Originally
posted by
Pang:
I don't want to sound like an alarmist and I'm sure I'll be flamed for it, but I feel that I must state that the site was an RD venture and they consider it "theirs" like Boxcar was LaF's or GHQ is SOL's. Keep in mind that there have been past instances where RD members abused data access (legit or illegitimate) and some are still active behind the scenes. I'd at least use a unique password for this site (although, best practice is to use a unique password for _EVERY_ site :)). I don't like that I have to post this, but 4 out of 4 hosting site data breaches were done by people affiliated with RD.
Regardless, it's a rich feature set and nice to see active hosting development taking place again! :) More and active hosting options = win!
Well, guess a thank you is in order for the second paragraph, but I'm not sure where you get off thinking that the site was an RD venture? I'm ICN, the site was made spring 2012 for ICN, and the only reason I've opened it up is because ICN is dying and I didn't want to code for just a few people, and so much time went into the site that I didn't want to abandon it either. Only affiliation RD has with my site is that they were willing to help beta test my site, and this was before the whole boxcar/RD issue became known.
Can I say that the site is 100% secure, absolutely not, nothing is, and I won't ever make that promise; However, i'm always at work on the site and constantly improving it.
So to sum it all up:
Is myCLAN an RD venture? No way, it was an ICN one, which I've actually stepped down from leadership in ICN last week, and haven't actually played the game in 2 or 3 sets now.
Does RD call myCLAN theirs? Not to my knowledge, but that I can care less about.. I love building the site for people, and it's everyones who uses it in my opinion, hence the name myCLAN
Anyways, appreciate everyone's kind comments :)