Verified:

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jun 6th 2018, 8:19:05

asdfasdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Mar 26th 2018, 12:13:42

asdfads

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Mar 25th 2018, 8:24:32

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Feb 17th 2018, 11:17:21

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jan 22nd 2018, 13:04:39

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jan 17th 2018, 9:05:46

adf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jan 15th 2018, 11:01:29

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jan 11th 2018, 2:30:41

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jan 5th 2018, 4:29:46

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 25th 2017, 7:31:52

123

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 19th 2017, 0:17:30

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 13th 2017, 1:29:58

I don't care about your opinions about SoL or Maki, only warring on their terms or only war an easy war. Hence why I never called you out on those statements.

you spun a request to see whether ANY clan wants to do an arranged war set into SoL will hit small clans and avoiding large or "war" clans. Whether I hate or don't hate you is a different story, but I don't talk fluff. Other people also made that conclusion from your posts. Have you apologised for this? point me to that post?

As for the second quote, my interpretation of that post: SoL is butthurt and need to move on. SoL only wars on their terms. If you want an even war, contact a war clan. But SoL won't do that and rather hit smaller tags. Correct me if I am wrong.

You can say that I am correct and see what I would do.

Lastly, do what you want in this game, I won't affect me. For all I care, I am playing this game like how I want to play it.


akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 12th 2017, 6:55:04

Maki said that detail can be sorted out later. For now, he just needs the number.

Back to the topic of derrick spinning everything:
derrick first reply "But nah seriously. Maki won't fight a war he doesn't know going in that he will win. That's why he's poking small netting tags instead of getting beat by Elders again."

derrick second reply "...SoL will only get to war on unfriendly butthurt terms or they will hit a bunch of small netting tags. That's the dynamic they've created due to being all butthurt about how we all do/did business. "

see how derrick tried to spin Maki's question about small netting tag on whether they want to war to SoL will hit small netting tags? Everybody seem to get the meaning of OP, except derrick and elders.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 10th 2017, 5:24:03

good to know that Stones are cosying up to elders.

pretty obvious that derrick is stirring things up, turning a simple, organised request from SoL into SoL trying to bully small netting tags.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 10th 2017, 0:00:14

lol SoL was asking small netting tags on whether they want to participate or not.

elders read it as SoL wanting to kill small netting clans

Attempt to spin or just plain stupidity?

There I talked about SoL. I take bitcoin as payment

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 9th 2017, 15:17:21

It's elders talking about even war LOL

elders FSed a netting clan, elders warred a nettimg clan 2v1

Oh wait, when kits 1v1 against war prepped clan, they lost.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 8th 2017, 4:19:55

Originally posted by Gerdler:
You honestly think me, vic, ebert, gains, relax, DP, ashe, elliot or anyone else forgot how to netgain because of this? :P


I am leaving LaF coz Gerd did not mention me specifically.

LF a clan for next set

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Dec 1st 2017, 22:57:48

af

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 23rd 2017, 4:06:39

what breaking by 104 were your referring to?

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 22nd 2017, 4:09:46

asfasfdfasdasd

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 19th 2017, 22:52:57

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 14th 2017, 1:40:51

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 8th 2017, 1:07:58

fasdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Nov 2nd 2017, 11:25:04

lol Elders just got decimated at what they claimed that they are good at

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 31st 2017, 6:39:29

asfaf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 23rd 2017, 1:29:51

fasdfaf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 17th 2017, 8:08:17

So, if I get this correctly, at some point a member of each major clan was in RD as a colour.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 16th 2017, 5:20:48

There you go. While others would like to maintain the game and the community, Elders intention is clear, as stated by Derrick, this set being offered as an uGFY pact, whatever that is. Either way, history told us that it's just gonna be broken anyway by Elders

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 16th 2017, 4:15:52

Funny how elders, a clan has mentioned "we do wha we want" and "LaF will never net again" and a clan that has done to LaF what Gerd said (corrected for just 1 suicider instead of suiciders) wanted LaF to discuss for an arranged war.

