There's one idiot holding a grudge here, and it's against a three year old dead tag. You're smart enough to see that.

What am I endorsing?, Last time I checked, I reached out to SF for a pact for next set, then I get accused of having a hand in suiciders, and now YOU Derrick accuse me of saying something I didn't say...dafuq, get your facts straight, dude LOL

I see you backing up celphi and his garbage rhetoric about a three year old tag

And I see a bunch of hcfc people chilling with him...

2+2=4?

This bs rhetoric is the entire reason I brought a team of people to kill hcfc last set.

Where am I backing it up, show me.

Show me that too.

Hcfc last set is just rybka this set minus getafix and rokkie plus one, no?

I'm gonna have to consider that hcfc feels this dumb elders rhetoric that cost me a place to net on the server, is ok and will attack my netting tags because of it.

Why should I feel otherwise?

No

Rybka is Rybka, HCaFC is HCaFC, we don't have members, we are reset to reset players, we come and go.

I mean look bro. Hes still on it.

And my netting tag had NOTHING to do with elders but it didnt stop him from blindsiding us.

You are delusional to think that way, but carry on.

Celphi is in Rybka, take it up with him.

I'm still waiting for this allegation to be shown to me.

Until hes in hcfc again next set spewing the same bs rhetoric.

Celphi was hcfc last set, rybka this set
Mrford was hcfc 3 sets ago, hit with hcfc last set, is rybka this set
I'm assuming drunck was hcfc last set and is rybka this set

How am I doing so far?

IF he plays next set in the HC tag and does it, then you can go ahead and accuse me of supporting his rhetoric, until then you're shooting piss upwind.

Btw. The irony of former elder drunck being on the other side is not lost on me.

Rybka is as much elder as darkness is haha

You are doing great, they WERE in HC, they ARE NOT this set.

So you supported the elder trash talk last set but not this set.

Noted.

Like I said before...
#6

https://www.eestats.com/team/country/9

They couldn't do it alone. Needed more players beyond their team to coordinate. Pathetic!

That's why your head blew up, you think people are not independent and BELONG to tags forever once they join it, you have no concept of independent persons.

When you thought to bring hcfc back I wished you luck and said it was totally welcome to have all x netters. I too was netting at the time and elders had been dead for several sets.

Since then I was blindsided netting by people you have no problem with chilling in your tag. If that doesnt make us natural enemies, nothing will.

That ain't me bro. I'm talking specifically about the elders stuff that celphi is saying.

You are a special kind of stupid, I didn't even play, idiot.

I am not Celphi.

I still have the messages of Derrick begging me to play on TEAM a year ago. He's pathetic too.

Then he comes in here trying to act all tough because he running an alliance on a TEAM server.

Again, I.AM.NOT.CELPHI.

I'm starting to understand why so many people can't stand him :-/ you and I had differences in the past and we worked it out, this guy pushes and pushes and pushes and makes up fluff and pushes it...fluff me, makes me want to punch a baby in the face :-(

@koh,
Yes we did-- we moved passed it.

I played HCnFC one set and somehow HCnFC is connected to me for life. Oh guess what Derrick-- I was in VILLIANS one set too. Does that mean you're going to attack them too?

@celphi when we got 2nd place total team nw all time was that elders too?

And no, you had a lid on about elders nonsense when you were in villains.

I'm just saying that elder crap you're still on works both ways. Elders is as much rybka as they are darkness. Rybka is as much hcfc as darkness is elders.

Which is to say, not at all. One is not independent unless all are assumed independent. If none are assumed independent than it's safe to assume rybka is hcfc.

Follow the logic?

You cant call darkness "elders" and not call rybka "hcfc"

It's the same bs rhetoric that ran my netting tag off the server so you have to understand my stance against it.

I can be sorry in the future if hcfc is the collateral to prove a point.

And that point is that both superfly and getafix and everyone else get along just dandy. Celphi just has a stick up his ass for anyone associated with people from a 3 year dead tag.

More like, lack thereof logic, fluff me... LOL whatever, I digress.

It if happens, it'll be hilarious and it'll show your hypocrisy, ball is in your court, dawg.

I dont blindside netters bro. Thats celphi behavior. I'm merely proving a point.

You miss some major points.

Demon is from ELDERS and has played & still plays in DARKNESS multiple sets INCLUDING THIS SET.
ELDERS/DARKNESS attacks netting clans.
ELDERS/DARKNESS attack all xplore countries.
ELDERS/DARKNESS attack at end of sets to ruin players chances of winning server.
ELDERS/DARKNESS uses 6+ countries to win against formidable opponents.

