Dec 13th 2012, 12:07:41
1. laf
best overall (netting + warring)
2. sof
best warring, but we don't know how good they actually are per member because of their choice to fight MD and TIE "separately" instead of at once
3. MD
second best overall (netting + warring)
4. RIVAL
weak per member alliance but has a lot of members. fought stupid wars last set.
5. Evo
best per member netters, edging out LaF slightly
6. SOL
weird membership fluctuations, pretty weak netting effort last set
7. PDM
I'm assuming the low membership this set is a random fluctuation and they're actually the 45/50 member alliance they usually are to place them here. but weak member quality means they're below the Evo/SOL duo.
8. RD
can't net without landtrading or dropping members (adjusted for members dropped, including other clans' dropped members*, they would have been 4th in avg net last set), but is up here by virtue of having quite a few members with the neo merger and semi-decent member quality
9. TIE
good alliance on a per member basis, but needs more members
10. Omega + Monsters
... what can you really say about them? Good netters (better than RD), but very small. Monsters regressed from a temporary membership peak a few sets ago.
11. iMag
being killed by bigger alliances for two sets in a row = just what iMag deserves. actually, they probably deserve one more set of pointless dying.
12. LCN
seems to be a bit of an unfortunate decline in members for this otherwise good overall alliance. they'll bounce back, or so I hope.
13. Sanct
small alliance, good netters. also drop members and landtrade but would have beat RD in the "legit avg net" standings last set
14. DK
good effort
15. ICN
still around?
*even though there's a big difference usually between the "inactives" RD drops (who have spent the whole set helping out on kill runs / being internal landfarms) vs the inactives other clans drop
This guy is destroying the U.S. Dollars position as the preferred exchange for international trade. The Chinese Ruan is going to replace it soon, then the U.S. will not have control of the IMF