Verified:

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 0:26:12

05/10/2011 00:24:01 GT True SOLdier NLS (#6) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:23:51 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:23:41 GT SOuL Fighter (#625) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:23:38 GT SOuL Fighter (#625) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:23:16 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:23:10 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:53 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:52 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:51 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:33 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) EM Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:23 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:22 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:04 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:03 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:03 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:02 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:22:00 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:28 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:28 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:28 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:25 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:21 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:07 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:06 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:21:04 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:58 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:56 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:56 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:55 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:53 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:49 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:48 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:47 GT Jiman (#71) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:47 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:33 GT Jiman (#71) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:18 GT Bugger off Mate (#48) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:16 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:14 GT Jiman (#71) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:08 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:00 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:20:00 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:59 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:59 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:58 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:57 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:53 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:16 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:15 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:14 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:12 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:12 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:11 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:09 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:07 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:19:02 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:54 GT Dixie Chicken (#521) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:47 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:46 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:44 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:37 GT Little Butt Nugget (#93) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:18:18 GT Dark Realm SOL (#112) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
05/10/2011 00:17:53 GT True SOLdier NLS (#6) (SOLdiers) Ravi (#342) (LCNostra) GS Defended
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

TY Game profile

Member
373

May 10th 2011, 0:34:12

and its dead
There's a great power in words, if you don't hitch too many of them together.
Josh Billings


archaic Game profile

Member
7012

May 10th 2011, 0:34:25

Awesome!

Watching you guys lemming from the lead has made the war totally worth it.
Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

LittleItaly Game profile

Game Moderator
Alliance, FFA, & Cooperation
2194

May 10th 2011, 1:07:00

LOL @ LOLing
LittleItaly
SOL Vet
-Discord: LittleItaly#2905
-IRC: irc.scourge.se #sol
-Apply today @ http://sol.ghqnet.com for Alliance

Trixx Game profile

Member
315

May 10th 2011, 1:07:48

LOL @ LOLing @ LOLing
-=Trixx=-
Head of AT Spammage

ICQ: 138314471

LittleItaly Game profile

Game Moderator
Alliance, FFA, & Cooperation
2194

May 10th 2011, 1:09:29

LOL @ LOLing @ LOLing @ COPYING
LittleItaly
SOL Vet
-Discord: LittleItaly#2905
-IRC: irc.scourge.se #sol
-Apply today @ http://sol.ghqnet.com for Alliance

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 1:11:05

alliance server nubs are entertaining


lemming is an extremely valid tactic and is used very often on the FFA server. a lemming attack actually destroys more military than a successful attack if you send the right ratios.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Klown Game profile

Member
967

May 10th 2011, 1:12:13

LOL@Imag losing with a 40 country advantage.

Trixx Game profile

Member
315

May 10th 2011, 1:14:05

LOL @ ummmm, I dunno, @ something
-=Trixx=-
Head of AT Spammage

ICQ: 138314471

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 1:16:15

Originally posted by mrford:
alliance server nubs are entertaining


lemming is an extremely valid tactic and is used very often on the FFA server. a lemming attack actually destroys more military than a successful attack if you send the right ratios.


Yes, when you don't have breakers.

But when you're SOL and still have 30 originals, and 15 of those who are high troops it's still fluffing funny to see this tactic from them.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

LittleItaly Game profile

Game Moderator
Alliance, FFA, & Cooperation
2194

May 10th 2011, 1:17:38

Its ok everyone, Soviet can be blinded by anger and doesnt need to learn about efficiency.
LittleItaly
SOL Vet
-Discord: LittleItaly#2905
-IRC: irc.scourge.se #sol
-Apply today @ http://sol.ghqnet.com for Alliance

Klown Game profile

Member
967

May 10th 2011, 1:21:09

You are aware of the break on the country, correct?

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 1:23:36

You saying you were too incompetent to break him?
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

Klown Game profile

Member
967

May 10th 2011, 1:24:59

iMag has zero right to criticize the war performance of any other clan. Win a war and we'll talk.

TNTroXxor Game profile

Member
1295

May 10th 2011, 1:26:22

Originally posted by Soviet:
Originally posted by mrford:
alliance server nubs are entertaining


lemming is an extremely valid tactic and is used very often on the FFA server. a lemming attack actually destroys more military than a successful attack if you send the right ratios.


Yes, when you don't have breakers.

