Originally
posted by
Jiman:
Eh, I think saying Laf is a bully is not an appropriate analogy. Please dont misunderstand me, I am VERY happy SOL is involved in a war. There were better paths (like us warring Sof) but w/e War is war.
My issue is that Laf came to me as well as other alliances saying they want to see SOL make better choices. As soon as we start doing that, laf decided (on multiple occasions) to take advantage of a non aggressive approach.
The question is, what now? Should SOL sit back and let Laf attempt to take advantage of SOL? Or plan to defend themselves from Laf being the agressor?
So Ya, bring it Laf. If this is the path you want to make for yourselves, so be it. :-)
Umm those logs are anything but non aggresive jiman sorry bud that makes no sense..
to me it sounds like the sequence of events went like this
1. laf beats sol in a war
2. sol and laf sign a 3 set pact
3. maki plots laf's demise and thinks hes smarter then my dog hanlong
4. maki/sol have a oh f*ck oh f*ck moment this set when they realize they arent going to be able to smash laf but the opposite is going to happen
5. maki/sol try to pact out to save their asses
6. laf does to sol what sol wanted to (and would have if they had the chance) do to laf.