Verified:

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Apr 12th 2012, 1:59:35

i use this line to perfection

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Apr 6th 2012, 2:14:46

Originally posted by Marshal:
got any hot chicks?


galleri couldnt take our sexuality

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Apr 6th 2012, 2:12:51

very good cause, please lend a moment or two everyone!!

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Mar 23rd 2012, 6:11:47

this thread is fun and garbage-like

we have to attempt to catch all the land traders somehow :P

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Mar 16th 2012, 2:47:55

ZOMG cant wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Mar 8th 2012, 23:01:09

i was just there, trust me dont do it. kansas is hell in the USA

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Mar 2nd 2012, 0:21:41

i dont even understand how you can expect we will care about pacting you mid set, weve been kind enough to make an offer for you despite it really not being in our best interest. you make it seem like its a big deal that were (and you know its not just us, not sure why were being singled out so much) grabbing a small clan, as though that never happens on this server. not trying to be rude here, but this is a game. you dont have the capability of retalling the top 2/3rds of our members, why wouldnt we take your land. sad fact of the alliance server. i hope you are foolish enough not to take our offer that is on the table, so i can continue to get fat.

at least buy some warfare tech if youre gonna fluff so much...

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 28th 2012, 5:41:00

lolol

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 26th 2012, 17:43:55

Originally posted by BattleKJ:
Evo are good at weaseling out of things, we even have a Head called weasel. Thats all good, but our horrible attempts at being dirty little butt weasels seemed to have failed 2 sets ago when we had a pact broken on us and blindsided and last set when we war prepped with a clear plan to hitting LaF ended up being hit by SoF OOP, beating them down, signing peace deals with LaF, and then having that pact broken again and beaten down by LaF.



woohoo im famous!!!! also, most of what is being discussed here, 80% of EVO is oblivious to. KJ is not even in our tag this reset.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 23rd 2012, 3:24:21

come to EVO bobo!!! we bang the finest fluffes!!!

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 16th 2012, 2:35:52

the overlords dont like people who think for themselves

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 14th 2012, 3:08:22

Originally posted by hanlong:
EVERYONE IS #1!


i agree with hanlong on something. fact.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 14th 2012, 2:59:53

because what is he going to be able to actually change as that one crazy guy he's always been perceived to be? if you look at some of his historic videos, he has always represented a stark contrast to popular belief, despite his caving into it.

only now, since he has brought his ideas to the forefront with his strong grassroots campaign this year, are people taking his beliefs seriously enough. it still isn't going to be enough though.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 11th 2012, 22:46:56

Originally posted by anoniem:
i'd miss slagpit. he's my favourite earther, because he speaks truth.

he's like the people's champion, and i for one applaud him.


i have to agree with anon, ill second that notion, and i've even had internal struggles with slag before too.

at least when slag gets pissed about fluff, its in the name of the right thing to do. you dont see him breaking pacts with friends, or slinging dirt on AT at people who havent already been assholes.

Edited By: weasel on Feb 11th 2012, 22:50:27
See Original Post

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 10th 2012, 5:50:39

is this the offspring of cgiboney, i am so confused.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 9th 2012, 3:49:30

Originally posted by Oceana:
Originally posted by aponic:
How does limiting people to a single term prevent them from being 'bought'? It actually makes it easier. Remove contributions from anything but people and you will greatly increase the chances of good candidates.


I agree it should be all donations must originate by a Perso with-in the Districts, as that is who they are suppose to be representing. No a Corporation is not a person, People own a Corporation so let them use the money the took out of it as their money and use it by the same rules as everyone else. Want to buy the Congressman of a certain district then move your residence there.
The system needs to only except from those whose SS# are from your districts residence. If its not then the checks should just go in the general treasury as your determined Fine for trying to corrupt the system.


winning. okay now lets run for congress and propose this.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 9th 2012, 3:43:16

I think EVOs Prez and VP have spoken well enough to end this thread and our involvement in it.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 6th 2012, 4:06:16

Nice-- the same should happen here in the US, but no one even knows about this one because of all the hype SOPA/PIPA rightfully got.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 4th 2012, 19:10:50

w00t! thats awesome, welcome back!

