Search For Author: sinistril - Earth Empires Forum

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 31st 2020, 6:57:59

Originally posted by raz:

Originally posted by sinistril:

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

If I was wrong about it being on proxies traveling the world between countries during a travel ban, then ask yourself hawk, why did it get deleted in the first place?

Whatever mod looked at it originally definitely saw what I expected them to see and pulled the trigger immediately.

What mod overruled this delete and why? If the "mod boss" is reinstating his tag mates for rule breaking, I mean, come the fluff on.

I never call mod abuse but this is next level. I have no problem if it's not using proxies and bouncing all over the world during a travel ban, that it gets reinstated (which I highly doubt), but if LI or Warster would have reinstated their own delete, which is customary of any mod who does a delete you have to go to that mod, they would have contacted me and explained why. So im certain this was not the result of an appeal, but rather prime just overruling the mods of a server he plays without even trying to save face and let them do it themselves. That's a huge overreach, imo, and is out of character. Never seen anything like it.

I was told I was correct originally and it was bumping all over the world. So why has no one contacted me saying I'm wrong? What changed?

Either its based in Montreal and bumping all over the world or it isnt. Which is it? Either I was lied to by mods or I wasn't. (Hint: I don't think I was)

I thought macdaddy was from Gatineau or at least not Montreal. Either way, maybe do your own dirty work instead of sucking mod fluff everytime you have a suicider.

Big internet tough guy...Keep hiding behind your computer typing big boy words and trying to act tough little man. lolz

Derrick - He bragged about working a CNL (Canadian Nuclear Laboratories), if its true it is located in Chalk River Ontario.

How was I being an internet tough guy? It's sad that someone as immature as you is allowed to see their kids 2 days a month

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 31st 2020, 6:49:41

Can't really be critical of China throwing doctors in prison when many people in the western world are throwing the baby out with the bath water with regards to freedoms. I'd be more concerned at what's happening in your own country rather than status quo Chinese realpolitik

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 28th 2020, 21:13:30

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

I thought macdaddy was from Gatineau or at least not Montreal. Either way, maybe do your own dirty work instead of sucking mod fluff everytime you have a suicider.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 27th 2020, 20:34:56

You forgot the people that don't attack at all because they need 120/120 to wall with Chevs

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 21st 2020, 0:50:09

Originally posted by Gerdler:

Originally posted by Bug:

COVID-19 Has a death rate of about 3% if 100,000 people get it then 3% are going to die, almost no matter what you do sick/elderly etc. BUT its the 15% of them that will need hospitalization that is the issue, if you keep them home then they add to the mortality numbers, which is bad. so 15% of 100k is 15,000 people all needing an isolated hospital bed with 1:1 nursing staff..

If you look at Korea they got like 1% Case fatality ratio(CFR). They still have a dark figure of people with very mild symtoms who didn't get tested. So the infection fatality ratio(IFR) is probably well lower than this on a population basis with good modern health care.

That said you are completely right that patients who need it wont all have access to good health care if everyone gets sick at the same time.

Your assessment that 15% need hospitalisation is huge overestimation. Imperial College made a very nice table that outlined the needs for hospitalisation, critical care and the IFR based on age groups that they have used as assumptions for their models. They say they are outlining a pessimistic scenario. And the IFR they have used on a population level is 0.95%, 4.4% will be hospitalised for some time and 1.3% requiring critical care for some time.

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/...-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

These estimates were corrected for non-uniform attack rates by age and when applied to the GB population result in an IFR of 0.9% with 4.4% of infections hospitalised (Table 1). We assume that 30% of those that are hospitalised will require critical care (invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO) based on early reports from COVID-19 cases in the UK, China and Italy (Professor Nicholas Hart, personal communication). Based on expert clinical opinion, we assume that 50% of those in critical care will die and an age-dependent proportion of those that do not require critical care die (calculated to match the overall IFR). We calculate bed demand numbers assuming a total duration of stay in hospital of 8 days if critical care is not required and 16 days (with 10 days in ICU) if critical care is required. With 30% of hospitalised cases requiring critical care, we obtain an overall mean duration of hospitalisation of 10.4 days, slightly shorter than the duration from hospital admission to discharge observed for COVID-19 cases internationally

Table 1 is very nice for those who can read.
https://imgur.com/a/d6ufpPa

Treating the virus with respect and not batfluff crazy panic? Pffffft!

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 21st 2020, 0:37:20

Originally posted by Suicidal:

~ a Sui original ~
The answer to why there was a run on toilet paper;
Most understood the concept of "why go to the bathroom at home when you could hold it until you got to work, and get paid for it".
Now that folks are being told to stay home, well, you can figure out the rest.....

