you just act for your own ego. And after your FS we had not 16 countries, but 11. (we started with 26 countries, you killed 10 and 5 of my crountires lost their land till 1k.... which i can't do anything excepted to explore and drop all my units cuz my expenses was too high). And since you surprise us well you were 16 vs 11 Thats the facts.

And don't come here to tell me you thought that you were to be killed in few days... first you need a brain (which cleary missing to you) and you know that we weren't in position to hit back. And don't worry for me... i know how to run a country.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 26th 2012, 23:38:25

ohhhhhhhhhhhh look it that ... the moron need some attention lol. you feel alone since you are the only one who still war?? lol. No body tell you how good you are? QC declare victory... the proof is done... nobody can war us in an organized war. You should use low tactics to beat us.

Sad to see alot of players here but nobody can handle in fair war a 2 men tag lol.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 19th 2012, 17:47:39

lol thank you to enforce my point. As you said, you "exposed" that my countries had no SDI and give me the tip that next set to have it. So you were here to give me a lesson, not to have a friendly and fun war. Just to show how good you are and win the war no matter how you do it and give me a lesson instead of contact me and organized something that it could be fun for everyone.

Yeah thats exactly what i'm saying from the start.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 19th 2012, 1:10:16

NO SDI = worse??? lol you are funny
Nerds who try to look big and strong makes me always laugh

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 19th 2012, 0:06:41

oh you are soooooooo good... i would like to play like you... nah i'm j/k, i could never been that much moron.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 17th 2012, 22:02:14

to come here taunt me that you will kill my country is trying to show how good you are... but you are not. I don't know how many times i explained and you still don't understand... show again how moron you are. I said i didn't buy SDI cuz the alliances we were looking to war didn't have missile. So i don't give a fluff to buy SDI. I will buy more weapon and spy tech. And yes the war is unfair , but as good moron you are you don't seems to know what organized or war arrengment mean. Sure you could have fun with my team mate... he still have countries which he can have fun. A friendly war is a war which you have a minimum of communication before the war and which you will set "rules" not hitting when you want.

Go somewhere else with you little ego. What i learned from that events it's if i look for a war i will just hit someone without advise and that's it. Atleast that time i will have some "fun".

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 17th 2012, 21:26:17

yep exactly what i said... a moron which needed to fill his ego... thanks to proof it Zodiac. (well you proof it again)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 23:55:32

What you want to proof?? that he didn't contact me? it says when he will hit? he shows his countries before the FS? the thread show only that he had an interest... but if you read the first post of the thread it's wrote

Originally posted by Zoomer:
nobody interested in an amical and fair war against a 26 countries tag?? if interested pm me :)


"IF INTERESTED PM ME"

To say i will war you doesn't mean that is an organized war.
Open your eyes, read it well, if you think you understand, read it again just to be sure, analyse and maybe you will see the evidence that is not an organized war but a totally blind FS with all these advantage ( FS, turn stored, not indicated which countries were to be the opponents) this is has nothing with an organized war.

So stop to show that you are not that smart... it makes you look really bad.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 22:41:34

lol wow if you fight someone with no missiles you will buy SDI?
oh well do it but in my case i will buy more weapon and spy.

Its why i wanted an organized war (see i wrote it again) it's to see what i needed to buy and get prepared for THAT specific opponent.

I don't know for you... when i buy an insurance... i buy it in fonction of my needs... if i have a new car i will take a full insurance... if i have a 10 years old car i will take only civil insurance.


Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 22:35:40

Synoder you are funny... i understood what you wrote... but it seems that is YOU which he doesn't understand. I didn't do a mistake... and i weren't unprepared.

I was unprepared for Zodiac... but he didn't organized the war as requested... he just FSed for a total surprise.

Damn how many times i will need to write "ORGANIZED WAR" before you understand?

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 22:29:30

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
I would kill his tag just for being stupid throwing insults, but i have respect for the other guy in his tag, so ill byte my pew pew finger...


lol seriously you feel insulted?? And what about all of you who comes here and tell me about my preparation after i explained my point? You think you are not insulting me? You think you look smart because you tell me that my countries was unprepared cuz i had no SDI when i didn't need it? Maybe i don't write in a perfect english... but i think i write it well enough that you can understand that an organized war isn't to FS when you want... cuz yes it was a blind FS .... when you don't know against who you will war and when... it's a blind FS.

So now be smart and you will not be insulted in return.If you continue to act like a moron that doesn't want understand, well don't be surprise to be disrespected. Respect goes in both ways.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 21:07:41

Originally posted by synoder:
You were unprepare


Originally posted by synoder:
I assume english is not your first language?


Wow you found it yourself? Your second name is it Colombo?

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 20:17:37

That's exactly what i means by morons wanna look smart... Synoder is the perfect exemple. Hey i'm not surprise to see another one ;)

When you will know what means organized ... you will be able to come here and say something... till that.. take a dictionnary and learn.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 15:58:29

Seriously... this game hasn't changed since i left 6 years ago... so many morons in AT (or FFAT). So many of you think are so smart... but if you can't understand (or maybe the problem is that you are illiterate) something that it was explain to you several time... well you are not that smart.

