Pact this, pact that.

Who gives a fluff? It's clouding the real issue; LaF's constant gangbanging and fighting dumb wars is driving people from the game and putting the game on a course of never ending stupidity.

Thanks, LaF.

"obviously going to FS you"

Is this the same as..

"we'll just pretend they were going to FS us so we don't look bad"

Wow. You're kidding right?

Ivan, what pact did you have with Rival last set that allowed you to call them in to hit SOL?

Scode makes some good points, but everyone is still missing the point...

Why the fluff is LaF continuing to start wars for no reason? Did it have a rason to fight Evo again? What is the reason? The only thing I have seen is.. we could, so we did.

Why do people accept this bullfluff?

April 2011: LaF leads MD and LCN in gangbang of SOL for no stated reason. Probably because of 1 on 1 war 12 months earlier where they got their ass kicked.

Oct 2011: LaF hits a netting Evo for no reason. It is assumed it was because Evo 'cussed' them in their country names. LaF breaks pact to do so.

Jan 2011: LaF hits a demoralised and continously gangbanged SOL out of protection having prepared from turn 100 for no stated reason apart from reasons they already used in previous wars.

All the while we are focused on what pacts they are breaking and not asking why they think it's OK to just gangbang and hit alliances for no reason?

Ivan you clearly are a retard. You state 'you called them in' and you are correct. You called in an FDP after you made the first strike - why even bother with 'defensive pacts' if you losers (LaF included) define pacts however you want, whenever you want for whatever reason.

It was another douche move from a bunch of douchebags.