Surprisingly accurate

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 21st 2020, 0:35:12

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:

fluff off, people like you that never been in a truck writing guidelines for us is absolutely ridiculous, I've been in this industry for 22 years and half the fluff you posted is complete horse fluff, "lock your bathroom, the driver will find a way", come over here and open your mouth so I can take a fluff in it, yes also let's void the safety regulations and make them drive non stop, yes brilliant, OMG shut the fluff up!

I'm pretty sure he's a truck driver.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 17th 2020, 6:39:54

Man farmer, you put an economic value on life? Everyone knows that the large scale, long-lasting economic ramifications that come from recessions have never lead to anyone dying, ever.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 16th 2020, 2:58:45

Originally posted by Garry Owen:

Actually..... shutting down the internet for 4 weeks is probably the best thing that could happen to happier and healthier life....

https://media.makeameme.org/...nds-like-a-d138e60470.jpg

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 13th 2020, 15:07:24

Originally posted by Chevs:

What are you saying sinistril

I'm saying it's a perfect chance for people to see god and at least learn a lesson so this entire mass hysteria is not a waste

Originally posted by Requiem:

Originally posted by Chevs:

What are you saying sinistril

He says lots of things usually. Unfortunately I never read long posts so it is time wasted with me!

ok?

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 13th 2020, 8:03:13

Not to be cold but...

Coronavirus facts:
Disproportionately kills people above 75+ with pre-existing health conditions (it's not much worse than the seasonal flu for people under 50)
Causes society to shut down despite the fact that the main people affected, for the most part, no longer participate in society
Is easily spread when people congregate together or upon skin-to-skin contact (ie. from shaking hands or kissing babies)
People who travel a lot have a higher risk of being infected

American 2020 election facts:
Every candidate is 75+ with pre-existing health conditions (people under 50 do not usually run)
No candidate has ever participated in society
Every candidate running is grouping people together en masse in political rallies
Candidates are known to shake hands and kiss babies
Candidates travel nearly all day every day

If it was a 5 year old piece of grilled cheese that looked like the "virgin" Mary, people would be praising Jesus, but everyone seems to be blaming either China or Trump here. Where the fundamentalists at?

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 11th 2020, 18:31:39

Originally posted by BROmanceNZ:

Originally posted by archaic:

Take a look at the audience the next time you're in a movie theater. Those are the consumers that disney et. al. are milking for cash. They are perfectly happy to keep feeding the pubbie masses what it thinks it wants in return for a share of those stagnating lower middle class wages. I doubt if Warren Buffet gets out to the Cineplex very often.

Exactly, which means the notion of "white guilt" actually doesn't apply - it's all about the $$$, yeah?

A black female James Bond isn't to appease black feminists. It's because producers think they'll make more money out of audiences pandering to that then they will turning James Bond into a grumbling anti-progressive that people who complain about "white guilt ruining movies" would go see.

So isn't that the market at work rather than some liberal agenda to re-engineer social norms?

Not always. A lot of people assume that every decision must be motivated by money, but movie producers have other concerns, not least of which is their own legacy. If they are true believers, they might think that casting a black female James Bond is a social good. Movie studios do not want to lose money, but they cede a lot of final control over the products they create because most movie studios are multi-faceted and have many projects going on at the same time. No one from the accounting department has ever been credited as a producer in Hollywood.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 11th 2020, 6:38:34

Originally posted by Red X:

he won't do it.

who would? I can't think of a bigger waste of time

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 6th 2020, 21:40:56

Originally posted by Marshal:

1st all femmes gb wasn't that good (compared to orig. movie).

and why jb couldn't be black or female or black female?

Not a James Bond fan, he's a poorly fleshed out character based on a "if Casablanca were a spy" archetype that is boring imo. I don't know enough about his character to say whether being black works or not but literally the only fleshed out part of his character that I've seen is that he's a borderline rapey male. You couldn't make him a female anymore than you could make Lara Croft a male

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 6th 2020, 12:26:01

Originally posted by Jabroni1134:

sfbob what is the "Luck" of your country?

I just ran 20000 turns and only had 3 earthquakes.

Then you were either very lucky or the earthquake formula works differently when you run 20000 turns cashing on a 100 acre country or whatever it was. I am guessing every FFA player in history will verify that 20000 turns and only 3 earthquakes is incredibly unlikely. You can dig up an old EQ thread on FFA and look at the most active posters. I believe UncleFiat usually posts most of his earthquakes in there. But just consider that 3 earthquakes in 20000 turns is saying that you'll get approximately less than 1 earthquake per country per set.

