Originally
posted by
mrford:
Actually, it's exactly the same, if not more valid.
You are interperting a photo of political targets to be a death list. A pretty harsh and large leap in logic.
"my congress woman is dead to me" is a much harsher action IMO and has very little room for interpertation.
If you can interpert a simple political tool as a death list, then by that logic you can absoluetly not ignore the "she is dead to me" statment.
I'm sure even you can follow that line of logic.
Well I say it is less valid as that term, to my knowledge, does not encourage any action. It is a statement of position. However I see that I have been operating on a premise that I thought I had posted here, but in review had not. So I apologize for that. As I posted on another forum, it is the repeated violent rhetoric, not just the single isolated image, that is why her messages are so inappropriate.
Again, I apologize for not being clear on this. I can see why this would sound ludicrous as an indictment against one single item.