Search For Author: smikke - Earth Empires Forum

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 14th 2010, 1:56:44

Ok, you're retarded:
- you obviously don't understand the point I'm making with LCN
- you obviously don't understand that if SOL said "iMag FAed LaF" and FSed you, the reason would be crap - much in the same way your reason for hitting Fist originally was
- you obviously don't understand that your leaders threatened LCN and Fist on the boards and denied us a pact

So yeah, I'm done with you as well. You started our borderline reasonable but turned to retard-iMagger pretty fast.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 14th 2010, 0:53:46

SoF's improved a lot. Would be interesting, especially if they can keep up their new "success"

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 14th 2010, 0:51:59

"Anyhow, fact is TIE received a considerable amount of FA and you were caught doing it. I think its safe to assume you did most of it."

I keep saying this - we had ONE country FAing. You have NEVER shown proof to the contrary.

"We dont need an excuse. As far as I`m concerned the war with Fist didnt end two sets ago."
What about LCN? Or are you too chickenfluff to hit a bigger alliance?

"We had no reason to give a uNAP. You threatened us as well, so this is moot."
We might have been insulting you, but threatening... unlikely (just do the numbers - same reason you're scared of LCN...). Find me a quote.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 13th 2010, 17:17:49

ibujke: Do you think the war with LCN against you had something to do with Soviet threatening us on AT and iMag denying us a uNAP? Obviously there was some element of retaliation involved, both LCN and Fist were pissed off at iMag, but fact is we were told that you guys were going to hit us again AND we had a uNAP refused...

So there goes your excuse for this set ;)

And we still think the original "reason" was crap because we had no FA contact from you guys and we still insist it was one country sending FA.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 13th 2010, 13:46:45

Originally posted by Riddler:

I thought one of The Fist members and I had a good thing going with a land trading thing. I even asked him first and let him hit first, we did it for awhile it benefitted us both with ghost acres, as soon as he said he was finished I agreed and did not hit the Fist again. I dont know what topfeeds they are talking aboutm I though for sure we worked everything out through FA nicely, Rage doesnt have an impossible retal policy like some. If we hit you retal it or vice versa...seems logical to me

The RAGE stuff was last set, we did have a good thing with you guys this set. At the same time, the headaches we had over you and PDM last set were a bit too much ;) But it all builds up, we start hating the server mroe and more everytime a clan does an RoR and has some FA not do anything about it...

But as Spawn said, you, PDM and LaF were pretty minor factors in the end. LaF was a factor this set but not previously, you guys last set but not this set. Mostly iMag.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 12th 2010, 23:25:57

Originally posted by mrford:

I forgot to mention. I was told by SoF to leave my country in vacation mode till the cf, so we had atleast 1 retal capable country.

So all you goobers out there lickin ur chops over the low NW NA, I wouldn't if I was you. :)

I thought NA did country:country retals? ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 12th 2010, 18:35:25

I'd consider RD a new clan as well, just because EEVIL was so small compared to RD now :)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 11th 2010, 20:52:32

so once again it's back to the "we FSed big clans in 2005" that Tavi was using in another thread

since your random FS on LaF, you've only chosen wars that were easy (note the chosen there because LCN was the one who FSed you :P)

and now you've helped a bunch of players in Fist and ICN make up their minds about leaving the game.

good job, Soviet, keep it up :)

/I'm out

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 11th 2010, 20:42:17

so basically Soviet, you're too scared to hit LCN so you take it out on us? 'cause last I checked, LCN made most of the decisions those two sets ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 11th 2010, 20:14:24

Originally posted by Soviet:

Okay so my reasons are invalid based on how many times you got LCN to smack us in a gangbang? Once again, your stupid policies, landgrabbing, and retarded FA led you to this.

I'm looking around. All I see are a couple whiney baby Fisters, agitated ICNers, NA trolls, and Pang and Slag. You are putting too much credit on these few people for the "real" feelings of the server.

No one said you started the conflict. iMag did when we FSed you way back when. You simply didn't man up and take the beating and gain anyone's respect. You got LCN to smash us that set. The set after you went into LCNs tag and farmed us for the whole set. The set after we tried to pact, but your terms were fluffing retarded and we wouldn't agree to them.

Can you not see why we are here at this point in time, smashing the fluff out of you while you walk away from the game?

On the topic of retal policy- iMag's policy is standard 1:1. You didn't happen to notice any of us taking L:L this set have you?

Oh, so you're hitting us NOW because we didn't pact you last set?
Or maybe you're hitting us now because you pissed off LCN and they hit you the next set after you refused a pact?
Basically, you don't have a reason and you're destroying this server and it's obvious to most people here that you're doing that.
I bet your reason for hitting ICN is just as good...

