See title. Lazy thoughts below, but I'm sure other people have given it a lot more consideration. Galleri - anything notable from your 125 page leisure reading?

Benefits - you don't have to kick people out of your group if they leave for real life or other breaks and then want to come back.

Cons - a handful of large groups leads to stale server dynamics.

I think I'd lean towards having unique teams capping at 5 players, but it's not the status quo, so it would take some momentum and support to change what has long been done.

What happens in Team Server stays in Team Server....

Nice.

I chuckled.

Yeah....players seemed to have liked each other way back then. Some of you made better jokes. 🤣

Ok though.... On topic:
Seemed everyone followed the general 5 man team up to a point.
But I am sure the game population at this point is partly a cause now.

In conclusion.... The answer KoH gave makes the most sense.

Teams will alway work together as the only people here are mainly long tenured team players who have played as a group for years.

It doesn't really matter...I mean the alternative is to give the B team a new name - but they are still the same players with the same allegiances.

No.

It certainly could be argued that it delegitimizes who is really the most skilled team and instead has the highest numbers. I could make 100 teams with total idiots and have them all launch a fee missiles and how does a 5 man team answer that?

Having said that I agree that loyalties will be had regardless amongst old friends. So both? My answer is yes and no

Nobody has to participate in the infinite circle jerk.

Be a lot more legit if people got in groups of 5 and stuck to them, alone. Even rng would be better than the typical trash we see here.

Get in groups of 5 and remain anonymous otherwise. Tag with people you normally might not. Infinitely more interesting