My only reply is GFY. You wasted many of our members' time by breaking the pact while we were all netting.

Derrick, don't even bother acting as Mr. Nice Guy who wants arranged war, etc. Clearly your and your clan's actions to "drive LaF away from the game" by contunuisly trying to ruin LaF's sets didn't work. We just keep comming back with the same number or even stronger.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 16th 2017, 1:13:09

asdfasdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 11th 2017, 3:18:46

All of them are real

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 10th 2017, 23:26:16

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Oct 4th 2017, 1:33:11

1231

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Sep 29th 2017, 3:01:59

What Trump tweeted is not a declaration of war. However it can be considered as a serious threat towards NK. If no treaties or agreements are in place between the two, then the pre-emptive activities taken by NK are warranted.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Sep 20th 2017, 3:41:06

123123

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Sep 15th 2017, 6:01:03

A proper war clan would not sign a pact, hence allowing the counterparts to prep for a potential FS.

A scum would sign a pact, flip and FS a netting clan with a valid pact. Oh wait, we have other terms for that, it's called Elders.

I give you credits though for coming up with different ways of being a scum sets after sets. You trully live up to your name

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Sep 15th 2017, 4:57:42

Once a scum, always a scum. Regardless of how you package it. That is Elders for you. Can't believe that Vic actually bought your words about a pact.

Well done in playing your role! Going with pact breaking to win a war since you can't win a legit 1v1 war.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Sep 4th 2017, 1:18:34

hjkk

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Aug 28th 2017, 1:20:42

uyk

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Aug 21st 2017, 1:35:41

234

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Aug 14th 2017, 3:55:17

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Aug 10th 2017, 4:29:12

asdfasdfasf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 31st 2017, 10:31:28

qew

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 26th 2017, 1:18:49

asdf

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 18th 2017, 1:40:05

what is IRC?

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 15th 2017, 1:52:13

Originally posted by DerrickICN:


And elders would have happily killed laf solo. Its sort of ironic that someone would imply that sol told us to hit laf. I think everyone could at least agree that we probably dont need any convincing to hit them lol.

And we do that, because its fun, and we enjoy it.


I love it that what Elders can do is talk without any action to back it up. More like, let's follow SoL and talk fluff on AT to convince others otherwise.

What is suppose to be a "warring" clan can only hide behind a real warring clan and claim that they are one of them.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 14th 2017, 11:20:27

Originally posted by Elders:
Originally posted by akadeo0o0:
Originally posted by DruncK:
Originally posted by akadeo0o0:
Originally posted by Symbolic:
Originally posted by IgnitionCWG:
Elders likes to wall, why would we give you that satisfaction? Lol


So you will just bend over and let us win?


You may win the Elders + SOL vs LaF war, but have lost the Elders vs LaF war


Looks like a long set next set eh?


Cant wait to steamroll Elders again, that is if Elders arent being a chickenfluff.


You must be from laf eh? We'll take that as a threat :P


If stating the fact means a threat, then sure.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 14th 2017, 0:43:00

They led, lost and now they are following SoL

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 13th 2017, 11:15:41

Originally posted by DruncK:
Originally posted by akadeo0o0:
Originally posted by Symbolic:
Originally posted by IgnitionCWG:
Elders likes to wall, why would we give you that satisfaction? Lol


So you will just bend over and let us win?


You may win the Elders + SOL vs LaF war, but have lost the Elders vs LaF war


Looks like a long set next set eh?


Cant wait to steamroll Elders again, that is if Elders arent being a chickenfluff.

akadeo0o0 Game profile

Member
65

Jul 13th 2017, 4:58:26

Originally posted by Symbolic:
Originally posted by IgnitionCWG:
Elders likes to wall, why would we give you that satisfaction? Lol


So you will just bend over and let us win?


You may win the Elders + SOL vs LaF war, but have lost the Elders vs LaF war