Verified:

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 29th 2012, 6:14:59

I think its great actually. Md deserved to be hit. For coming into the server defending laf, who was an agressor. Its called karma.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 29th 2012, 5:58:52

Actually I dont really like evo either. I personaly feel yank is a terrible leader. I just feel as an observer the last ohh every set, that for the last 5 or 6 resets laf have been the server dbags. Especially considering how former laf don pang begged the community to stop forceing netting tags(laf) to war. They stop. Laf goes on 3 set FS spree.

Thats lame. Laf is being like ix now. Trying to dictate other alliances leadetship and policy. Hardly the actions of a netting tag begging for server peace.

Nukeevil believes in pink bunny fluff too.
Anoniem, this game is sick. The players throttle all life from it. One day qz will look at what has happened to an awesome community I was proud to belong to and just pull the plug. Not enough people and stupid laf kills me =p

Edited By: mazooka on Feb 29th 2012, 6:07:10
See Original Post

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 28th 2012, 18:38:57

Aqua =)

Blindside FS of a netting tag is netting?
Facts are what they are. Reasons for actions are debatable. The actions themselves are fact. Laf has been an agressor for 3 resets.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 28th 2012, 18:31:56

Well, in ee as a netting don =p

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 28th 2012, 18:10:18

What? Then you sir are a fool! You probably think the easter bunny fluffs pink eggs in your moms mouth for your easter basket too!!!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 28th 2012, 17:36:47

Three sets warring in a row. You have to be worst don ever. I remember before the wars you dropped members and faed into t10 after claiming laf never fa lol

Laf isnt a netting tag anymore. Laf has attacked three sets in a row. Netting? Haha..whatever man.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 25th 2012, 15:30:12

Why would you give the file to a non laf person to make comments?




Originally posted by hanlong:
let me clarify

you guys seemed confused.

the link sg posted is not the link i found.

the file i found was named #hello.Earth-Empires-1.log

another non LaF person added commentary and sent it to me.

it was then PDFed and reuploaded with that commentary.

sorry about the confusion.

and it sounds like you guys probably shared these logs anyways since you guys are going about asking who leaked :P so i'm pretty sure there's multiple reasons how this log isn't just the property of you 3, as indicated.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 13th 2012, 10:54:21

Haha..darn laf using fast starts again!
/me shakes fist!

?

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 13th 2012, 10:42:49

I think people use troll wrong. Its like some posters cant process information or something and any idea, policy, game change etc. that they disagree with is labeled as a form of trolling.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 10th 2012, 16:47:19

I make alliance lol country too.

Im glad you guys are all cool with this playing style again!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Feb 1st 2012, 20:35:54

Wait,what? Because dagga is agreeing with you, your point is no longer valid?! So all those posts you made about server needs were made in self interest and not for the greater good. I bet you are laughing your asses off in private that people bought into your propaganda.

Originally posted by Pang:
Stop the trolling, dagga.

there's been much laughter in private about how your tone has changed with SoL+ally's political fortunes. you're basically echoing the policies that you flamed me for a year or two ago. it makes you look entirely transparent.

let the server/politics evolve on their own, eh? :)

evo will bounce back because they have some solid leaders there, namely qz. same way laf bounced back, solid leaders. both alliances have a solid vet core and as you boil down to that vet core the heart of the alliance grows stronger. that's what gave laf the strength to come back from what looked to be a parade of endless wars to satisfy the appetite of over-aggressive war alliances.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 12th 2012, 8:25:04

Indeed, and game changes can always be changed back.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 12th 2012, 8:15:00

All the guys working on the game have done a great job with it. Collectively they are a scared bunch though. Adjust more knobs!.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 12th 2012, 3:30:49

Good suggestion dagga.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 22:06:12

Yes I am.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 21:57:54

Hi trep =) I totally agree about the other servers. Send me an intel!

I get that jj, my thinking on it is I dont have to carry any troops/tanks unless I want to produce them. It almost seems like ci is super powered now coupled with selling more units at a time. Even with these low prices, I cant recall having so much tech and money already. Thats with running out of food twice. gdi is the fluff.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 16:01:30

Lol if you think this is a good war, youll really like it when alliance server is down to a few hundred people. All those people you dont like will be gone! Wont that be fun?

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 15:50:40

Pointless war, failing game, bitter people, no fun.


mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 15:41:58

Hi braden, I really havent played ee much. The servers that I have tried are crap. I believe the last primary set I played, my country was killed by some alliance tagmates that I had not hit. That was over a year ago, took this long to try again =)

Jj, no millitary country isnt that big of deal, all the breaks are small anyway. Point was, that the new gdi made me do something I had never done in 11+ years.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 5:45:35

Might get tricky later but its nice now!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 5:37:49

I cant believe how retarded both sides sound. Full retard.

