Sep 12th 2011, 17:39:24
Originally posted by Rockman:
Doubling the time it takes to destock on very large sizes will not make it not worth it to grow to 40k+ acres, it will just force those who grow to 40k+ acres to stop growing a couple days earlier, and it will rightfully weaken a destocking strategy that I know from personal experience is way too powerful.
Taking away the building costs bonus will likely not affect bottomfeeders who grow to 40k acres, it will mainly affect those who expect to landtrade at past 40k. I believe that most of those who get to 40k acres without landtrading do not go for the building costs bonus right now, is that correct?
Taking away the building costs bonus will likely not affect bottomfeeders who grow to 40k acres, it will mainly affect those who expect to landtrade at past 40k. I believe that most of those who get to 40k acres without landtrading do not go for the building costs bonus right now, is that correct?
again i ask you. what is the problem about growing past 40k?
and why do we want cashers/farmers to do not as well as 30k demo techers? techers are already stronger, and you want to nerf casher/farmer? wtf?
and a casher would stock at 40k if food wasn't so high (usually around 40k food is at its peak). you grab on out of necessity to stock cheaper food later and not because only you can destock quickly. there's no way a 40k casher stocking at food peak prices will even come remotely close to a techer, even without 3k tech prices.
like i said it's literally the dumbest idea i ever heard. you are taking something that's already slightly imbalanced (techers vs casher/farmer in terms of getting t10), and tipping it even further.
and again i still haven't seen a valid argument why we need to encourge less fat countries.
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia
Don of La Famiglia