Change is LaF Retaliation Policy - Earth Empires Forum

TheORKINMan

Member
1305

Jun 24th 2010, 16:26:15

ZIP: That's fine as long as alliances that do stuff like this expect the cut throat attitude to be reciprocated and don't complain to Pang when it is.

Smarter than your average bear.

@Nuk

usually it's the other alliance's FAs that avoids our FAs.

Honestly, I have enough trust in our FR department to do what's right for each situation.

Besides, this game could use a bit more mix up and create fun.

Forgotten
ICQ 43083642
MSN

NukEvil

Member
4328

Jun 24th 2010, 17:13:58

Yeah, I was just using LaF as an example, being they're the ones doing the new policy and all.

I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

Mr Midnight

Member
132

Jun 24th 2010, 17:32:25

I would think that if LaF grabs another tag, they would have to submit to that other tags retal policy and not dictate their own.

H4xOr WaNgEr

Forum Moderator
1974

Jun 24th 2010, 18:51:53

If that were the case than nobody would ever be fighting over land:land or whatever else alliances fight over.

martian

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
7841

Jun 24th 2010, 19:05:44

I think all clans should impose a 1:kill retal policy on laf:P

++evil martian:P

you are all special in the eyes of fluff
(|(|
( ._.) -----)-->
(_(' )(' )

RUN IT IS A KILLER BUNNY!!!

Detmer

Member
4283

Jun 24th 2010, 19:07:04

I could see Helmet doing that.

Drow

Member
1990

Jun 24th 2010, 22:34:02

does sound amusing though :P
I also see far too much potential for abuse in this, but we will see.

Paradigm President of failed speeling

"EE's DILF" - Coalie