Its like why? Havent you guys trolled eachother long enough. You guys are all lame.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 11th 2012, 0:24:12

First set playing with these rules and I like it! First time I have ever not farmed a 0 military country. Single tap ftw huh!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 9th 2012, 3:26:36

Seems so.
Dagga nailed it already, laf can not compete with evo netting. Guess break/voiding pacts to gangbang evo 2 sets in a row is going to be the norm now.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 9th 2012, 0:48:32

laf being laf. always liars. Always lame. 10 years later and nothings changed.



mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jan 4th 2012, 4:08:15

New set and need allies +bonus post

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Dec 11th 2011, 16:49:30

War this early is lame.

I agree helmet, sof are clearly losers this set.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 25th 2011, 2:54:27

Bobbeh rubbed his junk all up in your face.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 23rd 2011, 7:27:59

...or not

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 22nd 2011, 16:22:42

haha...rival helping laf in a war they started. I bet you the real rival is rolling over on the grave!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 21st 2011, 6:38:36

See, how that worked there? You, showing how awesome cool youre friends are by winning and not trying. Then I come along and tell you im cooler because I try less.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 21st 2011, 6:30:50

Fact : most of my #1s, I stopped caring after 3 days !

IM MORE EHARD THAN YOU SON

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 20th 2011, 4:57:19

can tie\evo\sol trade imag for flamey?

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 18th 2011, 6:14:45

you should still be in leadership.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 18th 2011, 6:01:08



laf vs evo this set could have been a fair fight.
you didnt want a fair fight. you wanted an advantage. you got it by doing what laf always does. you lied.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 17th 2011, 5:59:32

laf is such a fluff alliance.

i cant believe after all these years lafs nuts aint dropped.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 3rd 2011, 6:40:34

She built them all and did well if I recall. Anoniem...777>666 cs start

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Oct 1st 2011, 18:10:55

Hi farmer and you to hoosier =)
Ill never forget me and raheel getting hoosier to build bulk CS back in tehclub. I swear farmer your woman drove me to drinkin! Good times.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Sep 3rd 2011, 9:57:16

Maverick, you sound like an ass. You probably dont know but admins have worked hard to keep alliance tactics out of express. See, pricks used to do what you tried. TV is 100% right, keep your 1a alliance in 1a.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Aug 31st 2011, 21:04:48

I spent so much time with a nintendo, ill be happy to never play any of those games again. Though I loved it at the time. It was like magic after a childhood of atari!

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Aug 7th 2011, 3:01:00

Yes, they should play if they want. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a fluff.
/close thread

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 22nd 2011, 21:43:23

Haha... I would be suprised if any earther ever, smokes like I smoke. Only earther that ever seemed close was cc. Rip bro. Any other humboldt earthers?
Vlad was a beast nettr.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 20th 2011, 16:16:05

I was thinking the same thing martian. Psycho has most 1sts in alliance so he = best ever?

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 19th 2011, 6:22:14

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIPR4OSElEs





"you guys are a bunch of assholes...its not even my birthday"

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 17th 2011, 19:52:06

I played in an alliance on the old game with 30ish russians. Language wasnt a problem really and it was a pleasure getting to know some of those guys. I hope they come over.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 13th 2011, 2:05:12

standing orders were put into the game to combat cheating. before standing orders were in place some people cheated for the same effect.


now its a level playing field where everyone can do it instead of only a handfull. one of the best features added to the game imo.

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 13th 2011, 1:25:03

^ thats how i remember it too. not any major uproar about landtrading.


as i recall a few alliance did it a bit but it wasnt tolerated by others. hell, you got flamed for double tapping untaggs then too though =/

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 12th 2011, 23:58:16

farming is already happening detmer. this is not meant to be free but add a cushion. building,military,cash,food,tech losses still.

the idea being, fb people attack the fluff out of each other but dont do any damage really to other people. even if you kill someone, they come back alive when they start playing again. only noticing they died because they have another death in the total deaths box.

Edited By: mazooka on Jul 13th 2011, 0:02:27
See Original Post

mazooka Game profile

Member
454

Jul 12th 2011, 23:30:13

I was thinking how to make this game more fun for new players and less discouraging.

First idea is this.
explore- have a country only have 5k acres available total to explore.

ie: starting country @ 100 acres can explore 40 acres a turn and has 5000 "available acres" to explore
you explore 1 turn for 40 acres. your country now has 4960 "available acres"

when a country is land grabbed, land is deducted from "aa", building/military loss stays the same.
-
when a country runs out of "acres available" 5000 acres have been explored, it regenerates like PM regen, x amount per turn gained. "available acres" would also regen when a country landgrabs another country.

country has 0 "aa". makes one land grab for 200 acres. country also now has 200 "aa"


so, of course a new tech for "aa" would be nice. or a gov bonus maybe?

i think something like this could be good for everyone. gives noobs a chance to grow a bit and figure stuff out. it gives big countries some protection from "suiciders". could still grab through someones "aa" if your intentions are to harm.

big change i know. i have another suggestion as well but i'l see what kind if any response this gets.