RYBKA attacks WAR clans.
RYBKA uses a single team of 4 to war other single teams. We don't need 6+ players to win.
HCnFC is a netting clan.

Very different.

This thread got traded fast. And I'm not sure DrunK is in my tag this set? Pretty sure he isnt.

Nah bro. Superfly just farms the fluff out of people when he nets. He did it when he was tagged zz. He did it when he was tagged superfly. He does it when he is tagged darkness.

Darkness didnt hit anyone to ruin their chances netting. Superfly played the server exactly how he plays the server every time. That's a huge difference. I've even showed you a country where he got first place doing exactly what he did the sey getafix suicided him. So theres a huge difference there.

After a tag suicides before retal convo, that tag usually dies on team server. Especially against a wartag. I would wager that elders was far more malicious. I've seen SF net that way too many times here and usually I'm the one who gets irritated by it.

Elders does all of the things you listed above I think, but to this point darkness hasnt. And as everyone but you can seemingly agree on is that it doesnt matter what tag someone was in 3 years ago, so demon being elders should be irrelevant unless, you know, rybka is hcfc. You were hcfc last set. Same thing right?

Getafix got mad at SF for doing some fluff SF has done in half a dozen tags on this server including ZZ. Geta suicided a warclan and got his tag killed. Don't get it twisted man. I've had a chat with ZZ before because SF hit me. I've had a chat with darkness too because SF hit me. He did the same thing in ZZ. And that's what sparked a war. Nothing else man. Has nothing to do with elders at all. That's just how SF nets.

Again....

i promised the guys in my team that I wouldn't reply anymore because of how dense and pointless it is to have any discussion with Celphi but its hard to sit in the sidelines and read his blatant lies.

Here is the hard and verifiable truth if you want to spend 5 minutes on eestats:

Darkness started in reset 102 after 2 of us who are still in Darkness were netting as tag SuperFly and blinded by CWG under DruncKs instructions.

Set 102 Oct 1 - On our first set as Darkness we got in a battle with CWG and Reborn.

Set 103 Nov 1 - we netgained as Darkness

Set 104 Dec 2 - We are netgaining and we are hit by untaggeds, NOOB and CWG blind side style.

Set 105 Jan - Once again netgaining and we are hit by multiple untaggeds and we FS CWG in retaliation for last set.

Set 106 Feb 2 - We are netgaining again and I am on track for a top 3 finish and I am AB'ed by Getafix and Darkness retaliates by FSing HCnFC and throwing our netgaining set away.

Set 107 Mar 5 - We come preppared to war as two darkness tags plus 1 untagged as we from day one we are told that HCnFC and Zag are coming after us. Turned out that they also had assistance from multiple untaggeds & one Panda country so it is a pretty even war numbers wise.

Set 108 right now - Netgaining as a single tag as our beef with Getafix is supposed to be over and blind sided by Rybka


Yes Darkness is really the bad guy in this picture. The funny thing about all of this is that Celphi loves posting stats and he loves to pretend that he knows everything but is blatantly lying out of his ass and its funny as fluff as everything that I just posted is easily verifiable by looking at eestats.

Now he is talking about how we have one untagged that jumped on our KR and ignores the fact that he had a player run two countries to attack us right out of protection. He then waited for us to use all of our turns to kill that untagged suicider and then he AB'ed FS'ed Darkness who by all historical eestats proof has been a netgaing tag.

The irony of Celphi blindsiding Darkness the netter tag is funny as hell lol

now I will go back to the side lines and chuckle at whatever other lies Celphi comes up with now that everyone can click on eestats and look for themselves that what i posted is truth :)

I think this thread today has had more activity and posts than all of the other boards combined in the last 3 days lol

In deed :-)

Let's examine your comments, shall we?


I'm not ignoring it. I can't control who you've pissed off other sets. However., if you notice., our clan didn't coordinate with him/her/them to attack you. Plus,. it seems like one person whose restart got you a 2nd time. This is very different from coordinating with a 6th player to attack a clan of 4.


Just plain false. I announced to my members on day 1 to attack your clan on a specific turn #. There wasn't no waiting for anything like that. And if you're seriously trying to say your clan (Darkness) is historically a netting clan you're full of it., lol.

his·tor·i·cal·ly
/hiˈstôrik(ə)lē,hiˈstärik(ə)lē/
adverb
with reference to past events.
in the past.

Uhm., in the past (last set) your "historically netting clan" FS HCnFC. I don't need an eestats for that.

Like i said-- brag about your fake stats. Your team of 5 didn't do nothing without coordinated help. I totally predicted you would have additional players to come save you. And I was right. You clowns are so predictable & pathetic.

All we need now is marshal

No, please no, that will ruin the thread!