Verified:

crest23 Game profile

Member
4666

Apr 18th 2013, 20:06:58

Originally posted by Magellaan:
Originally posted by The Cloaked:
<ee> PS FortySix and Two (#125) --> Narcissistic (#175) -- 7776A/11484A

attacks like that are strictly sabotage. There is nothing for the attacker to gain and it'll cost 5m+ NW to rebuild the acres the attacker will lose on the retal.


Rebuild costs are about $250-300 million, not that bad I think and the cost of jets and oil were less than if I had to bottomfeed those 5k acres. And targets are getting scarce leading to me to bottomfeed targets that can potentially retal like one already did. I know that mathematically or cost-wise it makes more sense to bottomfeed but the lack of targets made me try out this topfeeding thing.
Am I a total fluffhead for topfeeding someone who's having such an amazing set? Well.. yes, I won't deny that. But it wasn't done to sabotage, it was done to benefit myself.


Oh yes, I can now see the wisdom in your words. That really benefited you. Every set the same thing, people never learn. Didn't think through all the consequences, didja?

Edited By: crest23 on Apr 18th 2013, 20:30:23
Back To Thread
See Original Post
See Subsequent Edit
The Nigerian Nightmare.