Originally
posted by
DerrickICN:
Yeah. Even at the beginning of the set i wasnt buying that imps upper echelon believed they only had 80 countries despite their members seeming to think so.
I think they knew with hawk, at least one of his pet rabbits plus at least two untagged/solo tagged strings were on their side. While the members may've thought it was 80 i think prime knew for sure it was closer to 150-170. Theres a couple late arrivals (vamps playing the role of hawks wife, sin playing the role of hawks sexy nurse and the guy in imp with the low 3000s playing the role of primes last prostitute that turned out to be a man) that they weren't necessarily banking on. Which put numbers around 250 to 170ish. If you scale that down it's like 19 vs 12. Hardly the gangbang that I've heard impers call it but whatever.
I know if elders and sof at 15 this set in 1a get challanged by a tag 25-35% larger than us I'm probably going to just laugh at them before we beat them without doing any sort of nonsense. And if we lose we'll make it an adventure and it will be fun and memorable. This is neither of those things. I guess I just have more faith in ironx and hawk's abilities than do their ffa leadership.
Well, CC had almost 100 (thought I saw 96) members before it disbanded, KARMA 54, LoC almost 150.... it wouldn't be asking IMP to fight a war vs a clan 25-35% bigger... it'd be like asking Elders this set to take on both LaF and SoL straight up. So a 4:1 number advantage. That'd be even more boring. The way IMP did it actually gave you ingredients for a fun war, the problem was that CC was inactive and LoC lacks an ability to dig deep. If either CC was active, or LoC upped their game, this war would still be raging. Blame them. Lol
And if you want a fun war next set let's arrange something when I'm back.
If you give a man some fire, he'll be warm for awhile. If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.