But when you're SOL and still have 30 originals, and 15 of those who are high troops it's still fluffing funny to see this tactic from them.


SOL likes to handicap their foe.
Originally posted by JJ23:
i havent been deleted since last set

Goofy Game profile

Member
415

May 10th 2011, 1:32:07

Lemming is never more efficient than straight breaking, especially when you already have the bigger countries.

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 1:48:57

false.

if you cant break easily at 1/3 and have low oil.....lemming is execelent
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Pontius Pirate

Member
EE Patron
1907

May 10th 2011, 1:57:43

Originally posted by iScode:
Originally posted by Klown:
iMag has zero right to criticize the war performance of any other clan. Win a war and we'll talk.


Klown, I am not gonna argue with you on the valadity of this thread, I dont agree with it, lemming is a viable and great tactic to use if required.

However please stop saying we have never won a war as I have shown you on many previous occasions we have won plenty of wars, we have even caused more than one alliance to disband. Your argument there is completely invalid, i know your trolling, i like trolling to, this answer is infact a troll for you to respond ;).
I think he means a real war.
Originally posted by Cerberus:

This guy is destroying the U.S. Dollars position as the preferred exchange for international trade. The Chinese Ruan is going to replace it soon, then the U.S. will not have control of the IMF

LittleItaly Game profile

Game Moderator
Alliance, FFA, & Cooperation
2194

May 10th 2011, 2:03:54

Everybody, stop trying to teach IFAG how to war, that would be counter productive and dumb all of us down to there stupidity. If they would like there breakers to buy 20m+ troops and oil to go with it to break during there wars, then let them do it ;)
LittleItaly
SOL Vet
-Discord: LittleItaly#2905
-IRC: irc.scourge.se #sol
-Apply today @ http://sol.ghqnet.com for Alliance

Junky Game profile

Member
1815

May 10th 2011, 2:33:00

a kill is a kill, doesn't matter how its done... its the result that matters... the fact that we Lemminged you and still got the kill cause he was too slow to stop the kill run lemming and all doesn't help his cause...

take the beating and thank us. for giving you another.
I Maybe Crazy... But atleast I'm crazy.

Junky Game profile

Member
1815

May 10th 2011, 2:43:15

I still gotta kill, key and destroy your country Scode :-P
I Maybe Crazy... But atleast I'm crazy.

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 3:19:16

Originally posted by Klown:
iMag has zero right to criticize the war performance of any other clan. Win a war and we'll talk.

I'm pretty sure we smashed NA last set even after SOL came in. All they had were 2 really active originals that escaped our repeated attempts to kill them.

Is that recent enough for you?

Oh but you're going to say "WAH THEY WERE NETTING!!". No, we told NA we'd hit them and we did. No excuses.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

May 10th 2011, 3:20:53

I guess mentioning that the last and biggest targets we toke down did not contribute a thing to the war effort (being INC/LCN/imag side), so it would of had time to grow and stock. Which in itself is sad, I would of hoped that every country on the other side would put 100% effort into the war like ( breaking targets in this case).

What, 7.5mil troops and it didnt break any targets? Maybe we should laugh at the war tactics used by imag/icn/lcn.


If I was Imag, I would be annoyed that those I was defending didn't take the war seriously as they themselves did.

Edited By: Jiman on May 10th 2011, 3:41:50
See Original Post

xman Game profile

Member
58

May 10th 2011, 3:29:42

people also forgetting the market was sold out, so even if sol wanted to buy up fully there was nothing to buy. I'd rather lemming and kill it over waiting for god knows how long to break it straight

aponic Game profile

Member
1879

May 10th 2011, 3:37:59

Lemmings cause double losses. In reality 10 lemmings at the start of every kill run saves a lot of oil, jets or troops, and overall expense of carrying the excess military to break at 1/3.
SOF
Cerevisi

Dragun Game profile

Member
38

May 10th 2011, 3:38:40

xman i was just gonna say that, with a zero market, perfect time to lemming too, go ahead and buy off the private market, wont last that long

dead regardless

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 3:40:37

Originally posted by aponic:
Lemmings cause double losses. In reality 10 lemmings at the start of every kill run saves a lot of oil, jets or troops, and overall expense of carrying the excess military to break at 1/3.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Trixx Game profile

Member
315

May 10th 2011, 3:42:25

Hush yourself Dragun :)

and I agree with the people here that state that Lemmings are a legit strategy...they are, so deal with it.
-=Trixx=-
Head of AT Spammage

ICQ: 138314471

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 3:51:30

Originally posted by aponic:
Lemmings cause double losses. In reality 10 lemmings at the start of every kill run saves a lot of oil, jets or troops, and overall expense of carrying the excess military to break at 1/3.


