Originally
posted by
Drow:
hmm did I see NA claiming some sort of morality?
the SAME NA (who referring to NukEvils version of point #3 here) who in the set where their high level leader was caught involved in a cheating ring on another server turned round and blatantly switched between 3 different retal policies on PDM to try and refuse legitimate retals? (Oh and I mean genuinely legitimate here, 1:1 grabs for them grabbing us)
funny story, really.
it IS sad to see you dragged into war though, I was happy grazing along grabbing random countries, and now my pool of lg targets has dropped
he was a member, not a leader in NA
our retal policy was 1:1 ESC, and in L:L cases, DH ends allowed retals, and retals messages being required to be sent. you guys broke your own policy that set by continuing to hit after DH on a L:L and by sending attacks without messages and claiming they were retals. and by RoR'ing our retals on your attacks that you claimed were retals (but weren't since there were no retal messagse). i was taught those polices, by paradigm, before i founded NA, and i used those policies in NA. NA has had the same retal policies since i founded NA in oct 2005. (aside from 2 sets. 1: when we tested country:country retals a year ago, which is not the set you refer to, and 2: when we tested a 4:1 retal policy) I bet no one remembers the latter, it only lasted about 6 or 7 days.
drow i like you man, but the facts are the facts
and yea its ridiculous for us to be dragged into something we wanted no part of. something we made clear to every clan leader that talked to me or any of my FA's. we tend to be pretty straightforward. i'd prefer only warring over ingame issues honestly. i don't recall us landgrabbing or doing anything to sof, and they still haven't posted a war dec as to why this is happening.
this LAF situation is interesting, not sure what to make of it yet, havent been able to catch up with my heads. NA's never done an FS without my approval before that I can recall :P i was away for the weekend though. that clause they made us sign in the pact was rather suspect though. their actions did void the pact, so we in no way broke pact, so all y'all get that out of your heads.
