I presume banned or chocking on his own vomit.

Blade must be sucking air out of a colostomy bag then.

https://youtu.be/K8E_zMLCRNg

bonus

more bonus

Fake post to make the troll trio get excited
Bonus!

The Anthem of Blade's people


https://youtu.be/of0m82D5EJs

At least you know what you are Lil scotty. So predictable and pathetic you are
Troll

Says the tranny who can't read...

Make bonuses great again

+1

So that's the end of your original thoughts troll?
Resorting to post manipulation now..how droll.

i like how you fluff about original thoughts, but your retorts have been the exact same for the past couple days.

dance fool, dance!

Its not funny to beat a dead tranny? What you wanna volley around next fancy britches? Walk me through the decision to buy a new kia.

I'll walk you thru it easy jackass.
By first you look around your own house and tell me about the Made in USA you find. Idiot.
I've had dozens of cars and trucks,all " American" mostly chevys but then I needed a car for my daughter to run around at college.
Something reliable,economical and she liked it. So I bought it. After three months tho she said she never uses it because Madison has such a greatbus system and her fiancee has three vehicles.
So she gives it back to me and my wife drives it daily. I run it on the weekends if I can.
I'll tell you tho,that KIA is the best friggin car I've ever had.
Great on gas, a very good ride, and a super sound system. I'll probably buy another one .
Never had a mechanical problem with it,not something I can say about any of the "american" cars I've owned.

So cry to someone else about buying foreign.
And how many foreign parts are in "american" cars these days?
Or has that changed since they were bailed out?

What next troll?
I'm unamerican because I like Chinese food and Thai?

You know that that kia was more than likely made in Georgia right?

Has the paint started to fall off it yet? It will. And the transmission will go next. They are cheap for a reason. What other manufacturer has ever offered buy one get one free?

If you go Korean, atleast go Hyundai. Owned by the same company but not AS fluffty. Or buy a used Civic or corolla if you want reliability and are poor.

Which kinda blows Lil Scotty's remarks I suppose.

Which remarks are you referring to retard. I wasn't the one pointing out you drove a piece of fluff Kia. I called you out for being a transsexual retard.

That's it Scotty, I'm done with you.
Asshole

Yaaaa
A simple fluff you would have sufficed. Do yourself a favor, dont drive another brand, you may have your opinion stomped on.

Well this thread got off its original topic, no surprise,

Back to the original, DAM the choices suck, think I'll go with Johnson, the libertarian

if thread stays in orig topic then posters have gotten sick.

Has this been done yet?

Most of these people voting for Trump would have been Nazis in 1936.

Nazi's were socialists... They wouldn't vote for trump. In fact, Hillary supports eugenics, so they would probably support her.

Scott, provide evidence that Clinton supports eugenics.

Also, the Nazi party loathed socialism and Goebbels railed against the Soviet Union and socialism in his propaganda machine.

I don't want to hear talk radio logic. I want to hear logic.

We discussed it in earlier threads.

Hillary Clinton admits she admired Margeret Sangerwho was one of the pioneers of eugenics in the US.


Lol - you really think the blue camp is different than the red camp? Poor kid.

"We discussed it in earlier threads" does not constitute evidence for your claim. Try again.

Promoting a false equivalency between red and blue also does not make you avante garde, Scott. It makes you subject to fallacy. Especially when your political views are well known on AT anyway.

Now answer the question. It's just for fun. Who do you think would be more likely to vote Nazi, given a different time and place? Sanders supporters? Clinton supporters? Trump supporters?

http://kodegarment.com/...16%20-%20blue-600x600.png

God I hope we don't get trump. Obama was bad enough, I don't want a HUGE liberal running things. We can't spend anymore money! And king of running companies into the ground having the ability to bankrupt the US? fluff, this guy is the biggest liberal we've ever had running for office!

King of running companies into the ground? really? 4 times out of how many business ventures?