So what about 62?
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 3:52:32

that depends on the target, break, and send amounts

imag really does suck dont they?
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 4:22:18

mrford you talk like you'd be useful in any war, let alone leading one.

Run along now, your mother needs the trash taken out.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

Junky Game profile

Member
1815

May 10th 2011, 4:31:49

I acatually quite enjoy Warring with MrFord, he's good at breaking things.
I Maybe Crazy... But atleast I'm crazy.

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 5:32:01

Originally posted by iScode:
mrford

dont talk about people sucking when you obviously suck many things of Llaar's just to keep your position in NA, well that or "i didnt know their were multies I swear"

LMFAO that would be a great Tui billboard. (dont worry that will go over your head..)


im not in NA, havnt been for quite some time.

try again though little troll. you are getting better
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

mrford Game profile

Member
21,358

May 10th 2011, 5:33:22

Originally posted by Soviet:
mrford you talk like you'd be useful in any war, let alone leading one.

Run along now, your mother needs the trash taken out.


i could run a war better than you in my sleep.

FFA or alliance. ask any CC member and they will confirm this statment. Run an 8 HOUR FS that kills 100 countries in the first 5, and then come talk to be fluff.

lol
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

galleri Game profile

Game Moderator
Primary, Express, Tourney, & FFA
14,057

May 10th 2011, 5:43:23

I EAT YOU IN MY SLEEP!


https://gyazo.com/...b3bb28dddf908cdbcfd162513

Kahuna: Ya you just wrote the fkn equation, not helping me at all. Lol n I hated algebra.

dagga Game profile

Member
1559

May 10th 2011, 6:07:39

At least Soviet is making himself look like a moron here, thats funny. Lemming was the absolute right call on a dict with no stock and stupid high troops.

If it was possible for imagnum to appear any stupider, they have achieved it here. I think they really thought they might win a real war this set. Oh well.

Edited By: dagga on May 10th 2011, 6:11:17
See Original Post
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22

Junky Game profile

Member
1815

May 10th 2011, 6:15:29

Originally posted by dagga:
At least Soviet is making himself look like a moron here, thats funny. Lemming was the absolute right call on a dict with no stock and stupid high troops.

If it was possible for imagnum to appear any stupider, they have achieved it here. I think they really thought they might win a real war this set. Oh well.


give them 2 days, they'll be calling victory shortly :-P
I Maybe Crazy... But atleast I'm crazy.

dagga Game profile

Member
1559

May 10th 2011, 6:17:14

Oh hang, on.. They win because their best 5 members have a better HPM than ALL OF SOL COMBINED RAWR!

aha. Gotta love the imaginary numbnuts.
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22

Devestation Game profile

Member
812

May 10th 2011, 6:53:54

I await the grumpy post from Ravi?

Akula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
4107

May 10th 2011, 7:53:20

it works, it dies, the rest - moot point
=============================
"Astra inclinant, sed non obligant"

SOL http://sol.ghqnet.com/
=============================

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 9:30:19

Originally posted by mrford:
Originally posted by Soviet:
mrford you talk like you'd be useful in any war, let alone leading one.

Run along now, your mother needs the trash taken out.


i could run a war better than you in my sleep.

FFA or alliance. ask any CC member and they will confirm this statment. Run an 8 HOUR FS that kills 100 countries in the first 5, and then come talk to be fluff.

lol

Sounds about right if you have 350-400 countries, so big whoop.

And it's funny how SOL is trying to change the very point of this thread of THEM HAVING TO LEMMING when they have had the breaking power of this war since Day 1. Do you see anywhere that I am arguing the validity of lemming? No, because that's stupid. iMag uses lemming in just about every war we fight, eventually. And it's also funny that no one on their side seems to know about losing extra readiness from failed attacks. Hah.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

Sifos Game profile

Member
1419

May 10th 2011, 10:17:25

Originally posted by Soviet:
Hah.