@sfbob
No, it's not worth it.

Edited By: sinistril on Mar 6th 2020, 12:30:13

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 6th 2020, 12:18:13

Originally posted by 87Fresh:

He gets his info from Infowars.com and fails to realize that 2 million dollars isn't much for a first world nation to spend of sexual assault awareness and that Canada and the US easily spend the same.

He's a Canadian who wants to be American and would fight a war for Israel before his own country so it's clear to see where he falls in regards to pointy white hats and robea

It's not about what they were spending the money on, it's about the ridiculous, bush-league results. If they were really concerned with combating sexual assault, they would spend their money wisely. Effective campaigning to raise awareness should actually do something preventative, rather than make sexual violence a complete mockery. As for the Israel stuff, I can tell what type of person you are...

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Mar 4th 2020, 20:22:06

https://youtu.be/pw3e64sosEg

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 29th 2020, 7:57:21

Originally posted by Raging Budda:

The mental gymnastics for self-justification going on this thread is just amazing.

Originally posted by sinistril:

Prophasis

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 28th 2020, 21:13:46

Originally posted by Marshal:

1 reason that it'd be abusable, if 10 countries send 20% of their 1b oil to 1 country then that country would get a lot oil generated units.

actually nm, marshal being marshal

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 28th 2020, 20:32:12

[quote poster=ddd; 48606; 934967]if u really believe i was in imp to spy on u all. then u never really did know me !

i wish i had tagged up nbk to begin with but the timing wasnt right for that, simple as that.

no matter what u believe or chose to believe, i still consider u as close a friend as i have in the world, as wwell as ya missus.

why am i not fighting this war with you?

again simple, i know or suspected prime of abusing his powers for along time and so dislike smegma - biggest bully [suspect he has small penile disorder}

u abused my oldest friend in the game last reset, meaning orion. and killed his countries when he tried to defend himself against the abuse.

same ole fluff smegma!

so what say u lay off the bs accusing me of this or that hawk, u do really know better! [/quote]

Prophasis

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 27th 2020, 18:59:21

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

If you think i have any regrets, you're nuts. I lost 1 country and outed a cheater that probably would have taken longer to get deleted were he not admitting it on the forums. He'd probably still be cheating (and for that matter hitting IMP) if not for what I did, so good riddance I say. Hopefully it'll make the mod tools a priority update.

If losing one country is having a fluff in my mouth, then you sir, have a variety of balls slapping your chin in a kink.com blowbang.

Is Aphrodite dead yet?

Dunno. I don't keep track of her. Would rather eat lead thank think about her very hard. You know exactly what I mean.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 27th 2020, 18:17:06

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Originally posted by Primeval:

Why do you appear to care so much?

Have you ever known me to not? If i play a server, typically I'm very involved in training people, the politics, etc. But also, I've had a country killed by your tagmate so I'm officially balls deep in interest.

Originally posted by The_Hawk:

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

What all do you think the spy man did? NA would have been a pretty obvious call for a blind man, and sin had to rat himself out for the cycled ip delete with jj. It seems to me it wouldnt have mattered much other than hurt feelings....

If you have to ask you are clueless.

We're finally getting somewhere hawk. That's the first time you've accurately depicted my role.

You were suicided because you opened your mouth like a whore in a red light district and mac put his diddy in it. Not sure where the interest in imps business comes from but keep those lips open

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 26th 2020, 6:05:39

holy crap dude :P nice1

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 26th 2020, 3:57:12

Looked like a joke. Everyone knows imag is the best war and netting clan in the game when galleri decides to carry

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 25th 2020, 22:17:02

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Still more mad about prime tagging with you than i am you suiciding me but w/e. Hope you had fun. Also congrats on 80m nw. It seems you are just slightly better than Marshal. You're officially the first person ive seen brag about finishing under 100m.

Also hawk <3. Was kidding haha

His set was much better than any set marshal has ever had. I don't know why you guys are so offended by the fact he might have a decent set. Don't know how many times I have to defend how he was doing that set but it's like the 4th time now lol

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 25th 2020, 19:52:25

There's a lesson buried in here

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 24th 2020, 5:04:24

Originally posted by patriottawnn:

i think crippler leans towards nbk tho...i wonder if icd numbers inflate next set..if they do..i know what to do

*applies to ICD*

But seriously, ICD is the only honorable clan on FFA.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 8:40:35

Why don't you tag solo?