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 4th 2012, 19:05:19

stay classy evo, avoid the urge to post sarcastic and bitter comments on this thread at all costs :P

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 4th 2012, 19:02:54

apply to EVO if you want to be with the best netters

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 3rd 2012, 0:01:56

Originally posted by qzjul:

If I understand your point correctly, you'd rather tax the fluff out of the poor and have the rich have basically no taxes?


i think you misinterpretted my beliefs signifigantly. i would like to see the poor paying 0% federal income tax.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 19:16:57

i understand the concept of marginal tax rates, but i can just never get behind such a tax rate hike. my political leaning is that we must do the opposite, and couple it with spending cuts on the other side of the balance sheet. 1 million dollars isnt even that much money anymore anyways. i hope to make that much someday, but if i was going to get taxed that high, id prolly try to find a country to work in that i wouldnt get taxed so highly. couple that with the dollar devaluation were seeing, the US would lose every last bit of competitiveness we have remaining.

not to mention its a moot point because it is unrealistic, because the people making the laws are the ones that would be paying more taxes, it would never pass.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 19:06:15

to my point of changing our reputation, i hear that loud and clear.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 19:04:14

candyman- i second anon here, EVOs doors are open to you. :)

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 18:53:39

Originally posted by Pang:
Originally posted by qzjul:
You didn't forsee us getting involved because we didn't "get involved"; we were blindsided during a netting set by LaF while we had a Unap with them; and then gangbanged by them with Rival this set, again while we had a Unap with them.


that's another tangent; but yes... I expected Evo to be able to net-it-out on the sidelines for the duration of the SoF/SoL/LaF/LCN wars (which stretch back to the start of EE and has SoF essentially switching sides). and I believe Evo could have continued to stay out if their members didn't like AT and LaF-bashing so much. We can argue the validity of that as a reason to go to war, but in the end if Evo wasn't fighting with LaF in public I don't think LaF would have hit Evo at all.

but then again, I haven't had visibility into LaF's planning for over a year so maybe things changed from when I was there.


qz is completely right, but there is validity to your point as well pang. i would like to see evo become a more positive influence on AT than in the past, and change our reputation a bit across the server. we are still just a bunch of treehuggers at heart.

lets be real about this here though. For a consistent number of resets we dominated ANW, and once we built our member base up around the 70's, we were taking TNW and Land too. We went from an annoyance to a threat by being larger. we will now go back to being simply an annoyance, because we've lost about half of our members from our peak a few sets ago. thats the bottom line with Evo's involvement. We wanted no part of a war with LaF, despite the banter on AT.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 18:38:07

no ones gonna mention Workoholics? i'd say that and Always Sunny are my two faves currently running.

i'll admit my guilty pleasure is 2 Broke Girls too. i wanna have a threesome with those two so bad :P

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 5:50:30

it doesnt need to be just based on gold though, you could include an entire index of metals as a part of the dollar formula, and it could be pegged for current monetary enviroments. its not like all of the sudden the dollar would just be worthless because the US begins increasing gold/silver/platinum/etc reserves. look at what china is doing right now with their gold reserves. theres an obvious reason why theyre buying so much of it, right now, and not 10 years ago. and its not so their kids can play with shiny objects. to say gold is not a form of currency is just foolish given how fragile the global picture is right now.

were not seeing stagflation right now, because newsflash, the free market system is totally rigged and reporting is artifcial, and has been for at least 10 years now, arguably much more. inflation is an imaginary number, indexed to wage increases, has nothing to do with food/gas/medical cost increases (at least the number they show you on tv). if we looked at that real inflation number, you would see a signifigant inflation %, easily more than 5%. we wont get to the level of germany as long as there is not sheer collapse, because there will always be demand for american services. now if the economy begins to gather momentum for say 2-3 quarters, thats when we could possibly see the hyper inflation rear its ugly head.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 5:35:18

mr snow, it would not so much matter how many people would no longer pay taxes, but what the actual dollar figure was in decreased tax revenue. i suspect the % of overall tax revenue that actually represents is rather low, though i have no proof to back that up, just a hunch.

and qz, in the wise words of will ferrell, i like you man, but you're crazy. 90% over 1m? you might as well just live in a pure communist society where everyone makes 1m, right?

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 2nd 2012, 5:27:19

this thread is a load of terd sandwiches.

EVO will be back to it's former glory, just wait and see. i think pang's comment about the veteran core couldn't be anymore true. far from dead.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 1st 2012, 3:01:19

Originally posted by Mr Snow:
No income tax below $50k? What a fluffing joke. Why would you ever want to do that? Don't you want a country where people feel they have a vested interest in seeing it prosper? Why would you want the vast majority of Americans to pay no income tax? That idea alone points out the very distinct possibility that the people who wrote that are fluffing insane.


Originally posted by Mr Snow:
That wouldn't work the way you want.

Rich people don't need to spend all their money. Poor people do. You'd effectively be giving poor people a higher tax rate, while rich people who save and don't spend all their money pay a lesser effective tax rate.



god damn, you make me wanna yell at you, then two seconds later i want to give you a high five. this is so conflicting. i agree with your second point completely, sales tax would not work, though it seems good on paper.

but to the first, would you rather earn 100k and bring home 90k, or earn 50k and bring home 50k?