+1
Imaginary Numbers
If you're important enough to contact me, you will know how to contact me.
Self appointed emperor of the Order of Bunnies.
The only way to be certain your allies will not betray you is to kill them all!

swampy Game profile

Member
340

May 10th 2011, 11:01:39

DEAD DEAD DEAD DEAD LA LA LA LA

p.s My country is bored and needs to be hit! Bah ya all too weak/chicken to hit our originals anyway :)

Wu Game profile

Member
246

May 10th 2011, 12:38:10

Wow, Imag seems to be declaring Moral Victory!

Sorry to burst your bubble but all moral victories R belong 2 SOL. :P

ClayQ Game profile

Member
215

May 10th 2011, 14:05:11

Originally posted by Soviet:
...
And it's funny how SOL is trying to change the very point of this thread of THEM HAVING TO LEMMING when they have had the breaking power of this war since Day 1. Do you see anywhere that I am arguing the validity of lemming? No, because that's stupid. iMag uses lemming in just about every war we fight, eventually. And it's also funny that no one on their side seems to know about losing extra readiness from failed attacks. Hah.


If the point of this thread is about how SoL HAD to lemming, then you should go tell the original poster to fix the topic of thier thread. Because you've said it yourself right there that SoL has had the breaking power since day 1, meaning sol didn't HAVE to lemming, they CHOSE to lemming, because it was the better strategy. However the alternative is that you're wrong when you say that SoL has had the breaking power since day one, and in that case the original poster would be correct in making this thread.

However since you are the original poster, I'm going to go with you're wrong on BOTH points because you've essentially contradicted yourself, and shown how little you really understand.

aponic Game profile

Member
1879

May 10th 2011, 14:31:56

Soviet: You do not lose extra readiness on failed attacks as long as you send 30%.

Let us pretend I am the SOL breaker and I have 5 million troops at 150% weapons for 7.5 million. The break on the LCN country is 4 million raw.

I can easily speed hit at 2 million raw causing the same losses as breaking at 4 million raw.

I quickly spam 12 hits, breaking the last one. The break is now 2 million raw. I wasted 1-2 seconds additional time on the kill run and spent enough oil to supply 24 million barrels. This is a savings of nearly half the oil compared to me straight breaking. I also saved all my cash by not buying up and I further lowered my expenses by dropping my raw GS break (since there are very few breakers or no breakers left on the imag/LCN/ICN side).

The cost was 12 extra hits at 500 troops raw and the aforementioned 1-2 seconds for my lemmings.
SOF
Cerevisi

aponic Game profile

Member
1879

May 10th 2011, 14:36:09

Also, Ford can runs a good warchat. Comparing the leading of an experienced group of war oriented players vs a group of casual netters makes a big difference. Also, as Ford stated, he has run multiple FFA wars at this point which are the to the 6x magnitude of wars on Alliance.

This could help clarify your conception problem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/...amental_Attribution_Error
SOF
Cerevisi

Akula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
4107

May 10th 2011, 19:25:38

Originally posted by aponic:
Also, Ford can runs a good warchat .... as Ford stated, he has run multiple FFA wars at this point which are the to the 6x magnitude of wars on Alliance.


that, i will vouch for personally
=============================
"Astra inclinant, sed non obligant"

SOL http://sol.ghqnet.com/
=============================

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 19:47:10

Originally posted by aponic:
Soviet: You do not lose extra readiness on failed attacks as long as you send 30%.

Let us pretend I am the SOL breaker and I have 5 million troops at 150% weapons for 7.5 million. The break on the LCN country is 4 million raw.

I can easily speed hit at 2 million raw causing the same losses as breaking at 4 million raw.

I quickly spam 12 hits, breaking the last one. The break is now 2 million raw. I wasted 1-2 seconds additional time on the kill run and spent enough oil to supply 24 million barrels. This is a savings of nearly half the oil compared to me straight breaking. I also saved all my cash by not buying up and I further lowered my expenses by dropping my raw GS break (since there are very few breakers or no breakers left on the imag/LCN/ICN side).

The cost was 12 extra hits at 500 troops raw and the aforementioned 1-2 seconds for my lemmings.

I suggest you go retest, then come back here and say you were wrong.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org

Soviet Game profile

Member
991

May 10th 2011, 19:48:24

Or, alternatively you could completely disregard my advice and keep up the SOL spin you're putting in this thread, because you don't represent SOF in any important way or anything.
Imaginary Numbers
http://www.letskillstuff.org