no to bots

no need to be sorry for your clanmates actions or my losses. As pop said, there is a risk when you run a one man tagg. As with all things on this big blue rock if you cant protect what you have, its not yours.

Its all good ,just wonted to make sure it wasent my new deodorant making you all crazy. I will give it a go again in a set or 3.

I know a way to keep you from doing that.

was it personal or just needing a few countrys to kill?

killing all untaged or just mine? would also like to thank # 2478 for his /her time. I will do my best to return the time when I can.

I think you are right on the "money ".

Thanks to everyone who has posted I enjoyed your thoughts.


Mad Morticia
To impose one's personal morals and ethics on others is completely contrary to the basis on which this nation was founded.

Is it not your personal morals that you are posting to uphold.? Posting that you have great insite into this subject and then following it with personal attacks on the closed minded ,wasted energy and little knowledge is no less than an unwillingness to deal with the facts at hand.

If its about being happy with the things man can give you that the founders were aluding . why then lead with life and libirty that is not given by man." only the creator can give what man is looking for to make him full of life ,liberty and happiness.--------------not my words only, one of those founders said this---who do you think it was?

This thing was not done in the dark ,each person that had a part is known and can be known,In the same way we know each other now. by what we say and what we do. look them up and see for yourself---I know what your going to find.

uldust. it seems you are under the popular and horribly wrong/misguided opinion that the U.S was founded on christian laws. the "founding fathers" were most definatly NOT bibble thumpers, and CLEARLY stated that religion and state should be separate. and im sure if they were alive today they would be disgusted with what there vision has become

Thanks. Can you please point out where it CLEARLY stats this? I know it is hard to point out as the only place I have found it is in a letter from jefferson to --------I,ll let you read it for yourself.

as for the founders not being followers of Christ. If thay were not of that mind set why then is it that Christ is so much a part of there writting and reasoning?

I think if you have a good look you will find why you are under the popular and horribly wrong/misguided opinion that the U.S wasent founded on christian laws.

what are the facts of marraige in a Godless country?

It is for this reason that a man will depart from his parents and join to a wife. Would that be the right book?

I think what is missed in the thinking of the right ,with there being no personal God there can be no man made lawful reason to stop man from joining man. As we are ruled by man ,the law must be the same for everyone. The law must be blind .

In the current time the state recognises what God has done when He joins a man and a woman into one person. What is being asked of the state is that it recognise what man has joined . Is it the same? NO,but-and you know there was going to be a but- the law is the same.

On another note----the bill of rights ----If The rights are given by the creater, and there is no creater, WE must be the givers of rights .I say we make no new laws giving gays the right to be married in any way ,shape ,or form.

yes I spell poorly

Abbadon. well thought out and well put. But ,and you know there was going to be a but.lol. having a law for the right and another for the left cannot work. If it is only the wouldview of the right that is in the way of everyone being able to join in" marriage" .

would it not be much better to allow the right to "think" there thoughts , allow the left to "think" there thoughts about marriage under the same law ? If its only a matter of what is thought then no harm is done.

uldust from the great state of missery.lol

So what we are saying is that short term unions for any reason should be allowed,? I see alot of wagging the dog going on in the USA right now. I dont see it ending well .

what is marriage? What is the point in marriage? Who started it? why can we not have as many spouces as we wont? Is there more than one type of marriage? Please dont reply . My mind is made up on all of the above. If you change what marriage is its no longer a marriage, its a contract worth only what people are willing to give to it. call it what you will but dont tell me its a marriage if pro-creation has no part to play.

still in the very same place. You should move back its cheeper to live.lol

wish I had all the time back I spent running countrys in Harry. Doing well Snarf?