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 8:19:55

why?

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 8:15:27

yes

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 8:11:53

Nice to see you got your voice Rokkie

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 8:04:03

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

xNAx - primeval, uj, ko (hilarious tag with imps leader hiding because he doesnt have the brass to tag with the clan he leads)
Perun - whooze (could go either way)
pink - bomber (thinks prime is an asshole and is accurate. Usually gets sick of prime being a fluff halfway thru and joins the other side)
AoDT - stienburg (cool to see him back imo)
LN - - tmac evo (legendary netter from e2025. Extra cool to see him)
ICP - someone who created a new acct for this set. Likely in cahoots with the other new accts in xNAx. (Therefore imp)
I3H2 - sinistril (anti nbk because his biggest challange these days is apparently Aphrodite. (I think its a made up reason to support imp based purely on rumors about me i think he made up))
FANG - probably macdaddy to suicide me for a day before purple
LOCKHEED - kahuna(<3, imp friendly)
enshula - enshula (netter i like. Happy to see him on ffa. Recruitment goals...)
xXRHXx - SapphireAxe (solo netter)
CHASE - Turbo T (usually also solo netter)
BOOM - SublimeNightmare (IMP)
FDC - Ssj (eh....see the other thread)

It was fun while it lasted tho right?

How am I anti-nbk? I played in nbk last time I played before this. I only have problems with one of their members but otherwise I like most of them. Killing Aphrodite isn't meant to be a challenge, just business. There's really nothing fun left in this game, so I don't know why I'd be going for a challenge here? Especially considering how busy I am, and how much I really did not want to play this set.

And if it had anything to do with you, I'd be after LoC. The "rumors" about you seem to be accurate. *shrugs*

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 22nd 2020, 4:17:29

How has imp made war unenjoyable? You know you don't have to war imp, right? When nbk hit you guys, you didn't seem to have fun that set either despite the fact that you asked them for a war.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 21st 2020, 20:53:43

Originally posted by Red X:

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

If you think that would improve my chances of netting then you're also naive. On 1a it makes sense.

I think it would, I mean look where you are at now...you get griefed every set anyway, might as well make a stand.

The thing is... he doesn't get griefed every set. Why would he make a stand about nothing? The fact that such minor stuff winds up on the boards is just because he has idiots like mob in his clan. If you actually look at the hits he's complaining about, they mostly are minor or did not happen at all. He frames it like he has gotten suicided every set during destock for the last year because someone sent one EM at a country with max SDI. There is literally not a post on FFA talk of any length where he hasn't mentioned it. He knows his complaints are minor, why fight when he can convince you to do it for him, make a bunch of promises to you, have a "you think IMP is toxic? So do I!" conversation with you, and pretend like his hands are still clean.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 21st 2020, 20:47:03

Originally posted by Gerdler:

Is there a TL;DR here I can't read all this.

Derrick is clearly guilty, always. It's just his natural state.

I just wanna know of what this time.

Same stuff he does on 1a, but it doesn't work in FFA politics.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 21st 2020, 3:55:00

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Originally posted by sinistril:

Weezy was in LoC as recently as this summer and was thinking about joining LoC this set, Derrick. I know your timeline is more messed up than a bad time travel movie, but if you have nothing to hide, why lie? Lol

Also, it's pretty clear that LoC does have something invested in IMPs interactions with SOTA, mostly because they're IMP interactions with anyone. Considering mob made a post immediately after those hits happened, which were mistakes from someone that wasn't paying attention not an intentional farm, which caused the retard Aphrodite to freak out, self-delete and Weezy to suicide into IMP. Notice how a similar situation happened this set that did not involve IMP and mob didn't say a word. Why? Because mob is all about sticking his face where it doesn't belong when it comes to IMP.

I just looked because i was spitballing. I see feb 2019 as his last loc set so i guess we're both liars. Unless he used a fake nick to play with me. My 3 years was well over tho. Cant believe it was just a short year ago we swept the top 10. Feel like it was ages ago. I must be getting old.

Also, when imp acts like fluffheads to netters, we often point it out and call SOS. Because it is in fact same old story. Every set griefing us. I'll point it out every time it comes up and it still baffles me that you guys endorse it. Hawk at least has some feels about it. So does iron. It shocks me that you're looking at players competing for nw records getting griefed by your tag and do nothing and say nothing. It sucks man. I'm going to keep pointing it out in the hopes that my friends like iron or people with morals like hawk get it to stop.