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Feb 1st 2012, 2:54:13

so many points i want to argue here, but instead i will just agree with aponic and atryn mostly. i do want to also call grimm a moron too for his comment, (*yeah i would hate to have ~100% ROI*)

i do sincerely believe that if the US citizens will ever be able to overcome our current systemic malady in the next few decades, it will be born of a fusion party between the tea party and OWS, without the all whackos, plus lots of intelligent contributors with legitimate credibility.

we need one thing, to get money out of politics... somehow. a simpleton like myself doesnt have the answer as to how, but its the only way to save this country. it is the fundamental value that can be united behind in this country. combining forces, as opposed to the typical division of parties.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 31st 2012, 4:30:00

i refuse to be trolled by your unlogic.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 31st 2012, 2:53:19

i've seen that before, no shocker. okay, so a little fear mongery, but at least hes making a buck the true capitalistic way.

honestly, since he wrote that, hasn't he been right about the dollar and gold? hasn't he been right about the surveillance state?

we really are one "national emergency" away from marshall law, i dont see why that should seem shocking either.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 31st 2012, 1:12:31

weird blend of libertarian and liberal. i agree with about 2/3s of it.

love the no income tax below 50k though, that could fix the problem alone, imo.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 31st 2012, 0:49:51

another thing that must be considered is the source of that article. bloomberg.

i love when people take articles about economic policy seriously, as though they are definitely all true, when they are written by Keynesian, flamingly liberal sources who have no clue about economies, they just know what theyve been brainwashed for the past 100 years to think...

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 31st 2012, 0:47:15

so, as a committed paul-bot, who works in finance, and has a very solid grasp of global economies, the article is right... to a certain degree.

paul's economic policy would be sure to stagnate our economy even more, perhaps spur a depression. but would you rather deal with that now or later? it is inevitably coming at some point, whether we prop up the economy now with spending or not. all the current economic policy does is kick the can down the road for a few years. look at what is happening in Greece/Italy and the EZ right now, that is the result of over spending more than your economy can support. The US is only a few years behind europe in this regard. and its not like all this spending is actually getting us out of the recession anyways.

so why wouldnt you just fix it now? as a devout paul supporter, i believe his economic policy will crash the global economy, but sadly, it's what we need to come out a better nation and world. the phoenix will rise from the ashes, and RP's economic policy WILL be the model for gov't fiscal spending after we have our modern day depression. We will not have another choice in the matter...

but here we are, a country on the verge of economic collapse, continuing policy that has FAILED.

You may call Dr. Paul nuts and crazy all you want, we've heard it all. However, insanity by definition is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. current policy is insanity, not Ron Paul.

and seriously archaic, Rand Paul a white supremacist?? Seriously?? go crawl back under the rock you popped out from under. or go vote for some RINO, either will produce the same result...

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 30th 2012, 13:42:55

i can be reached by email or forum message

weasel:

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 26th 2012, 4:35:00

omg so long cant read, but i bet i agree 100%

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 22nd 2012, 19:20:15

awww yeah bonus post, me lubs you hanlong

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 15th 2012, 20:06:10

i hate tim tebow. he got what he deserved, a big piece of go home pie served from my man, the only QB god actually cares about, tom terrific.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 11th 2012, 4:31:41

spam spam spam ron paul spam spam spam

:)

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 11th 2012, 4:30:18

Originally posted by Autocorrect:
Actually that's funny because we watch and laugh at how many countries Evo will drop, leadership even takes a poll on how many they will drop every set.


we make sure we have dropped our inactive members at least 2 weeks before the end of the reset, simple difference.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 8th 2012, 20:43:59

come back to us!

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 8th 2012, 20:18:19

another masterful LaF AT spin-job at work...

nice PS on me too, fluffing amateurs

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 7th 2012, 19:11:11

Originally posted by KingKaosKnows:
O.O
Can't we get Ron Paul as a president and Romney as its VP? Seems like the best combination out of all of them, and Obama isn't working.


that doesnt make sense that romney would be his VP, they represent totally different ideologies. though it would be a good idea if they want to defeat obummer. i think the best idea for ron at this point is to leak who his VP will be if elected, and i hope his son is the choice.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 7th 2012, 19:05:01

*thread lasts so long, US accumulates another 1T in debt*

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 6th 2012, 4:19:38

Originally posted by BobbyATA:
Romney, Santorum, Gingrich and Huntsman are the only four with a shot still.


100 bucks says ron paul gets 10x more votes than huntsman overall.

EVO Internal Affairs Department

weasel Game profile

Member
101

Jan 6th 2012, 4:13:46

Originally posted by Pontius Pirate:
love how quickly this thread degenerated to being about a complete non-issue


so true, i tried to marginalize the abortion issue. because if were talking ron paul, that should be an after thought to the economy.

EVO Internal Affairs Department