His bankruptcy record is actually better than average for developers like himself. besides, chapter 11 bankruptcies are reorganizations, not liquidations. Not to mention, he was an investor, not manager of these casinos. You blame warren buffet for every failed investment? He has more than 4. The difference is Trump is vain enough to put his name on every single investment. Others dont to avoid fallout from failure.

seriously. hate on him for all the other legit reasons there are. dont make up bullfluff.

My political views are well known - I prefer anarchy. As for "evidence", it is out there and you can see for yourself. You seem like the type who isn't employed and has plenty of time on their hands.

Like I said - all of them are cut from the same cloth, you are just too ignorant and brain washed to see it.

We aren;t already bankrupt? Usually going into $19-20 Trillion in debt will cause you to go bankrupt. At least this jackass would have experience escaping it : )

Honest answer, I'd give Sanders and Trump supporters about equal odds of being swept up into such a movement. Both campaigns are about hate, jealousy, scapegoats and anger. Trump makes foreign people the scapegoat, Sanders makes the wealthy the scapegoat. Both tactics are evil.

Clinton supporters are not far behind in my estimation. Because seriously... if you're willing to support somebody as dishonest as her - no matter how many times she proves her dishonesty - you're probably willing to follow her into just about anything.

Good answer Sam.

Scott, I do not deal with frauds. You are a fraud.

When asked to provide evidence for a claim, you say it's been discussed in other threads, then tell me to go find the evidence for myself. You either have no concept of the burden of proof, or choose to ignore it. I have no desire to dig up evidence on why someone might choose to believe that Clinton espouses eugenics. It's an outlandish claim, and so I'm rather more interested in seeing what (no doubt entertaining) evidence you might provide for it.

I see that when you're asked for facts and evidence, you resort to trolling and name calling, then pass the buck on substantiating your claims.

That is your reputation to choose. If you choose to play a game of rhetoric, I will let you play with yourself.

I deal in facts.

Lol it has already been provided... but video evidence for retards not knowing how to type http://www.google.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4o4WizW2mQ

More information on Margeret's Role in Eugenics:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/...rgaret-sanger-eugenicist/

"Sanger shaped the eugenics movement in America and beyond in the 1930s and 1940s. Her views and those of her peers in the movement contributed to compulsory sterilization laws in 30 U.S. states that resulted in more than 60,000 sterilizations of vulnerable people, including people she considered “feeble-minded,” “idiots” and “morons.”

My favorite though was her attendance at a KKK rally...

straight from Hillaries suck to MSers view on Eugenics, which Hillary admires.

Get back to your progressive fluff slobbing.

Your ideas about trump were all rhetoric. Prove they weren't.

You mean the question I posed?

I take it you don't like it when someone poses difficult questions to you. Questions that make you think outside the box of the plumbing supply shop where you've been using the company computer to rack up 856 posts of lying, trolling, flaming, manipulating, and scheming. Anything but dealing with the difficulty of truth. Anything but working.

Did you put the Trump bumper stickers on the trucks there?

Make AT great again Scott. Make Trump proud!

I don't have time for the Scotts of the world who ignore facts and truth. I am a man of science. I deal in facts. We all have too much to do on a daily basis to wade through the bullfluff that people like you are flooding our world with. We don't have time to deal with manipulators, liars, and schemers.

Get off AT and get back to work.

Had to post this. AT was never great. It was fun and funny but never great.

No, your actual statements. I have yet to see any bit of facts, truth, or anything that wasn't a pile of bullfluff.

So you think I am a trump supporter, great. Like I said, you are too retarded to see there is no discernible difference between the red and the blue team....

There we go, more ego. You have nothing to contribute but that which serves the purposes of making you feel better about yourself.

We have nothing to learn from you and you choose to learn nothing from us. Time and time again the Scott of AT has taken a pass on opportunities for reasonable, possibly even constructive discussion in favor of insulting others and twisting the truth. If you do it on AT, you probably do it elsewhere.

Pathetic.

Elevating yourself above the two party system is a popular and fruitless effort. Yes, the two party system is non-ideal. Yes, it dilutes and conflates issues that might otherwise get fair forum. Yes, it fails to give us exactly the choice we want, when we want it. Sometimes we even get a whole two uninspiring choices. All two choices, completely uninspiring. Time for us to go cry in our tea.

