This is a challenge RD. You obviously want to fight. So let's fight.

Pick your best 5, and see if you can't fight like the team server was meant to be played. 1 team vs. 1 team.

I bet your best five couldn't tackle us without outside help next set.

Or is that too scary for you?

I don't like having to waste my time moderating the forums, so knock it off Hellz X.

na, we're netgaining next set. So that would be inconvenient and it would be inappropriate for you to attack someone who's not planning on it at the same time.


oh wait! that's what WARLORDe would say ;)

lolz

Actually, Warlorde challenged you to war next set... and instead of accepting it as a challenge, you treated him like some noob who would missle you out of the gates.

What do you say? I am being quite serious. I know there are more than five of you... or wait... (fights urge to make snide remark) kk. through that...

just ask around... if anything it will be entertaining.

You call that a challenge? Looks more like he was trying to organize a gangbang on RD tags, or as he put it "cause trouble" eventhough he said he had no issues with RD

you know what they say about kicking sleeping dogs, or hornets nets, or something along those lines :)

lmao, so someone challenges you to 5 v 5 and you call it a gang bang?

i'm sure any of us other 'fools' who want to war you would respect a 5 v 5 and not take part.

go ahead, accept the challenge

Thanks Slagpit!
That was the only way I could think of to get my posted deleted :P

-asking is just too hard

The challenge sounds boring. Next reset we'll have atleast 30 countries to fight from the sounds of things which is much more entertaining tha rolling around on the floor with 5 countries.

I think you don't know very much about RD. We don't have anything to 'prove'. Within our ranks from just the colors you know the identities of... we around 20 #1 ranked 1a/alliance finishes. (and that's just the ones you could know of). Some have led alliances, started alliances, and ended alliances from Titans to UCN, we've been around since before LaF even started as an alliance. What on earth could a 5-on-5 with a desheveled bunch of misfits do for us?

Your idea is basically just a waste of time. Go back to your think tank with Lords and try to get Yellow to be your first kill of the reset.

If my numbers are correct.... sofar the count is...

RD: 52 kills
BRated, MKZ1,2 Lords1,2,3,DTCP1,2,DaSnap: 0 kills

Teams that hit RD last reset...
Mademen : Tagged RoE this reset, all dead.
DTCP: Have all been killed, some multiple times
Lords: Have all been killed, most a few times over

We keep telling people that if they avoid us they won't have to even worry about us.. But it seems some random ant keeps wanting to prove a point and test the boundaries. They then get suprised (just like you guys seemed to be) when they get killed for

a. Stating that they were going to hit RD
b. Have team mates that then attack RD

W, you totally misread my post ... or did you even read it.

worlorde wasnt offering a challenge, he was looking to get in on hitting RD with others

Like Silver said, we have nothing to prove.

But if you keep poking a sleeping tiger, dont be surprised and then piss and moan when it eats your face off :)

Sorry to break this too you Silver, but my team isn't associated with Lords. We don't have pacts with anyone, nor do we x-retal, x-hit, x-share info, or any of that crap. If you checked the news before initiating a KR you would have seen that.

Our team has stood on it's own feet since team server started.

And if you think a 5 man team vs a 5 man team, on a five man team server would be boring, what are you even doing on here?

Brag all you want, but kills on a team server using multiple teams, are worthless. You didn't earn a thing.

i actually cannot read (true story). explains a lot.

Lords is definitely not associated with BRated other than knowing them some of them from other servers/clans

I'm not sure showing off your kill count, established by using multiple teams at once, really makes a difference regarding a proposed 5 vs. 5 battle. Not that I have anything to do with Lita, but if BRated is as good as she claims, then I would be interested to hear the results of a straight fight.

Lita why are you here challenging RD when you should be in the kitchen making a delicious meal for someone.

Boring challenge, have done it several times before. Maybe read Silver's post again before judging our players.

And besides, we already have enough wars planned the coming sets. ;)

After those dorks go back to strict teamplay, meaning no crosskilling, we'll gladly accept the challenge.

*lol* Wow Pain... that's the best you could come up with? I sincerely hope you didn't open with your best material.

And obviously the irony of such a statement is lost on you. I'm not the one avoiding a challenge. Instead of running your mouth, why not sign up and fight us?

Or are you too busy making silver a sandwich?

thats the best i figured i could use without getting banned.

my good material is far too offensive for this website, i dont wanna hurt feelings and catch a IP ban.

RD proved they are noobs hiding behind their numbers. they dont know what a challenge is. its terrible... i was asking RD for some fun. let the noobs hide behind their numbers. count all those DHs on my country when i wasnt even online

SPIN SPIN SPIN dagga!.... Oh wait..... he was obviously not organizing anything. Just wishing to join someone.

ummm, if you dont tag RD, how the hell do we avoid you? this sounds pretty familier . . .

When have you ever known RD to care about keeping a fight fair, little e? Did you really expect any different this time around?

http://forums.earthempires.com/...hy-you-have-red-countries

Hate to be the bearer of bad news but since you apparently need this spelled out for you... For the teams that were killed this reset there was no avoiding RD, they made that bed last reset.

So don't worry about it, you might hurt something.

And I'd really love to see where we attacked them last set de1i. We did not.