But that in no way is an endorsement of suiciding. If you know me at all you know i think that's cowardly esp on netters and esp esp on netters who are my pals.

What makes you think I think anyone is competing for nw records? You know I consider them solo records. Either way, I've seen every clan act like fluffheads to netters on this game except ICD. As for a couple hits here and there, that's not getting griefed and it doesn't ruin sets. I believe that country I did 11 bill with had been suicided that set (or at least one of my countries). I adapted. I didn't post about how that particular player griefed me every set for a long time, in fact, I quite like that player despite the fact that many consider him to be a "griefer". Who cares, really? Being hit with an EM during your destock is better than the alternative of fun wars every set that are only fun for CC.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 21st 2020, 2:00:39

Edited By: sinistril on Feb 21st 2020, 2:04:41
See Original Post

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 22:56:52

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Originally posted by The_Hawk:

Old FFA culture when I started again was you arranged a war with CC and the following set CC arranged a war with you if you liked it or not. Rinse and repeat.

Did that for what seemed like countless sets until I said f it and warred CC untagged for about a year.

New war culture is an evolution. We dont line up like the civil war anymore and fire at each other. Imp utilized old and new tactics to change how ffa is fought. They brought a reinforcement feel to wars. Let your opponent pull their foot off the throttle because they are winning and watch them get thumped by new countries. Does it seem shady? Yup. Is it legal? Yup. Still havent seen rules on how we are to conduct yourself warring in this game.

Imp also allows its members to have a mind of their own. If that means they play solo that's on them. If they hit another clan maybe they had a reason. If they want to come back they do. Others in imp normally pay for it. Like when raz killed one of my netter countries because someone in imp hit him years ago.

Remember this is just a game.

I disagree. No one in imp paid for me and äshe getting hit on destock. No one in imp paid for the 13 topfeeds imp has done on me since joining this server. Those are things I'd definitely war on and have some fun, were i to be able to trust that a buncha untaggeds/solos wouldn't run me off the server for sets afterwards.

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Lol.

I refuse to fight ffa so i know the feeling. Just rely on my reputation. I still get hit once every two years ish but its typically my fault or someone i play with.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:48:26

*drops some figs on the Senate floor*

These figs are from loc, they're still ripe

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:43:53

And who even wants to war if it's going to be a boring set war? That's why I almost never play this game anymore. Set wars are the game killer. I'd rather war for a few sets to give my friends a year of peaceful netting with no one in their right mind wanting to fluff with them. Set wars are lame. Really, why would we want that? Aside from macdaddy and aphrodite, no one on this server is 13

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:41:42

I mean you challenged nbk to a war, got hit, and accuse them of blindsiding you. LoC would not war 3x a year

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:33:51

Originally posted by Red X:

If you have an issue with another tag fight. Win, lose, or draw at least both sides know that the other will fight so maybe, just maybe we should not do this because if we mess with them they will fight us over it.

But that is the thing here, no one wants to really fight like that anymore. They just want to netgain and never have to get dirty. Sometimes you have to get dirty to netgain.

And all of this.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:33:13

Originally posted by DerrickICN:

Originally posted by sinistril:

I would say everyone has had a war here including ones where loc badly outnumbered the other side. Just because you guys dont do war chats doesnt mean you didn't have a war. This isnt 1a culture of fake wars, no one wants it to be but you. The war culture with CC around wasn't one because they had set wars. It wasn't one because they had fair wars. They just had wars, and the culture was either that you die, fight, or quit. The only difference is these days everyone just quits.

Not since ive been leading but maybe you're talking about 2013 again?

I will disagree with you on one point there tho. As hawk pointed out proxy wars, in addition to all this tagging nonsense that used to be policed, and people operating as solos outside their tag to continuously suicide enemies or whatever wasn't how you did it.

You guys actually directly say as individuals that you do that stuff to deter wars on this server. I don't understand how me repeating that statement somehow makes me crazy.

You badly outnumbered imp in the set where you brought cc back. Loc badly outnumbered me. And you weren't that badly outnumbered against nbk.

And I guess you missed the cc era but I caught some of it. The war culture that existed was not any different than now. Imp didn't kill it. Imp killed wars. Thanks to the things you hate, things that you think need to be policed, nbk and imp dont just roll loc every set in the name of war culture. Loc has been the biggest benefactor of the MAD era of FFA. I know you like you pretend otherwise and you'll make 5 posts about how it's not true that this scenario allows loc to exist as a netting clan, but this scenario allows loc to exist as a netting clan.

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

sinistril

Member
2184

Feb 20th 2020, 20:11:43

If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.