What are you trying to proof KoHearts? I will re-explain it again just for you... I looked for war, YES. But an ARRANGED (organized) war. That means, contact me and we will fix, who will be a part of the war, when we will do it and how we will do it. Till now you follow me or i already lost you?

So in the other way is doesN'T means, create a tag 2 secs before FSing, FS when you want.

I was looking for a friendly and fair war. if i was looking only for war, i had blind FS somebody and i could now proclaim myself as a "god of war".

For my lack of SDI, if we had organized our war, sure my countries have been full SDI. THAT'S THE REASON I WAS LOOKING TO GET A WAR ARRANGMENT. Why to spend all my money in technologies if i don't need it?

I was looking to hit someone else which he had 10 missiles in the entire countries... i can leave with that and i don't need to buy SDI. It would be a "standard" units war.

I don't make excuses. I don't need to make excuses cuz it an evidence that Zodiac acted like someone needed to fill his ego and blind FSed us to proof that he has no war skills.

So now if you can't understand those facts, well you are not that smart that you pretend.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 14:40:03

Originally posted by RLintz:
Win or loss, awesome work.


LOL the way he did it everybody can do it... Come on guys... a guy with full missile, do a blind FS on someone with no SDI and you find that exceptionnal?? Stop to make me laugh.

He acted like every alliance leaders that need to fill their egos. Use all the advantage and say "look at us we are so strong" but in reallity you just hit someone which didn't wait it.

the fact that he didn't PM and didn't tkae a war arrengment as it was required proof me his poor war skills.

it's easy to win a 100m sprint when you start 8.5 secs before everybody.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 15th 2012, 14:20:21

Explain to your member really good what is a war arrangment cuz some could ruin your fun.... ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 12th 2012, 13:05:20

Seriously Tin Man.... i have to re-explain it?

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 12th 2012, 3:18:53

We were ready to FS someone (2 tags) with no missile and i was to send them a message to be ready cuz we were to hit them with the date. We were to let them know who we are.

Now i have only one country which still able to hit and the FS comes from a ghost tag. So no i wasn't prepared to war you. ... it's why i'm saying that we can forget for a fair and FUN war... cuz for me i can have more fun to play with only one country. And next time i will appreciate to be contacted when i request to have a war arrangment... Do you really feel to have a challenge now? The fun should be for both sides ;)

Now i have to do what i can with restarts... :o/

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 12th 2012, 0:38:11

well maybe i didn't express myself in a proper english... seems that PM me if you want war isn't clear enough... sorry for my error.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 11th 2012, 17:59:20

Ok Donny... you want understand what you want...

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 11th 2012, 16:23:04

well since nobody didn't PM me to get a war arrangment, we were looking to hit someone else and we didn't need to get THAT well prepared. it's easy to get people pants down.... it's something else to have a war arrangment. Now it's more 12 vs 16 lol.

i'm not complaining it's just sad how it happens but as i said... i take the challenge ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 11th 2012, 15:07:10

well this is not what a "fair" and "arranged" war mean for me but i take the challenge

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 8th 2012, 15:03:22

it's when you want ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 7th 2012, 15:57:19

well no offense... but i will take my chance ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 7th 2012, 5:33:04

why you don't create a tag and war with us??

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 6th 2012, 6:49:19

36??? Boxcar is not updated ;) last 10 countries are from last set ;) so we still 26 countries :D

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 6th 2012, 6:47:31

well first of all start to contact me :P but for sure if you use missiles against us you will not have a second chance to do it ;)

QC will always accept normal retal... that means SS or PS retals 1:1 escalating. nothing more nothing less....

But as i said.. start to contact me ... here in PM or Ingame #162

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 5th 2012, 15:54:33

lol Whooze atleast you found it by yourself ;)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 4th 2012, 1:19:36

will see.... no pm yet

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 3rd 2012, 21:43:45

nobody interested in an amical and fair war against a 26 countries tag?? if interested pm me :)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 3rd 2012, 13:58:35

.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 2nd 2012, 15:18:19

Donny don't worry for him... imag members start to be really good in restarts countries ;)

But CC it's really sad to kill all those easy lands.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Sep 2nd 2012, 1:59:23

Can you contact me in PM please.

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Aug 30th 2012, 21:41:17

yeah but monsters didn't kill the entire alliance in their FS. in the worst case imag should have around 60 turns per country (turns per day) and i don't know how much countris they had after the FS... i would say 20 (i'm sure they were more) it makes 1200 turns to hit back = 600 attacks. they have no reason to wait a week to see their 1st kill. (new rules or not)

Zoomer Game profile

Member
60

Aug 30th 2012, 21:05:22

Imag stop crying, rules are new for everybody and 5 kills in a week it's really a bad performance from you. that's it that's all.