willful blindness pisses me off...

Gains "Wish people were up to it would gladly ab fs you retards every set."

Dissi "/me waits for Laf leaders to tell Gains to stfu before netting becomes a thing of the permanent past."

Ivan "doesnt mean that its ok to threaten people that they will never net again blah blah blah"

So Ivan. Its ok to threaten us, and thats not bullying because why? Because they suck too bad to be taken seriously or what?

for what it's worth gains inherently qualified that as a non threat by saying he "wish people were up for it", confirming that people were not up for it. i'm the leader of laf and i personally would like to net again sometime soon and see if gerdler is as good as he says he is. that aspect is not a secret. we've warred 3 sets in a row and that's a while when leadership is actively seeking to resolve issues.

.and no gains isn't going to get reprimanded because he's a boss old player and a head too ... and he has his rights to his own opinions (many probably built on the constant threats that his alliance won't net anymore ... so just seems like fair trash talking on both sides to me)

so for either side, i don't think member trash talk is a valid reason for fighting moving forward. the official laf stance is not one of aggression and i still think both sides' members should be free to talk as they wish without it dictating opposing alliance policy.

oh correction, gains *is* going to get reprimanded for saying "retard"

This thread just lost an unfathomable amount of merit.

makes sense

"when leadership is actively seeking to resolve issues."

please explain that to me... my inbox is empty.

you trolling or being serious?

if you're being serious - each of the last 3 sets both tob and myself have reached out to multiple elders head contacts and asked for a pact and were not even responded to most times. i'm not complaining ... but you asked and it's all documented. i've even mentioned it and stated it on AT as laf's formal statement so i'm assuming you are mostly just trolling :)

but ya, right now i'm having a very cordial conversation with link and have had the same with derrick, and i'm glad to be chatting with both of them this set. as for the comment about laf leadership trying to device some plan to net ... again, it's not some mystery or secret plan ... we are netters and would love to net again, and as such, each set we offer everyone pacts.

and with that said, some laf members (2 or 3 out of 35?) can still trash elders members and elders members can still trash laf members (fairly certainly it's a much higher % of elders members consistently trashing laf on AT :p) ... its kind of what AT is for. but that doesn't change my positioning or our formal position which is representative of the vast % of our membership who want to net.

Gains comments as a "boss old player" hurt my feelings and Ive placed a formal complaint to Dissidents inbox asking for LaF v Elders next set to ease my snowflake hurt feelings. Good day, Mr. Boro

like i said, we're glad to oblige, we'd prefer peace but if you want to go 1 v 1 that works too

Elders don't do 1 vs 1

Incorrect

maps

I love how its somehow a huge crime to go into a war youre almost guaranteed to win and people complain... even when laf did the same damned thing to us last set.

And the trash talk about "elders doesnt 1v1" and "elders is just sol lapdog" and "derricks vagina smells of rotting kimchee".. 2 of those 3 are blatant lies. Yall know that right? I mean that fluff is so stinky

lol

LOL

Derrick doesnt have a vagina, he tucks and hides it and then at the last second *SURPRISE!!*

bonus

TTT

boneass