Not trying to be funny as I was never pro this war anyways just asking if #60 ws tagged RAGE at the start and still alive means no tag kill?

Nope

#60 was not tagged Rage at the start.

you guys got your numbers wrong? #60 died the 9th. #53 was Laf until the 18th.

Yeah, #53 did not want to war and was allowed to tag under LaF.

Technically, SoL did not get the tagkill, because they did not kill #242, however, they clearly could have if they had agree to the ceasefire to be a few hours, or a day later, so I will not argue that they didn't get it. The war was no longer fun (I guessing for both sides) by the point that the CF was called.

I was going to make a sarcastic post about how Rage was claiming victory, but I figured people would take it too seriously and flame us for it. Anyway, SoL won the war and recognized there was no point continuing on with it. It doesn't matter if it was a technical tagkill or not, as they clearly could have gotten it if they wanted to.

Well fought!

The numbering system worked! But only on some forum chump and not the SOL warchat leaders.

I would also add to Juice's post that #242 was a small semi-active country and as such with only limited turns used was no real threat nor I am sure not a priority. I would have to go back and re-look but dont think they ever did a single attack either.

So yea they could have killed it easily enough had no CF been declared. Whether you want to include such an original country as part of tag kill or not, guess technically no, but imho it may as well have been.

So congrats to SoL on a well fought war and congrats to SoL for tag kill at least imho.