Originally
posted by
Makinso:
Let's put it in perspective and move away from metaphores, because that seems to allow people to not actually react to the factual situation but only react to the metaphor?
Interesting way to build a case, first you say move away from metaphores, then you go straight back to a far-fetched metaphore, as if we should forget that it's your dreamt up scenario that has nothing to do with what we were actually talking about.
Originally
posted by
Makinso:
Is LaFs now saying that if they are @ war and a random untagged/spamtag country makes harmful attacks into your war. You will not (which has been normal policy for years) ask police to take care of the untagged country and support/promote their actions? And in the same length if a country suicides you and you try to kill it for it, does it justify the suicider hurting more of your netters in a netting set? Because by your proposed rhetoric or concept it should. In that case we should justfiy all suiciders vs laf as of this point?
A country we are hitting will have to be considered free to retaliate should it wish it. LaFs policy has always been that if we are the aggressor on an untagged and if that untagged hits back ONLY on the country that hit it(assuming the retals are fair and not like 40 ABs for a landgrab), we will not spend a single turn helping our member because that member is pulling the rest of us down and should improve his game. It's written in our landgrab policy and has been as long as I been here. The Aggressor is never free from retaliation.
Whatever else you are talking about is just nonsense and has nothing to do with what we are talking about here.
PDM might have been right to hit Karnage, but Karnage certainly has the right to proportionatly retaliate anyone who hits him, as does everyone.
Originally
posted by
Makinso:
Taking it another step further if another war tag let's say elders helps LaF kill a suicider in a netting set. And the suicider then suicides on elders + LaF 2 - 3 sets in a row. Does it justify that? If so let me know.
You have a problem with the term aggressor:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/aggressor
Anything else you said has no relevance to this case, this thread or anything else for that matter. Do better.
Originally
posted by
Makinso:
And what about LaF killing potential suiciders in untags pre-emptivly? We've seen you do it. Does this pre-emptive action justify that suiciders suicide you pre-emptivly?
This has never been done without very good reason, such as pacts to suiciders that already hit us, ops prior, known suiciders country names or finding them in the leaderboards to belong to players who suicided us the set before.
When we spend netting turns of our best and most active netters you better believe it is for a damned good reason.
One mistake comes to mind in the past 2.5 years that I have been here, ONE, and that was not any of our heads leading. And I take great care at reminding the Syko that lead this Kill run that he made a mistake every now and again. :)