PS: about L:L, once again proves you make up policies to start fights. remember that DH earlier that set? it was on 1 grab. You took a second after your DH and said "land:land"

@Pain: I think the only people here that think iMag was justified in its actions this set are iMag and Ivan.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 11th 2010, 19:51:39

Ok, so you've made up some crap reasons no one believes for why you drove Fist from the game, now what about ICN?

Soviet: Take a look around you. Everyone except for SoF seems to think your actions are stupid, petty and detrimental to the game.

Now you're trying to make it seem like we started this conflict with you and it wasn't just a case of you being bored and starting a conflict by coming up with an excuse, which is easy for you because you don't have retal policies like real clans.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 11th 2010, 10:42:44

Originally posted by ZIP:

and locket if you quote me again saying we like to net rather then war ( and i know you want to ) STFU !! we have the right to change our mind. besides anyone who knows how to play this game knows that if you want a top 10 finish you need to be in a large netting alliance or go home. ( over 30 )

Funny you should say that when Fist had a few countries with pretty decent stocks...

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 21:15:22

wow, iMag also FSing ICN, another alliance that's close to leaving the game.

good going Soviet!

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 21:14:28

sweet

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 21:13:36

and here comes the iMag FS.

iMag once again demonstrating to everybody just what an asset they are to this server :)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 21:12:16

I think LCN gets toma :P

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 21:08:10

I'll be joining you but I think most of us will quit.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 20:33:15

there's a goodbye post coming by Spawn for Fist soonish

basic gist of it is that it's no fun playing on a server where hte politics are this retarded. special thanks to our friends at iMag for the random FS a few sets ago and completely unreasonable FA talks since then ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 19:59:54

yeah not much fun for us so dont think we'll be fighting back.

enjoy yourselves though. 3 person FS must have been a blast.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 19:47:11

Yeah, well done Ely, you suck at netting so you FS the smallest clan you can find. It's like... you tried grabbing us, failed and came out behind so now you FS us because a week ago we had twice your avg. land.

We're probably not going to fight back and we're leaving the server next set anyway. So umm.. good job.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Nov 10th 2010, 19:20:16

Steps to mediocrity:
1) Start grabbing Fist
2) Get grabbed back, generally fail to retal
3) Realize you're a fluff clan that was until half of Fist in avg. land terms and FS Fist

Well done guys.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 29th 2010, 18:43:23

Originally posted by ZIP:

me thinks NA's reunion / net set is bout to go POOF !!

NA doesn't look like it's netting to me ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 28th 2010, 21:15:09

I hate to resurrect this thread but...

Fooglmog: Are you sure iMag is actually using the right formulas for attacking? I'm curious because you seem to fail a much larger percentage of your grabs/retals than most clans.

2010-10-28 20:54:52 PS Zarcon Made Me (#551) bc iMagNum Fist of Terror (#70) bc TheFist DH
2010-10-28 17:57:46 PS Soviet Union (#119) bc iMagNum 1Odin2RuleValhalla3 (#162) bc TheFist DH
2010-10-27 02:37:36 PS Zarcon Made Me (#551) bc iMagNum 11th Field Artillery Battalion (#310) bc xNAx DH

those three are after the failed retal that this dispute started over (so 25/10)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 26th 2010, 1:11:45

Fooglmog: Allowing DHs to not count towards a retal quota effectively allows you to lemming down big retal targets... Which I'm not sure any clan would allow.

Not to mention DHs aren't really that common. Oversending by something like 10% is more than enough to all but eliminate them - I really haven't seen many failed retals this set.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 24th 2010, 23:47:13

im just sad i cant get into any weed parties now :(

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 20th 2010, 10:43:10

Well, I know Foog lied about the Fist FA so what other reasons are bullfluff?

We had one country FAing and you didn't ask us. And you never proved otherwise.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 19th 2010, 2:26:17

Interesting stuff. Definitely wouldn't put it above NA to do this... but I think several other clans coordinate solo server stuff on forums so... but pretty gay of them to boot someone for pointing it out.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 13th 2010, 22:17:15

Originally posted by Pang:

None of the fighting alliances can be considered to be #1 until such a time that they fight other fighting alliances of similar or equal size. SoL vs SoF would be a good start. Collab vs Imag as well.

None of the netting alliances can be considered #1 until they get either more members, better war departments, or both.

The idea that fighters won't fight other fighters (when they present any level of challenge) is one of the core reasons the politics on this server absolutely suck.

Fighting alliances should take that "we're not signing pacts" attitude and apply it to people who can challenge them fighting (and whose focus and goal is to fight), not just to alliances who are looking to avoid war and net.