But don't worry about it, you might hurt something.

He was responding to archaic Lita.

We killed Warlorde for being a jackass.
You were messaged saying we wouldn't take any further action against anyone else in your tag.
You guys decided not to accept that so we killed the rest of you.

Pretty straight forward.

hehehe

RD cant justify their actions. I hurt their feelings so they decided to kill me

justified...

Actually Crimson, you messaged us after killing Warlorde for a forum post. The message was we killed your teammate, and as long as you don't interefere, you won't be targeted. Then your team added the addendum that you would keep attacking warlordes restart.

My response was quite straightforward. It asked, would you, yourself, and your team accept such actions? No. you wouldn't,

It's called a double standard, and it belies your intelligence. It goes hand in hand with the "do not hit us and you'll be safe, but let us remain untagged and hidden" mentality.

It's ok though. It will be just as enjoyable next round watching you remain hidden under your rocks for safety.

rocks for safety?
are they all those red countries?

*lol*

You do need your coffee.

Unfortunately I won't be getting any today.

Lita, just to help you out:



I'm sure RD would make sure their tag(s) are known before enforcing whatever policy they may have...

We're talking about coffee, de1i. You surely never getting anything else.

And ingame or on fora, all the same to us. If you're spouting off on the forum, we'll just kill ingame. Either you're leaving us alone or you don't. ;)

dustfp, I'll believe it when I see it.

And whether they are tagged or not, I don't see the point in running a strategy where everyone runs hundreds of turns on a kill run, over land that can be reclaimed with, wait for it, 2 turns.

This is a war game yes, but it's a game. One that everyone should be able to enjoy. Putting policies like that in place only shows that you take your enjoyment from ruining anothers enjoyment.

The only reason to put such a policy in place is if you want to netgain, which is counterintuitive to running turns on restarts.

you really don't get it, do you? RD actually just wanted to net in peace, told everyone to leave them alone or else. and guess what? people messed with them. and looked what happened. if you all weren't so zealous about trying to take on big bad RD, you could be just playing this game in peace, netting, and not with dead countries. it's your own fault, stop running your mouth, and you can go back to what you and your team wanted to do. net.

hmm, CT somehow makes sense. Surprising :P
Now can I have your country number? ;)

nnnnno. i do not accept your propositions for good times ronnie.

nobody forced your player to want to war us. If you didn't like the policy, you should have just stayed away. When the rest of you followed, and got killed as a result, what did you expect in a war game.



When did you become an expert on policies and why they are there? Was it before or after your players wanted to war us and got your tag killed? YES players. 1 was killed for being a jackass. The others were killed when you jumped in and didn't want to leave us alone. You made your bed, now your countries are buried 6 feet under it. Glad you are having fun. Expect more.

Yes, it was fun killing you. You got what you wanted. Hope you enjoyed it as much as we did.



Were we supposed to wait for you to come back online? Did you send a notice out? What next? Your group want to limit the kinds of attacks, the times of day and who can attack who? It's a wargame. You provoked and lost.

You're wasting your energy LC - they're never gonna get it. Hopefully they'll just eventually get bored of dying.

if they really want to netgain, maybe they'll get a more sensible policy...one conducive to netgaining?

either way, i don't mind dying again and again. not sure why people get so flustered about it.

RD has had one of the most reasonable and easy to understand philosophies since forever:

Do not mess with them and they will not mess with you.

Their 1:kill policy is just another reflection of this philosophy. A philosophy (and policy) they time and time again have proven they are (capable and) willing to enforce.

I've had plenty of run ins with the colors and found them completely reasonable to deal with if you treat them with respect. They understand mistakes happen and more than likely are willing to negotiate when they do.

Unfortunately people are unable to look beyond RD's checkered past and just leave them be. So on that note...

/popcorn

-

de1i you stud, long time no see.

I'm a lurker. Your brother still play? You guys make it out of your teenage years yet ;)?

i think it should be noted that this set, an RD country accidentally grabbed me, and they were very reasonable and forthright in their FA process in dealing with the situation.

Alot more reasonable than most people recently in a certain other server..

I'm guessing you didn't whine, were relatively polite, and treated them with a little respect.

To paraphrase the old title, knowing how to win friends and influence people is a rare skill in the world these days.

Your problems did not start with hitting RD. Your problems started with a certain big mouth in your tag so our "hidden" tags have nothing to do with your situation at all.

As far as accepting such actions ... you only "accept" what you want to accept or cannot retaliate against. I think you know what our stance is on that.

RD net in peace? lol, like that will ever happen . . . Sadly, being charming and witty cheating deuchebags does not eliminate the 'cheating deuchebags' part. Thus, a small core group of folks will never forgive or forget.

If you DON'T tag up RD, you will get grabbed as part of the general course of the game, you will kill the grabber, fun times will ensue.

If you DO tag up RD, I (and others) will constantly suicide you. You will respond with detah, initiating party time in romper room.

Rinse. Repeat.

Douche, not deuche.

And yet w/ that attitude, your tag still whines when RD kills you off for "no reason".....BRILLIANT!

I still have yet to see anyone posting proof that RD is currently cheating though. Would that just maybe be a broad assumption based on a fair amount of bitterness, and even more arrogance?