But it is our political system, and we choose to make something of it. You want to tout yourself as a Gary Johnson devotee? Put a Galt Life sticker on your bumper? Enjoy the sidelines, and be sure to make frequent mention of how the prevailing political system doesn't suit your fancy so you can appear and feel to be above the entire structure of elected office in the United States. Ok buddy.

The reality of the situation is that ideas are in the field and progress is being made, whether you and your ego choose to participate or not. Setting up a false equivalency between the two political parties is worse than pointless, it is counterproductive, undermining the potential for constructive debate before it can even start. These two parties, all the microscale and interpersonal relationship intricacies notwithstanding, are at war with each other Scott. Do you not see billions of dollars in play? Do you see "no discernible difference" between the two opposing forces anywhere in the wide range of issues over which there is bitter disagreement and intransigence?

Politics is the largest game, and it's not being played solely for your entertainment, or even your self-serving wholesale denunciation.

Man up. Use your head for something other than lying and putting others down.

Why would I learn anything from a retard like yourself? It would be like asking a 700lbs chick for weight loss advise.

Still waiting for "evidence" to your claims...

I have claimed that you are incapable of rational, fact-based discussion.

You have evidenced that well.

I have showed you evidence to my claim. I can't help it that your bias makes you lose your fluff.

Go vote for trump, he is as big of a joke as criminal Hillary and Retarded Bernie. I suppose you would vote for the person you think will give you the most "free" fluff.

The truly amazing thing here is that in a country of 300 Million people, Trump, Clinton and Sanders are the most likely candidates for the office of the President.

It's very funny that this is so, it reminds me of the campaigns to be president of the student council in grade school. Same style of campaigning being run by all comers.

Not one of the candidates are even slightly interested in the "truth", simply their own spin on it.

And, it's not going to matter one way or the other who wins, they are all equally bad, therefore, the US has no future going forward.

There will be a great conflagration driven by the lack of food and water that will happen when the economy collapses, the nation will be balkanized and eventually a leader will emerge at some point in the future, and life will go on for those that remain.

The best part, is I have stopped giving a crap about it. LOL

I hope that you all have a great time in the future.

The two party system which is giving us worse and worse choices each election cycle only exists because people are afraid. Afraid that, as you said, their desires will be left "on the sidelines" if they don't pick between team red and team blue. The only thing that makes it impossible for someone from outside the two major parties to win, is the false belief that it is impossible. I believe that this year could be a banner year for people who hold liberty dear. The choices that the two "mainstream" parties are going to give us are SO terrible this time that while we may not see a win for the Libertarian party, we could at least see it gaining enough voters to blow this defeatist argument out of the water going forward. Or maybe we'll see team red or team blue realize that what the majority of Americans want is liberty.... and actually move in that direction. Either way, a vote for a third party candidate - especially this time around - is not a wasted vote.



Progress is being made? I suppose that depends on your definition of progress.

For people like Scott and myself who hold liberty above all else in politics, the equivalency between the two current major parties is not false at all. Both parties love tyranny when it will gain them more votes. Yes, they're at war with each other, but what are they fighting over? They want power, plain and simple. They want to RULE - not represent - the American people.

The only progress I see being made lately is back towards feudalism. We've replaced the term "lord" with "senator", but we are moving closer to that failed system today and further from the constitutional republic this nation was set up to be. More and more over the last century, we've declared that the fruits of your labor do not belong to you. They belong to your lord, who will decide how they are best spent. Of course, he will let you keep some. He doesn't want you angry enough to turn your pitchfork on him. But ultimately, it is his choice, not yours, how you will live and what you will believe.

...

This...

I don't identify as a Democrat or Republican myself, as I agree with some things of both parties, but I don't decry someone else's opinions as being Godless/Communist/Socialist/Fascist/et al. just because they don't share the same opinion as me.

I'd like to consider myself a Jeffersonian Democrat.

This guy litteraly supports somewhome who identfies himself as a socialist...