Collab vs. iMag happened last set, and in the end the alliances were fairly similar in terms of final net etc. (if I recall correctly)

Difference was of course that Collab was also fighting PDM, SoF and EEVIL ;)

edit: otherwise agree completely

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 11th 2010, 1:02:21

Fist :P

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 10th 2010, 23:15:34

Sorry, don't have ICQ and Spawn is away. Can a LaF FA contact PM me here?

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 9th 2010, 22:04:30

Originally posted by gwagers:

Originally posted by smikke:

SoF as number 2 for war?

lmao. SoF has beat ICN when they had the FS, but other than that when was the last time they won without calling in allies/having a massive numbers advantage?

I seem to remember that the only way they "beat" ICN was by calling in help, too...

talking about the time SoF FSed ICN. I know ICN won last set.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 9th 2010, 15:33:21

btw I should add that I'm not saying that SOL isn't a top 3 warring alliance ;)

Collab and SOL are up there. LaF and LCN would probably beat SoF in a 1vs1 though.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 9th 2010, 15:08:51

SoF as number 2 for war?

lmao. SoF has beat ICN when they had the FS, but other than that when was the last time they won without calling in allies/having a massive numbers advantage?

As far as your promises to iMag, Makinso, didn't you basically ok the LCN and Fist plan the set before we hit iMag? Kinda takes away the "we were unprepared and netting" excuse, since you knew about a war, decided to net anyway and then used the netting as an excuse for what happened to you in the war.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 9th 2010, 15:02:43

great start to RD alliance ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 7th 2010, 22:15:42

i can confirm that

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 2nd 2010, 1:11:35

Originally posted by Detmer:

Originally posted by mrford:

PDM

well played by imag, they said they would be hitting PDM, so we backed off

then they hit WITH PDM

thought it was a well played political move myself

You were going to war PDM over what you considered to be 4 RoRs? That is pretty pathetic. Glad you screwed yourselves over. This server definitely needs more people who do everything in their power to stifle landgrabbing.

Maybe PDM should just stop RoRing?

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Oct 1st 2010, 9:04:27

Yes, best alliance pound for pound. But the reason they're winning TNW is because LaF and Collab are at war and LCN is in an "integration" set.

But if you want to talk about Omega, Evo's been almost just as good...

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 30th 2010, 22:25:06

ok well get back to me someday ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 30th 2010, 21:23:30

messaged

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 19th 2010, 7:45:47

Originally posted by Fooglmog:

K, well it doesn't look like Fist farmed Monsters. At least, not unreasonably so.

The people from Fist who're posting in this thread do seem awfully defensive though... especially for a thread which they created to seek out the opinions of others.

-Fooglmog
Guy with no clue.

Meh, not just to seek out opinions but also to defend our grabbing policies from what we view as unfair criticism...

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 18th 2010, 22:28:59

Originally posted by Fooglmog:

Okay, well if you're going to be a d*ck about this -- I'm going to assume that everyone else is right, because it seems unlikely that the whole server would be wrong, and you're not bothering to provide any information that's useful in establishing the contrary.

-Fooglmog
Guy with no clue.

Fine, have a look at the grabbing between Fist and Monsters.

And Spawn is correct, with two exceptions that I can think of off the top of my head, every clan we have grabbed has complained either to us or to someone else or had suicides.

And Ruth's point of view seems pretty boring to me. Fine, you don't like being grabbed... maybe they should set up a special all explore server for you to play on.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 18th 2010, 1:37:22

Originally posted by snawdog:

So...then, your 'double tap' should be excused..?(not policed)

Umm that was the last double tap by the member all set, so you tell me whether our "policing" worked.

Obviously it's impossible to get a 100% mistake free reset or to control your members 100%.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 18th 2010, 0:38:41

And one more post to clarify... obvious when I said "hit" I meant "grab"

Retals are not included ;)

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 18th 2010, 0:36:15

And I'm not saying that to attack PDM/you, just throwing it up to highlight that we do enforce the rule relatively well.

smikke

Member

EE Patron
243

Sep 18th 2010, 0:34:07

Originally posted by snawdog:

tl:read the rest

Well, your #'s of grabs per member are either wrong, or not policed very well.
I can say for certain that some mid sized clans have been tagged for more grabs then your policy allows.
Unless this is a new policy..(i mean NEW this set)

Curious to see examples?

I just ran through our news with PDM for the set, we have one double tap - the only violation of our 72h policy with you guys.

If that's "not policed very well," how would you describe your 5 RoRs (within 5 days) that weren't related to any policy disputes? (ie. the 48 vs 72 hour thing)